A 20 year deal, with no power produced until 2028?
Either MS really do know something we don’t, or this bubble has grained a layer of strontium.
Three Mile Island nuclear plant set for restart on Microsoft AI power deal
Submitted 1 month ago by negativenull@lemmy.world to technology@lemmy.world
Comments
hellothere@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
It’s the second one. They are all in on this AI bullshit because they’ve got nothing else. There are no other exponential growth markets left. Capitalism has gotten so autocanibalistic that simply being a global monopoly in multiple different fields isn’t good enough. For investors it’s not about how big your company is, how reliable your yearly returns are, how stable your customer base; the only thing that matters is how fast your business is growing. But small businesses have no space to grow because of the monopolies filling every available space, and the monopolies are already monopolies. There are no worlds left to conquer. They’ve already turned every single piece of our digital lives into a subscription, blockchain was a total bust, the metaverse was a demented fever dream, VR turned out to be a niche toy at best; unless someone comes up with some brand new thing that no one has ever heard of before, AI is the last big boondoggle they have left to hit the public with.
XeroxCool@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I don’t buy that this is the last market. The current major one, yes, but calling it the last one is, not to be rude, short-sighted and unimaginative. AI/LLMs/advance algorithms will continue and some advanced technology will be built off of those. We didn’t stop with plain electricity, we didn’t stop with physical memory, we didn’t stop with plain programs, so why would we stop now?
There are plenty of markets outside this one niche of “tech”. And I get it, I’m the outsider in the fediverse as I don’t work in IT, don’t code, and don’t even use Linux.
I work in American rail transportation (a notably hot topic here!) and it’s incredibly outdated. Freight has such unimaginable interchangeability of individual cars between trains (consists) and rail lines that any kind of change has to overcome massive, disconnected lethargy of multiple groups. Aside from the shear volume of cars, it has to pass through multiple parties to operate on “interchange”: all involved railroads, the car owners, the car leasees, sometimes the good owner, and the locomotive owner (not always the rail owner). Freight cars have no mandatory/universal electronics on board. Brakes are applied via manual air pressure logic from a single signal hose and can take several minutes to reach the end of the train. Certainly, wireless electronic communication would improve this but imagine trying to pair 250 cars to the locomotive. We can say just add a plug like a truck trailer plug, but changing a 100 year old hookup procedure is a task, so say the least. Improvement is coming, but adoption must be rolled out and it must be free of tamper risk. There’s also essentially no tracking on rail cars. Services offered are atrocious. For maintenance, the latest thing is massive photobooths capturing every single car passing through. They’re pretty effective. And, despite all this sounding ancient, hostile takeovers, planted execs, pleasing shareholders, and running logistics into the ground for a short profit return to shares is just as present.
Side note: the only “unit trains” around, the only ones that stay as one single consist and don’t exchange between locomotives or rail lines, are coal trains. And they’re on their way out.
Passenger trains leave much to be desired and while there’s plenty of tech left to import from other continents, there’s not much incentive. The USA is huge and the populations centers are far apart. We like to look at Germany, the UK, France, and the like as examples but their physical size is comparable to the US regions already served by transit. The US population is much more coastal than Europe (Atlantic, pacific, golf of Mexico, great lakes) and, on many topics really, Americans tend to forget about eastern Europe. That’s our Midwest/rust belt/flyover states.
Road vehicles are ever-Improving but all I see here on lemmy is treating the privacy element as a crisis. I agree, and I can see why it’s important, but the physical advances are blatantly ignored. Hybrid and bev have large hurdles ahead of them to continue mass adoption. Aerodynamics and other rolling resistance elements are always improved. Who knows what the next paradigm shift in cars will be.
Similar things apply to planes.
Building infrastructure is always advancing. Better insulation, faster construction techniques, stronger materials, longer spans, less foundation intrusion, and greater durability.
And yes, we can talk about the continuous enshittification of all these industries, but, just like tech, that’s enshittification of the final product, not of the actual tech behind it. The tech has always been improving.
Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 1 month ago
100%, all of this.
conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
It doesn’t really matter whether it’s LLMs. There are limits to the value of creating an increasing amount of new hardware to do any particular math, but once you have the hardware it’s pretty easy to find applications for the electricity to pay for itself.
There are countless spaces that will benefit from as much math as we can give them for a long time.
zbyte64@awful.systems 1 month ago
That’s what happened for Personal Computers because most people could own one. Microsoft is trying to relive their PC highlights by going all in on nuclear powered mainframes.
0x0@programming.dev 1 month ago
So long as it’s not Microsoft managing the plant nor are they using any MS product to do so…
negativenull@lemmy.world 1 month ago
It’s an experiment to see how OpenAI can control a nuclear power plant! Imagine the efficiency!
