Gravitational force is never truly zero. If it has mass, it is pulling at you, though it may be so close to zero that you donât realize it.
Theyâre also exerting a minute amount of electrostatic attraction or repulsion.
Submitted â¨â¨8⊠â¨months⊠ago⊠by â¨Jilanico@lemmy.world⊠to â¨showerthoughts@lemmy.worldâŠ
Gravitational force is never truly zero. If it has mass, it is pulling at you, though it may be so close to zero that you donât realize it.
Theyâre also exerting a minute amount of electrostatic attraction or repulsion.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coulomb's_law
Amazing. Thanks for sharing!
Technically correct, but the gravity from stars is dwarfed by the gravity from yo momma.
Actually tru for every value of yo mama, from s to xxxxxxxxxl
While thatâs technically true, itâs good to note that this doesnât excuse astrology, which is based on the false fact that the gravity of celestial bodies influences our decisions in everyday life. The gravity of you Karen influences my âdaily lifeâ more than these celestial bodies and especially your belief in astrology. đ
Agreed đ¤
So, horoscopes are true? /s
While you are affected by gravity, itâd have less of an effect than other things.
For instance we can scientifically show your birth date does influence your personality, as long as you donât live on the equator.
The further North/South you go, the more pronounced the effect becomes.
That is to say that from large samplings, you can see that extroverted traits are more common with babies born in Spring (in the Northern hemisphere), while introversion is more associated with being born in autumn.
That ofc doesnât mean that a person who was born in November will automatically be less extroverted than one born in March, but if you pick two random people from those groups, itâs X% more likely that it is so.
Astrology is complete fucking bullshit though.
Astrology is complete fucking bullshit though.
I know. Thatâs why I added the â/sâ tag.
Wait, I thought gravity is not a âforceâ but the curvature of spacetime, so at some point the curvature gotta end or be disturbed by some other source nearby, right? A star so far away is not exerting any âforceâ on me as I already have two massive objects Earth and Sun twisting the spacetime around me so much. I could however be getting some gravitational waves from that star but not sure how strong theyâd be or if they reach me at all (again given Sun and Earth).
(NOTE: Iâm an engineer not a physicist so my understanding could all be wrong)
You're partially right. Gavity has infinite range, so a distant star does exert some force on you. And that force is present regardless of other gravitational fields like the Earth or Sun. However it's many orders of magnitude weaker than the force from the Earth and Sun so it's pretty much irrelevant.
Eh. Itâs not really a definite distinction. Even in GR you formulate effective potentials and the gradient on those potentials are still called forces. Then, what is a force on microscopic scale? It is the exchange of force mediators, like photons. If gravitons exists, then there is even a similar framework for defining a force on a microscopic level for electromagnetism as well as gravity. Furthermore, electromagnetism (qed) also has an interpretation as a curvature, as it is a gauge theory, just not a curvature of physical spacetime, and that does not disqualify if from being called a âforceâ.
With gravity wave detectors we are able to measure gravitational waves from two merging black holes distorting space-time even here on earth. The distortion is less than the width of the nucleus of an atom.
âWhat you do⌠is something that the whole universe is doing in the place you call âhere and nowâ.â Alan Watts
Thatâs called microgravity
So small, you canât see it without a microscope
Are you trying to say the people who spout generic bullshit about humans wrapped into arbitrary boxes are somehow related to actual physics where people do falsifiable experiments?
Because astrology didn't predict shit.
Astrology was just a way for astronomers to earn a living in the age when people didnât care about space. So there is overlap in that the same people would often practice both
It predicted Iâd be a scorpio
Why so unnecessarily aggressive
This is an interesting perspective and could have resulted in interesting discussion. Aggression alone isnât bad, but attacks on posters are bad.
Well, Proxima Centauri better stop pulling on me or Iâm going to smack it.
And they call it the weak force. Bah!
Gravity is different than the weak force.
A weak force? I know Iâve heard gravity described as the weakest force before⌠But I also got a D in physics so⌠đ¤ˇđťââď¸
radix@lemmy.world â¨8⊠â¨months⊠ago
Any given star is constantly emitting an unimaginably large, but finite, number of photons. A tiny few of them travel tens to hundreds of (Earth) years, only to end their journey in your eyeballs.
NOT_RICK@lemmy.world â¨8⊠â¨months⊠ago
Even crazier when you consider how long that photon bounced around inside the star before escaping out into space
LostXOR@fedia.io â¨8⊠â¨months⊠ago
Technically the photon is being absorbed and re-emitted inside the star, so it's not exactly the same photon.
rockerface@lemm.ee â¨8⊠â¨months⊠ago
Screw photons, neutrinos are where the real numbers start racking up
Jilanico@lemmy.world â¨8⊠â¨months⊠ago
And from the photonâs perspective, it all happened in an instant đ¤Ż