Where’s a Johnny cab when you need it
Or a Delamain.
Comment on Men Harassed A Woman In A Driverless Waymo, Trapping Her In Traffic
TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 1 month ago
I can see criminals easily exploiting this default behavior to stop the car and steal from those inside.
Where’s a Johnny cab when you need it, it knows how to deal with criminals.
brucethemoose@lemmy.world 1 month ago
sundray@lemmus.org 1 month ago
allidoislietomyself@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Only if you upgrade to the Excelsior package
intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 month ago
My car isn’t driverless, but I as the driver have less control than ever before.
It’s an EV, and it will not shift to drive or reverse if the charging cable is attached.
Great for preventing me from destroying a charger. Terrible for getting away from someone trying to mug me.
Far too much of the safety features these days assume an environment in which all harm is accidental. This comes at the cost of safety in environments where someone is trying to harm another person.
Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 month ago
You don’t complain about having to open your door or start the engine when escaping a threat.
Having to unplug a cable during a very specific, imagined threat seems like a niche problem.
jaemo@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Additionally: if you’re at a gas station filling an ICE vehicle and you get mugged, and you panic and peel out, there’s gas going everywhere, plenty of potential ignition sources etc.
The argument “I have more control and agency therefore I am quantifiably safer” can fuck alllllll the way off. Safety regulations are written in blood.
Anyolduser@lemmynsfw.com 1 month ago
The difference being that not being able to start the motor with the door open is only a problem if the driver was being attacked in a parking lot.
It’s not too big of a leap to imagine a world where a person could immobilize a car at a red light with the plug cut off from a public charger. Wall up to a stopped car, open the hatch (maybe it needs a pry bar) and put the dummy plug in. Now the car is immobilized. Smash the driver side window and they’re in business.
Sure, there are some safeguards that can be added like requiring a current to immobilize the vehicle, but it’s far from the simplest or safest answer. Car manufacturers need to stop putting in hard limits and just use alarms instead. I bought a new Subaru that has collision detection standard. The hedge next to my driveway was overgrown, but I drove right through it. The car sounded an alarm and flashed a bunch of lights, but it didn’t engage the brakes, I was able to blast through an obstacle that I knew was minor even though the car thought it was a threat. If a manufacturer feels compelled to add a safety system, it’s possible to do so without taking control away from the driver.
nef@slrpnk.net 1 month ago
It’s not too big of a leap
I think it is. I’d like to see at least one documented case of this happening before people start demanding that cars be able to move while plugged in. Plus, in the very scenario you describe, the car would still be able to move, no? Attaching a charger does nothing unless you’re changing to parked at every red light.
The only time you’d need to drive away while charging is if the attacker walks up while you’re sitting in your parked car, or kindly decides to let you get in before doing anything.
I can’t find a single instance of someone being unable to escape because of their charger, so maybe let’s worry about it if it ever becomes a problem.
Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 month ago
It’s not too big of a leap to imagine a world where a person could immobilize a car at a red light with the plug cut off from a public charger. Wall up to a stopped car, open the hatch (maybe it needs a pry bar) and put the dummy plug in.
Sounds like a lot of hassle. If they want to immoblise a self driving car they just stand in front of it.
Why carry a plug cut off from a public charger when you can just stab the tyres?
Use the pry bar to smash the window and open the door. Not open the charging port.
AA5B@lemmy.world 1 month ago
How would they open the charge port door? I can still imagine it because I have a good imagination but it’s just not going to happen.
Is someone really going to go through the trouble of carrying a cut off cable and a piece of electronics to open the charge port, and have time to walk up to the car click to open, wait for the door to open and insert the cable? There are faster and easier ways to immobilize a car, why would anyone make it so complicated?
And that assumes that safety feature is still engaged when you’re already driving
AA5B@lemmy.world 1 month ago
This is the seatbelt argument all over again. The safety features protect people in the majority of scenarios. While there may be scenarios where it does more harm than good, they are rare. You’re much safer with the safety feature.
jacksilver@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I don’t think there is a car where the seat belt is tied to anything besides a little notification beep. Seems like a different situation if the “safety” feature dictates how the car is used.
AA5B@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Seatbelts are legally mandated. When that was going through, some people argued against that requirement on the grounds that there edge cases where it dies more harm than good.
Just like the case here, those edge cases are vanishingly rare.
Note: my car won’t move without a seatbelt, but it’s an EV so furthers the argument that EVs are taking control from the driver.
spyd3r@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Pretty simple problem to solve, get a conceal carry permit.
CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
When the solution is “Vigilantism” you know the situation is fucked.
spyd3r@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
No, its self defense.
CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
In civilized countries “self defense” means you might have to punch someone. “You should have an easy way to kill someone on you at all times, and keep it hidden so they don’t know” is not self defense, but clear signs of a dystopia.
capital@lemmy.world 1 month ago
That was in response to being robbed.
I think the phrase you’re looking for is “defending yourself”.
CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
I don’t live in a 3rd world country, so I guess I just don’t understand the concept of needing to arm myself before leaving my house because I’m likely to need a deadly weapon while I go about my business.
CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 5 weeks ago
interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 1 month ago
Oops now everyone got guns and you get killed by some random. I’m sure judge dredd will save you. Try being more violent, violence solves all problem. It’s self defense that mean it’s right. Always remember, dead bodies tell no tales. Aim for the center of mass and always empty the mag to make sure there is only your side of the story left.
intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 month ago
Actually increasing the level of possible violence (and also the uncertainty of violent outcomes) does lead to a reduction in aggression. You have to be willing to think it through though.
interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 1 month ago
“What if he has a gun”
Thieves in your area are now packing, enjoy the upgrade on unpredictable violence
Try faster violence escalation next for extra spicy neighborhoods
vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Guns are for pussies carry a Dane axe like a respectable person.
I dont know if this is even a joke on my part.
ben_dover@lemmy.ml 1 month ago
ah, the American solution
mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 month ago
in a country that has more firearms than people, certainly adding MORE firearms will resolve these issues!
TheKMAP@lemmynsfw.com 1 month ago
I prefer to reduce demand, instead. Everyday people who feel happy and safe don’t feel the need to be violent.
intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 month ago
This is true of everyday people. But a small percentage of people are psychopaths, who are perfectly happy to be violent whenever they can get away with it.
A seriously deprived scenario will make others violent, but there is always a subset that is violent even in comfortable situations.
todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 1 month ago
Would you rather be reading a story about how this woman was arrested for murder? Just because these men were being pigs doesn’t mean you get to kill them…
intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 month ago
Well not if you aren’t armed. If you are armed, you do get to kill people.
An armed society is a polite society.
LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
Polite society my ass. I’ve owned guns for over 15 years and never has a gun de-escalated a situation. People who carry in public are way more likely to kill someone and to get themselves killed. Guns cause aggressiveness far more often.
The woman was never in danger, if she pulled a gun, her, the harrassers, and all other bystanders would have been in danger.
pooperNickel@lemm.ee 1 month ago
What a disgusting falsehood
immutable@lemm.ee 1 month ago
I suppose you might get to kill people but that doesn’t mean that the law is going to be ok with that. Proportionality of force is a thing. Stand your ground states are doing their best to change that, but that’s a very mixed bag.
If you shoot and kill someone for blocking your waymo and being a creep, in most places you are going to have to convince a district attorney and a jury that you were justified in ending their life. Even if you do that and escape criminal liability, you’ll then have to convince more people not to hold you liable in civil court.
Sounds pretty cool to go “I got a shooty bang bang so if I feel threatened in any way I can come out blasting.” It is true in the moment, but if you place any value on your future liberty, money, and time you might want to consider the ramifications of killing another human being.
Finally, even if society decides you shouldn’t face any criminal or civil penalty for killing someone, you will have to face yourself. Sitting behind a keyboard it sounds badass to shoot someone that’s pissing you off. In the moment you will probably feel justified. Many a young man sent to war or employed as a police officer didn’t think that taking a life would change them, only to find the reality of taking a life is not what the action movies promised. Self doubt, self loathing, ptsd, depression, these are all common reactions to reckoning with the fact that you are the cause of another persons death.
It is hard to feel like a righteous badass as you watch a grieving widow mourn someone that may have even done something stupid or wrong, knowing that their child has no father now and their wife no partner. Are these people jerks and creeps, sure, is the punishment for being a jerk or creep death, rarely. It is a heavy burden to carry to end another.
dubious@lemmy.world 1 month ago
lemmy is full of sissy pacifists but i upvoted you.
GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
I once had someone get in my face and say, “Are you man enough to fight me?” I responded with “I’m man enough to find non-violent solutions to my problems.” Why should someone be proud of the problem-resolution method of choice for 3-year-olds?
dubious@lemmy.world 1 month ago
there aren’t always non-violent solutions. i accept that reality. it’s nothing to be proud of, but i would be ashamed if i couldn’t deal with that truth.
intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 month ago
Violence is for situations when one’s choice of other resolution methods is gone. Such situations do exist.
pooperNickel@lemm.ee 1 month ago
And this is why we have a term called “toxic masculinity”.
PolydoreSmith@lemmy.world 1 month ago
How many people have you shot?
III@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Did the lady have 5 kids to feed?
Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 month ago
She did have 3 boobs.
chemicalprophet@lemm.ee 1 month ago
Everyone is a criminal
grandkaiser@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Thank God for cars. Imagine riding public transport and getting felt up/robbed/harassed. Glad we can all agree on this Lemmy 👍
Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
In public the group of people watching and in close proximity prevents a lot of crime. Criminals feel shame too and at the very least want to prolong their ability to continue to make money how they do.
A single person in a car is vulnerable simply because they are alone. They think the car protects them but its trivial to smash a window and pull someone out.
roguetrick@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I doubt choosing to stick up a vehicle covered in cameras with someone who likely isn’t even carrying cash is anyone’s idea of a good payoff.
Wildly_Utilize@infosec.pub 1 month ago
idk i think plenty of people carry expensive stuff on them
what a thief could actually get for them is another matter but clearly that doesnt stop them from trying
LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
The doors aren’t going to open from the outside, and authorities would be alerted immediately. Breaking the glass on a car window or holding people up at gun point… Yeah. Easier in the parking lot of any gas station, grocery store, neighborhood, Walmart, Mall, Jewelry store, movie theater. Wherever really. The people can get out of the car in an emergency just like any other car. Running someone down with a car is not the answer to many situations.
Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Affluent people taking a driverless car from the shopping district would absolutely be targets.
Put yourself in a drug addicts shoes, or just a thief’s shoes. How would you make this work?
It doesnt take much creativity, and the people who would do this type of thing are not known to be short on creativity.
AA5B@lemmy.world 1 month ago
This is where you carry a window spike and smash and grab. Why make it so much more complicated?