Addv4@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Truly erasing the carbon footprint for hundreds of miles around!
MintyFresh@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I mean what could possibly go wrong?
0x0@programming.dev 1 month ago
Not this particular one. The only mention of IpenAI is
Altman has backed and is the chairman of nuclear power startup Oklo (OKLO.N), which went public through a blank-check merger in May, while TerraPower - a startup Gates co-founded - broke ground on a nuclear facility in June.
jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
If you knew how much of the critical infrastructure in the US is held together by Windows Server and duct tape, you would be very concerned.
0x0@programming.dev 1 month ago
Not my problem, really… but Windows Serve is quite the upgrade… don’t you mean XP?
pdxfed@lemmy.world 1 month ago
“sorry boss, just saw ‘restart’ and updated the code…that’s not going to cause any reactor problems will it?”
harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
This sounds like the opening animatic for a new Fallout game.
echodot@feddit.uk 1 month ago
I assume actual nuclear engineers will be the ones operating the power plant.
zbyte64@awful.systems 1 month ago
I wonder what vault numbers they would get. Or would they just be two letters like NT or XP
iopq@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Vault number 98, 2k, 2003, 7, 8, 10, 11
harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
Vista
Telorand@reddthat.com 1 month ago
There is something wrong with your tech if you need your own nuclear plant to run it.
I mean, it’s better than coal, but still.
echodot@feddit.uk 1 month ago
I’m all right with it really because it doesn’t really matter. Nuking material isn’t really dangerous at least in any sensible context and it doesn’t really put out a lot of carbon so if Microsoft want to restart nuclear power station then I don’t really have any objection.
As to whether they need to be doing this is another question, but the fact that they’re doing it at all doesn’t really bother me.
There’s always the outside possibility that they decide that the nuclear power station isn’t enough and end up building a Dyson Sphere or something.
iopq@lemmy.world 1 month ago
It puts out literally zero carbon. Once you build a nuclear plant it’s 100% green after the construction
Telorand@reddthat.com 1 month ago
I think it’s the responsible thing to do, sure, but I feel like there’s a problem of scalability with LLMs. That was more of my point.
BombOmOm@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Glad to see more carbon-free power on-lining!
MyOpinion@lemm.ee 1 month ago
Why in the world would you want to revive a clearly dangerous design of a plant.
shalafi@lemmy.world 1 month ago
A poof of radioactive steam let loose. That’s it, the whole incident. People freaked out on March 28, 1979.
In totally unrelated news, The China Syndrome, about a reactor meltdown, came out March 16, 1979.
suburban_hillbilly@lemmy.ml 1 month ago
Not only did you not read the article, but you apparently don’t know that much about TMI either. There are multiple reactors at TMI, the one that had the accident is not the one they’re restarting.
The one they’re restarting shut down a few years ago, along with several other nuclear plants, due to being too expensive to compete on cost with all the cheap gas post fracking boom.
Yes, for reasons passing understanding the state and federal government allowed existing, functional nuclear plants to close in favor of natural gas plants.
MyOpinion@lemm.ee 1 month ago
I saw that it was a different reactor, but is the design that much different from the one they had the problem with?
Snowpix@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
TMI operated safely and without incident for 40 years after the accident. An accident that killed nobody and amounted to little more than a poof of steam.
Soup@lemmy.cafe 1 month ago
Given how faulty and untrustworthy AI is it only makes sense to give it the keys to nuclear power plants.
Fucking geniuses.
superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
The plant is being started back up to meet new power demands from AI, AI won’t be controlling the plants.
zbyte64@awful.systems 1 month ago
Yeah, but think of the marketing and the cost savings from firing nuclear scientists. Can’t wait for 3 mill island to get the enshittificatiom treatment
TCB13@lemmy.world 1 month ago
So… now nuclear is considered “green power”. Okay boomers.
JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 month ago
Nuclear is definitely more green than fossil fuels.
OmanMkII@aussie.zone 1 month ago
Even with the radioactive waste material, in 20 years that will just be more fuel for fission reactors. Even taking into account the deaths from atomic bombs, the death rate from nuclear materials is a factor of a few hundred lower than coal power.
TCB13@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I agree with that, 100% but for the majority of the world how green it is usually depends on how far-left you are.
lemba@discuss.tchncs.de 1 month ago
Nuclear Power is NOT green energy! Anyone who believes that bullshit is brainwashed…
tourist@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I’m not scared of nuclear power
but hearing it in the same sentence as ‘Microsoft AI’ sent a shiver down my spine
passivelnk@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Like in Westworld, the Hoover Dam was allocated to power the AI. This is very dystopian on one level but on another level, the notion that so muchreal engineering is being used to feed a computer that generates incorrect bullshit is kinda comical.
isaaclw@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Well, if cars dont cause climate change, AI will.