doodledup
@doodledup@lemmy.world
- Comment on Shopify CEO Tobi Lütke tells employees to prove AI can’t do the job before asking for resources. 1 day ago:
Na man. It’s being used extensively in many jobs. Software development especially. You’re misinformed or have a biased view on it based on your personal experience with it.
- Comment on Framework temporarily pausing some laptop sales in the US due to tariffs 1 day ago:
Not in Europe AFAIK.
- Comment on Shopify CEO Tobi Lütke tells employees to prove AI can’t do the job before asking for resources. 1 day ago:
Every CEO should do that. There’s so much bureaucracy and unnecessary bloat in companies that can be reduced if the leadership is a little more riguous. This is especially important in the current market.
- Comment on Shopify CEO Tobi Lütke tells employees to prove AI can’t do the job before asking for resources. 1 day ago:
Why?
- Comment on Most Americans think AI won’t improve their lives, survey says 1 day ago:
What makes you think that?
- Comment on Most Americans think AI won’t improve their lives, survey says 1 day ago:
If it reaches me, so be it. That’s life. Survival of the fittest. It’s my own responsibility to do the best in the environment I live in.
- Comment on Deletion of major news channel sparks fears Telegram has given in to Kremlin pressure. 1 day ago:
It’s obvious.
Telegram was banned in Russia for a short time and for some inexplicit reason unbanned. Russia has made no attempt since then to ban them. The founder of Durov explained that they managed to force Russia to unban them becauye they kept buyint changing IPv4 addresses to evade the ban. But everyone who knows the technology knows this is a stupid reason and completely unbelievable. IP addresses are very expensive and the connections in the app need to change to the new IP. At the rate that Russia and everyone else is able to block IPs (thousands per second) you simply cannot implement such a strategy. What Telegram is saying is dumb propaganda for the gullible.
Telegram insists on not having end-to-end encryption for default chats and group chats and profile and contact data. They use E2EE for Secret Chats but they use MTProto, which is a custom key exchange and encryption algorithm that is doing some fairly questionable stuff according to leading experts in the field. Telegram being insecure is no problem in itself. But they explicitly advertise it as being secure and private and mislead the users to believe no government can spy on them.
They are based in the UAE with their main office being empty and essentially only a mailbox. Nobody actually knows where they are.
Their servers (with unencrypted chat data) are hosted in questionable authoritarian countries all over the world. They do not have any servers in Europe or the US. This is a huge problem since nobody knows what server software they are running and your chats are not encrypted.
If you want to be sure that nobody gets and uses your data use an end-to-end encrypted messenger like Signal. If it’s end-to-end encrypted and open-source then no other questions need to be asked.
- Comment on Deletion of major news channel sparks fears Telegram has given in to Kremlin pressure. 1 day ago:
Telegram was subordinate to the Kremlin the whole time. You have to be stupid to not realize that.
- Comment on How to transfer a lot of data? 3 days ago:
That would take 22 hours under ideal conditions on a 1gbit connection. If you copy files and not block data it’ll probaboy take 24h or more. Not fun.
- Comment on Most Americans think AI won’t improve their lives, survey says 3 days ago:
People can have smartphones and tech the past didn’t have, but be increasingly worse off financially and unable to afford housing.
You really have no idea what life was like just two or three generations ago. At lesst you have toilet paper, water, can shower, and don’t need to starve to death when the pig in your backyard dies of some illness.
- Comment on Most Americans think AI won’t improve their lives, survey says 3 days ago:
We are ants in an anthill. Gears in a machine. Act like it. Stop thinking in classes “rich vs. poor”. When you become obsolete it’s nobody’s fault. This always comes from people who don’t understand how this world works.
Progress always comes, finds its way and you can never stop it. Like water in a river. Like entropy. Adapt early instead of desperately forcing against it.
- Comment on Most Americans think AI won’t improve their lives, survey says 3 days ago:
You’re using it wrong. My experience is different from yours. It produces transfer knowledge in the queries I ask it. Not even hundret Googl searches can replace transfer knowledge.
- Comment on Most Americans think AI won’t improve their lives, survey says 3 days ago:
Are you a poor kid or something? Like what kind of question even is this? Why does it even need to be personal at all? This thread is not about me…
And no. I’m not. I stand to inherit nothing. I’m still a student. I’m not wealthy or anything like that.
- Comment on Most Americans think AI won’t improve their lives, survey says 3 days ago:
That’s true. And that’s why so many people are frustrated. Because the majority is incredibly short-sighted unfortunately. Most people don’t even understand the basics of economics. If everyone was the ant in the anthill they’re supposed to be we would not have half as many conflics as we have.
- Comment on Most Americans think AI won’t improve their lives, survey says 3 days ago:
We don’t know it yet. I can’t see the future and you neither. But you cannot question the fact that AI has made a lot of things more efficient. And efficiency always brings progress in one way or the other.
- Comment on Most Americans think AI won’t improve their lives, survey says 3 days ago:
Your comment doesn’t exactly testify intelligence yourself.
You might want to elaborate on some arguments in more detail that actually relate to the comment you’re responding to.
- Comment on Most Americans think AI won’t improve their lives, survey says 3 days ago:
That’s the first interesting argument I’m reading here. Glad someone takes an honest stance in this discussion instead of just “rich vs poor”, “but people will lose jobs” and some random conspiracies in between.
