A few days ago, I watched this short documentary, part of it covered Heliobiology, which the documentary said is an emerging field of science that began in Russia.
The Heliobiologists claimed that magnetic storms caused by solar flares cause all kinds of health problems in humans. Literally every health problem is named, from suicides, to heart attacks, to even terrorist attacks.
After Googling this and looking at some papers, I noticed a few things.
-
The papers find correlations between magnetic storms and some kind of negative health effect, and go on to heavily imply or say that negative health effect is caused by the magnetic storms.
-
Most of the papers I read on this mention “Schumann resonances”, and sometimes “pineal gland” crystals. Magnetism is always blamed, but the papers don’t go into detail. I saw one saying that since blood is magnetic, magnetic storms can cause heart attacks by disrupting blood flow.
-
Most of the papers are brand new, within the last few years.
blackris@discuss.tchncs.de 5 hours ago
Oh, you have done good to question this. It is a pseudoscience. I quickly slapped together an uncomplete list how to spot bullshit. Just from your description, I would say at least three boxes are checked here.
Overgeneralization: A single phenomenon is claimed to explain a wide range of unrelated issues.
One-size-fits-all solutions: A single treatment or method is said to cure multiple, diverse ailments.
Lack of specificity: Claims are vague and lack detailed mechanisms or explanations.
Appeal to tradition: Claims are based on historical practices rather than scientific evidence.
Extraordinary claims without extraordinary evidence: Bold assertions are made without sufficient proof.
Emphasis on personal testimonials: Reliance on individual stories rather than systematic research.
Use of jargon: Complex terminology is used to sound credible without substantive backing.
Avoidance of peer scrutiny: Claims are not subjected to rigorous testing or peer review.
Dichotomous thinking: Issues are framed in black-and-white terms, ignoring nuances and complexities.