Speedy thing goes in, speedy thing comes out.
For those wanting a bit of a summary.
transmitting up to 22.9 petabits per second (Pb/s) through a single optic cable composed of multiple fibers
The breakthrough isn’t things moving faster but more fibers per cable. So you can transfer more bits in parallel.
That’s still a good breakthrough because, for lots of reasons, packing more fibers in isn’t as straight forward as one would think.
Gork@lemm.ee 11 months ago
Yay I can’t wait for Comcast to implement this so you can blow through your 1.2 TB data cap in a second so they can charge you $10 per every 50 GB that it goes over.
Ab_intra@lemmy.world 11 months ago
It still shocks me that they cap usage. There is no reason at all to do this. Why are they doing it?
DoomBot5@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Their network is under provisioned. They sell an apartment building 300mbps connections to all 8 tenants, but only have a 1Gb connection. To make sure that link isn’t always saturated, they impose a data cap to make you not want to use the bandwidth you’re paying for. On top of that everyone’s connection is crippled during hours like the evening when everyone is using it. As a bonus, they can sell you cable TV on top, so you don’t hit your data cap watching shows.
prole@sh.itjust.works 11 months ago
Are you kidding? Lol
Amends1782@lemmy.ca 11 months ago
The only reason its ever been, money
Signtist@lemm.ee 11 months ago
Because businesses exist to make money, so they have to balance charging as much money to the customers as they can without losing them to a competitive company. That used to mean that they had to treat customers with respect and make them want to stay with the buisness, but now they’ve realized that they can just pay lawmakers to let them have a monopoly, allowing them to charge as much money to the customers as they want without worrying that they’ll leave, since there’s either no competition for them to leave to, or the competition is using the same strategy, so leaving wouldn’t fix anything anyway.
wmassingham@lemmy.world 11 months ago
ISP shittiness aside, ISPs do actually pay for Internet backbone access by the byte. Usually there are peering agreements saying “you take 1tb of traffic from us, and we’ll take 1tb of traffic from you”, whether that traffic is destined for one of their customers (someone on Comcast scrolling Instagram), or they’re just providing the link to the next major node (Comcast being the link between AT&T’s segment of the US backbone and Big Mike’s Internet out in podunk Nebraska).
And normally that works pretty well, until power users start moving huge amounts of data and unbalancing the traffic.
gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 11 months ago
It’s illegal for them to cap it in some jurisdictions (e.g. Massachusetts, where I live).
random65837@lemmy.world 11 months ago
And that’s why I have FiOS even though I despise Verizon, and could save some money with Comcast.
CPMSP@midwest.social 11 months ago