To your comment: I agree with your sentiment that AI will make it challenging for new brains to evolve as solving difficult tasks is a problem we will encounter much less in the future. I actually never thought about it that way. I don’t have a solution for that. I think it will have two outcomes: humans will lose intelligence, or humans will develop different intelligence in a way that we don’t understand yet today.
And you are bringing up efficiency. Efficiency is just a buzzword that big companies are using to replace human labor. How much more efficient is a bank where you have 4 machine and one human teller? Or a fast food restaurant where the upfront employee just delivers the food to the counter and you can only place order with a computer.
I disagree with that. Efficiency is a universal term. And humanity has always striven to do things more efficient because it increased the likelihood of survival and quality of life in general. It’s a very natural thing and you cannot stop it. Much as you cannot stop entropy. Also, I think making things more efficient is good for society. Everything becomes easier, more available, and more fun. I can see a far future where humans no longer need to work and can do whatever they want with their day. Jobs will become hobbies and family and friends are what you care about most.
- Comment on Most Americans think AI won’t improve their lives, survey says 3 days ago:
Great for people getting fired or finding that now the jobs they used to have that were middle class are now lower class pay or obsolete. They will be so delighted at the progress despite their salaries and employment benefits and opportunities falling.
This shouldn’t come as a surprise. Everyone who’s suprised by that is either not educated how economy works or how societal progress works. There are always winners and losers but society makes net-positive progress as a whole.
I have no empathy for people losing their jobs. Even if I lose my job, I accept it. It’s just life. Humanity is a really big machine of many gears. Some gears replace others to make the machine run more efficient.
And it’s so nice that AI is most concentrated in the hands of billionaires who are oh so generous with improving living standards of the commoners. Wonderful.
This is just a sad excuse I’m hearing all the time. The moment society gets intense and chang is about to happen, a purpetrator needs to be found. But most people don’t realize that the people at the top change all the time when the economy changes. They die aswell. It’s a dynamic system. And there is no one purpetrator in a dynamic system. The only purpetrator is progress. And progress is like entropy. It always find its way and you cannot stop it. Those who attempt to stop it instead of adapting to it will be crushed.
- Comment on Most Americans think AI won’t improve their lives, survey says 3 days ago:
I trust you’ve volunteered for it to replace you then. It being so beneficial to society, and all.
Yes. If I get replaced by something more efficient I accept that. I am no longer worth the position of my job. I will look for something else and try to find ways to apply some of my skillsets in other ways. I may do some further training and education, or just accept a lower paying job if that’s not possible.
And then those people no longer working… do what, exactly? Fewer well-paying jobs, same number of people, increasing costs. Math not working out here.
Can you elaborate? I don’t quiet understand what you mean by that. The people who no longer work need to find something else. There will remain only a fraction that can never find another job again. And that fraction is offset by the increased productivity of society.
Oh, it has value. Just not for society (it could that’s the sad part). For very specific people though, yeah, value. Just got to step on all the little people along the way, like we’ve always done, eh?
Can you specify “specific”? What little people? If you use very vague terminology like that you should back it up with some arguments. I personally see no reason why AI would disadvantage working people any more than the sewing machine did back in the day.
I have a feeling you’re not actually thinking this through, or at least doing it on a very emotional level. This will not help you adapt to the changing world. The very opposite actually.
- Comment on Most Americans think AI won’t improve their lives, survey says 4 days ago:
This is collateral damage of societal progress. This is a phenomenon as old as humanity. You can’t fight it. And it has brought us to where we are now. From cavemen to space explorers.
- Comment on Most Americans think AI won’t improve their lives, survey says 4 days ago:
AI is changing the landscape of our society. It’s only “destroying” society if that’s your definition of change.
But fact is, AI makes every aspect where it’s being used a lot more productive and easier. And that has to be a good thing in the long run. It always has.
Instead of holding against progress (which is impossible to do for long) you should embrace it and go from there.
- Comment on Most Americans think AI won’t improve their lives, survey says 4 days ago:
You’re using it wrong then. These tools are so incredibly useful in software development and scientific work. Chatgpt has saved me countless hours. I’m using it every day. And every colleague I talk to agrees 100%.
- Comment on Europe proposes backdoors in encrypted platforms under new security strategy 4 days ago:
But it’s not going to happen. It’s so unbelievably stupid and impossible to implement.
- Comment on Most Americans think AI won’t improve their lives, survey says 4 days ago:
Replacing people is a good thing. It means less people do more work. It means progress. It means products and services will get cheaper and more available.
- Comment on Most Americans think AI won’t improve their lives, survey says 4 days ago:
Life isn’t always Occam’s Razor.
- Comment on Most Americans think AI won’t improve their lives, survey says 4 days ago:
Everyone gains from progress. We’ve had the same discussion over and over again. When the first sewing machines came along, when the steam engine was invented, when the internet became a thing. Some people will lose their job every time progress is made. But being against progress for that reason is just stupid.
- Comment on Microsoft employee disrupts 50th anniversary and calls AI boss ‘war profiteer’ 4 days ago:
I’m very confused. Can somebody explain how any of that makes any sense?
- Comment on Raspi manufacturer discloses sales figures and costs 4 days ago:
It is the norm for almost every company.
- Comment on Massive Expansion Of Italy’s Piracy Shield Underway Despite Growing Criticism Of Its Flaws 4 days ago:
Something has to be done but this is not the solution. I can see so many ways how this will be exploited to get legitimate sites blocked. They will rollback this legislation in notime.
- Comment on Europe proposes backdoors in encrypted platforms under new security strategy 5 days ago:
They keep trying. It’s not going to happen. Relax.