Every time I get an email about

Comments

• molten@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Hey, at least they’re transparent.

  source

  • pivot_root@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    You’re right, that’s unrealistic.

    If those stall dividers were fully opaque with a one-way mirror acting as the wall, that would be more like it.

    source
• db2@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Actual nightmare material.

  source

  • NightAuthor@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I’m pretty sure this has that fancy transitioning glass, when you lock the door it goes opaque.

    source

    • turbowafflz@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Hmm, what happens if there’s a power outage? Or is dark the default state and it needs power to be clear?

      source

      • -> View More Comments
    • jaybone@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      That’s what they want you to believe.

      source
  • red_rising@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    One persons nightmare is another persons fetish.

    source
  • johannesvanderwhales@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    This might be a prison.

    source
• Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Just like those “we value your privacy” cookie banners that don’t give you the option to reject all. If they truly valued my privacy, they would give me that option instead of having me toggle off 500000 “partners” one by one in the hopes I accidentally skip one. Bastards.

  source

  • spongebue@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Or just… Not have 500000 partners in the first place

    source

    • unconsciousvoidling@sh.itjust.works ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Bunch of sluts

      source
  • brbposting@sh.itjust.works ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I like the one that takes 30 seconds to deny all but accepts all instantly.

    Most transparent dark pattern

    source

    • ulterno@lemmy.kde.social ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      I just decide that any site doing that doesn’t really have anything meaningful to provide and has mostly copy-pasted content from actual resource-providing websites, with added SEO.
      So I just close the site most of the time.

      So far it has paid off. I tend to find more sites that give information that was actually written by someone knowledgable about the field.
      Thinking I should start making my own list, considering search engines are probably never going to make those easier to find.

      source
  • blackn1ght@feddit.uk ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Those aren’t compliant. The reject all needs to be as prominent as the accept all option without any additional clicks. So many sites get it wrong it’s insane!

    source

    • Amir@lemmy.ml ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      So many sites get it wrong

      If they get away with it, they very much got it right

      source
• HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Don’t forget the cameras

  source

  • eager_eagle@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    but it’s for your own safety

    source

    • jaybone@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Need ta check ya ayzzhole

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• wesker@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  But they’ll see me shirtless.

  source

  • thefartographer@lemm.ee ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    And how much poop I get on my hands with my clumsy wipe

    source

    • Omgarm@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      If you sit the proper way around you can’t see other people anyway, so just pretend you’re alone.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • JigglypuffSeenFromAbove@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Now there’s at least three of us: you, me and George Costanza.

    source
• RobotZap10000@feddit.nl ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  We value your privacy, we share your data with all of our 762 partners!

  source

  • HereIAm@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    It is honestly disgusting when they list the number of parties, especially when you see 100+ vendors on the “Legitimate purpose” toggle. Fuck off you have a legitimate purpose to my browsing.

    source
• jonasw@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  “We value our customers privacy”

  “Privacy is our top priority”

  source

  • Hellstormy@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    “We and our 895 partners value your privacy very much”

    source
  • the_third@feddit.de ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    “We value our customers privacy”

    I mean, I can imagine that. I’m sure they know the exact market value of every behavioral data point they can extract from me.

    source
  • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    • where is doesn’t stand in the way of profit

    source
• J3K@kbin.social ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  “We value our customers' privacy - it's our main revenue stream!”

  source
• JackFrostNCola@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Why is there no paper or bidets…

  source

  • velvetThunder@lemmy.zip ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Enshitification, literally

    source
  • lugal@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Asking the real questions…

    source
• Ironfacebuster@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  “it’s called being transparent. Oh no, not for us”

  source
• altima_neo@lemmy.zip ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Lately, all Ive been getting are changes involving arbitration. Shit, I even got one from a fucking grocery store app.

  source

  • brbposting@sh.itjust.works ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    How it’s not illegal to bypass the friggin justice system…

    source
• onion@feddit.de ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  www.privacyguides.org

  source
• HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I know this bathroom, they have the stalls, you sit down and your head peeks over the top of the walls. I guess they expected everyone to be very short? I’m not even six foot so I don’t know. I think of it as the social shitter.

  source

  • WashedOver@lemmy.ca ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    There’s public washrooms like this in a mall in Seattle, or at least there was a few years back. Half height stalls. When one is sitting the walls only come up to your elbows. One of the most bizarre setups for a public bathroom I’ve seen in my travels.

    source

    • brbposting@sh.itjust.works ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Poor Shaq if he ever has to use those

      source
• lastrogue@lemm.ee ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Pray we do not update it again.

  source
• Mio@feddit.nu ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Are they required by law or something to send those out? It is almost like needing to reconfirm your cookie in the webbrowser

  source
• synapse1278@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Transparency is key

  source
• asteriskeverything@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I tend to always read these, both when I sign up and when there are changes. Idk if I ever felt that it changed significantly at all from what I expected originally. They are “updated” annually and when a new law passes so usually it is no change or something about the new law. Basically usually if you consented to the original privacy policy, updates are unlikely to have anything surprising and new to change your mind. I guess unless it went from none to some/a lot of shared data!

  source

  • brbposting@sh.itjust.works ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I respect when they summarize their changes at the top / in the update email

    source
• Sam_Bass@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Ive gotten 4 notifications from sammy sung advising me they have updated their TOS. never used to get those

  source