I don’t care what he says, I will never buy a game with Denuvo.
Denuvo respond to their rep for tanking games - "I'm a gamer myself, and therefore I know what I'm talking about"
Submitted 4 weeks ago by moe90@feddit.nl to technology@lemmy.world
Comments
cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 4 weeks ago
DragonOracleIX@lemmy.ml 4 weeks ago
Same for me. Denvo killed me enjoyment of monster hunter world. Locked me out of the game when I tried playing it after a long break from the game. Being told I have to wait 24 hours before attempting to play a game I paid for was a quick way to get me to not want to buy any denuvo game.
KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 4 weeks ago
It’s really a shame, because I was super excited for MH:Wilds, but the confirmation that it will include Denuvo killed my enthusiasm completely.
FangedWyvern42@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
That is ridiculous. I love Monster Hunter, but if that happened to me I would instantly refund the game.
Goun@lemmy.ml 4 weeks ago
That’s ridiculous, I really hope developers avoid it as the plague more and more.
NRay7882@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
If it were just bad PR, publishers wouldn’t be removing it from their games left and right. It’s a flawed security system.
Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 4 weeks ago
That’s easy, I never buy games at launch!
sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 4 weeks ago
Goun@lemmy.ml 4 weeks ago
God, hard to read more than half of it, this guy’s a total idiot. He really thinks he sells a solution, fucking wake up off that dream. It was nice, you enjoyed it, now wake up, go do something else, or just take the money and retire, idk, idc.
Fuck DRM, what a shitty way of screwing up content.
AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 4 weeks ago
What makes you think he’s an idiot as opposed to lying through his teeth?
- ‘It’s difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on not understanding it’
rikudou@lemmings.world 4 weeks ago
RPS: The study you mention showed that having Denuvo software improves revenues at launch, but also showed that a certain point after release - I think it was around three months - it evens out. Do you think publishers should have a policy of eventually removing Denuvo and making that clear to players in their marketing?
Andreas Ullmann: That’s the only point of the study where I’m not totally agreeing.
Well, who would have thunk!
JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 3 weeks ago
Personally, I’m okay with Denuvo and other similar DRM when it’s used for the intended purpose - to prevent launch day hype piracy. The first few weeks/months are crucial for sales, and I can understand why developers do it.
But after that, especially after the game is cracked, remove the fucking DRM as it’s now useless and only makes the experience of legitimate customers worse.
OneOrTheOtherDontAskMe@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Only Denuvo has reported that it’s better for sales, the rest of us don’t have data on that and I’m not trusting the wolf with Hen House design
JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 3 weeks ago
Denuvo is an interesting one, as it’s both very hated, but also rather effective - in the last four years, only around 25 Denuvo games out of a hundred have been cracked. So with that, pirates can’t even rely on waiting as something you want to play might get cracked next week, or it might take years or simply never get cracked - poor Tourist Bus Simulator, nobody loves you.
So it turns in to a fairly simple math problem, though one with both variables being unknown (to me at least) - how many people who would buy the game don’t because it has Denuvo, vs how many people that would pirate the game buy it instead when they can’t.
vzq@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
The only positive thing is that they are SUCH GREEDY FUCKS that companies often patch out the protection after release to stop paying them.
Vilian@lemmy.ca 3 weeks ago
When enshitification hurta otiself in confusion lol, but I think it’s a good thing, people who don’t care buy the game at launch, and people that care buy the game 3 months later with better performance
ihatetheworld@lemmy.ml 4 weeks ago
Denuvo profits off game developers fears of their game not being well received by gamers for reasons such as performance issues, bugs, or at its foundation is just a mediocre game.
I like to believe that the narrative that piracy hurt sales is only true for medicore/bad games because the average pirate is broke and they are not going to buy your game just because of denuvo and those who can afford to buy will choose not to after getting to try it.
On the other hand good games will always be commerical successful with or without denuvo.
Sabata11792@ani.social 3 weeks ago
Is this a business entity wearing the skin of a human, or a clown wearing the skin of a business?
dustyData@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Surely the former because at least clowns try to be funny and entertaining.
Kolanaki@yiffit.net 4 weeks ago
As a gamer, I know that gamers don’t actually know a fucking thing.
archonet@lemy.lol 3 weeks ago
Because as we all know, being a gamer means you also can’t be a fucking moron.
… Wait.
echodot@feddit.uk 3 weeks ago
I bet he plays like it’s Call Of Duty in multiplayer games which require team cooperation.
AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 3 weeks ago
Arrogant cunt. Fuck you and your shitty “product”.
DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
Just stoooooop FUCKING T A L K I N G
weew@lemmy.ca 3 weeks ago
Hello, fellow kids
SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 3 weeks ago
What a fuckin’ crock.
liquidparasyte@pawb.social 3 weeks ago
Unlikeable asshole entity tries even harder to get people to like them. Results are mixed
rikudou@lemmings.world 4 weeks ago
Going by that logic, there’s simply no way that Denuvo does not hinder performance.
rdri@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
That’s also a lie. There is no way it would be impossible to remove the protection code (or parts of it) or make it not execute. That alone makes him a clown.
CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Not to mention that some of the cracks are incredibly lightweight in the first place so even disabling a small amount of their code would improve things. Removing the encryption mechanisms alone works wonders.
Hazzard@lemm.ee 3 weeks ago
Sounds like a CEO who doesn’t have a damn clue how code works. His description sounds like he thinks every line of code takes the same amount of time to execute, as if
x = 1;
takes as long as encryption/decryption.“Adding” code to bypass your encryption is obviously going to make things run way faster.