AbouBenAdhem
@AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
- Comment on Assuming humanity last another few hundred years; How many human languages do you think are gonna be left in 100 years? In 200 years? 1 day ago:
Once we get good, universal real-time translation, we might start to see a new proliferation of local languages. And of small groups inventing their own cryptolects for privacy, trying to evolve them faster than AI can keep up.
- Comment on Is there a word for when someone is not capable of, or doesn't try to understand verbal communication in a language, they are fluent in similar to functionally illiterate but for speech? 1 day ago:
Aphasia or aphrasia?
- Comment on Why did Montreal need to prove that it's a real place? What happened to the people who called it Montimaginary 1 week ago:
Montreal is just the real subspace of Montcomplex.
- Comment on I wonder what the Hapsburgs would have thought about pugs 2 weeks ago:
Probably the same way Putin feels about Dobby.
- Comment on It can be harder to surveil private conversations if everyone just used sign language. 2 weeks ago:
Sign language isn’t just another way of expressing English that can be picked up like learning a different alphabet or a secret code. It’s a full language with its own complete vocabulary, syntax, inflectional system, etc. that takes as long to learn as any other spoken language.
It would be great if more people knew it for the sake of communicating with the deaf, but as a means of foiling surveillance, there are many other approaches that would be more effective for less time investment.
- Submitted 2 weeks ago to showerthoughts@lemmy.world | 10 comments
- Comment on Why is it called "overseas" even if a dispora population move to a place connected by land? 3 weeks ago:
Before trains, sea travel was the standard way to travel long distances even if a land route was available. Sea voyages came to represent any destination that was far enough away that communities wouldn’t be in continuous contact.
- Comment on Maybe there was a cure for human cancer, but it didn't work at all in mice. 3 weeks ago:
Assuming that
-
human phenotypic traits that correlate more closely with mouse traits have more-predictable outcomes with mouse-tested medicine, and
-
more-predictable medical outcomes correlate with higher survival and reproductive rates,
can’t you plug that straight into the Price equation?
-
- Comment on Maybe there was a cure for human cancer, but it didn't work at all in mice. 3 weeks ago:
In the long run, using mice for medical testing will result in selection pressure for humans whose physiology more and more closely resembles that of mice.
- Comment on Is re-visiting a place of trauma a good idea? Have anyone done it? 3 weeks ago:
I don’t have any direct experience with that—but I’d say if you’re going to do it, do it with some friends and try to create some positive new experiences to overwrite the traumatic ones.
- Comment on Poetry is like a set of compression tools for meaning 3 weeks ago:
I’d say devices like metaphor and synecdoche are compression tools for meaning, and devices like rhyme and meter are checksums for error correction.
- Comment on What exactly is the reasoning behind Satan ruling Hell? 3 weeks ago:
Yeah—Milton’s Paradise Lost seems closer to the modern conception.
- Comment on A hotdog should be the opposite of a cool cat, but it's not. 3 weeks ago:
It’s like a double negative: a cool dog is the opposite of a hot dog, but a cool cat is the opposite of a cool dog, so you end up back where you started.
- Comment on Would it be correct to say that enshittification is the physical manifestation of the economic ai bubble bursting? 3 weeks ago:
I think that’s reversing cause and effect: the AI bubble is the result of the preexisting corporate practice of enshitification getting a new toy to play with.
- Comment on When kids come trick-or-treating, what happens if I choose trick? 3 weeks ago:
Immediate civilizational collapse.
- Comment on From what I've seen, public transit is either expensive and terrible or cheap and good. 4 weeks ago:
Yeah—ideally, fares only need to cover the marginal/fluctuating costs, not the fixed cost of the whole system.
For private transportation, fares need to pay for both, and generate a profit on top of that.
- Comment on From what I've seen, public transit is either expensive and terrible or cheap and good. 4 weeks ago:
Being good and being cheap are both indications that public transit is being properly funded. When funding is short, they have to raise fares and cut services.
- Comment on Would one run faster without arms? 4 weeks ago:
Additional weight makes it harder to accelerate, but once you’re up to a steady speed it doesn’t make so much difference.
On the other hand, using your arms as counterweights makes it possible to transfer more force from your foot to the ground with each step.
- Comment on Why do I need a domain to access my Funkwhale library but not SyncThing? 4 weeks ago:
Syncthing uses a centralized discovery server to connect device IDs to IP addresses (although you can change this to point to your own discovery server, too).
I don’t know if Funkwale has a similar option.
- Comment on Scientists Say We May Have Been Wrong About the Origin of Life 4 weeks ago:
The paper and the phys.org article are a year old—any guess why Popular Mechanics is reporting on it now?
- Comment on When did people start saying "have a good rest of your day" 4 weeks ago:
Sometime after sunrise.
- Comment on Sneaking snacks into the theater is objectively wrong if you are a movie fan 4 weeks ago:
If your criterion is that the theater isn’t making as much as they otherwise would, then failing to donation your entire paycheck to the theater is also “objectively wrong”.
I generally don’t eat in the theater anyway, but when I do I buy from the theater’s concessions… as a courtesy, not because I think it exemplifies some kind of objective morality.
- Comment on How many people would a generation ship need to have for inbreeding to not be an issue? 5 weeks ago:
There are actually two issues:
-
The most obvious effect of inbreeding is the increase in homozygosity for deleterious mutations, causing more birth defects.
-
A subtler effect is the loss of genetic diversity reducing a population’s ability to continue to evolve in response to future selection pressures. This would be especially important when migrating to a new environment with new selection pressures the species has never encountered before.
-
- Comment on If you eat free range eggs, you're probably ingesting trace amounts of rooster cum 5 weeks ago:
No—unless you’re eating eggs from your backyard hen, the eggs are unfertilized. Laying hens on commercial farms never even come into contact with roosters.
- Comment on Historians never talk about the "good old days". 5 weeks ago:
Nah—see Goodhart’s law (When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure).
As soon as Santa published his lists, people would start figuring out ways to game it.
- Comment on Historians never talk about the "good old days". 5 weeks ago:
Historians don’t talk about “good” or “bad” unless there’s some unambiguous measure in the historical context.
- Comment on The bourgeoisie could technically unintentionally end capitalism... 5 weeks ago:
There’s not much value in money that can only be used to purchase land/raw materials.
On the contrary—with automation converting raw materials to finished goods essentially for free, raw materials would be worth more than ever.
- Comment on The bourgeoisie could technically unintentionally end capitalism... 5 weeks ago:
There are still (some) consumers—other capitalists.
- Comment on The bourgeoisie could technically unintentionally end capitalism... 5 weeks ago:
Labor would become worthless, but money would still have value derived from ownership of capital (factories and raw materials). A tiny capitalist class would still produce and sell to each other, while the rest of humanity would be left with literally nothing to work with.
- Comment on What are the demands of the No Kings protests? What's the plan if they win? 5 weeks ago:
You’re not wrong—the protests in their current form aren’t going to achieve anything by themselves.
But adding some specific set of demands will accomplish even less: it will alienate supporters who don’t agree with all the demands, and it will allow Trump to claim to address the issues by cherry-picking and distorting the demands beyond recognition (see the Black Lives Matter protests a few years ago).
If we reach a critical point where mass protests can achieve some real, concrete good, it will be due to contingent circumstances that neither side was able to predict. But the contribution the current protests can make to that moment is to give everyone the confidence that the numbers are on their side, once a productive channel is found.