Why the fuck false advertising is in quotes?
HP agrees million-dollar settlement over "false advertising" on PCs, keyboards
Submitted 1 month ago by cm0002@lemmy.world to technology@lemmy.world
Comments
Exec@pawb.social 1 month ago
skooma_king@lemm.ee 1 month ago
They don’t want to get sued, probably.
IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 1 month ago
“False news”
Grimy@lemmy.world 1 month ago
When you see quotes in headlines, it’s because someone said those exact words. Journalist don’t use the sarcastic “quotes”.
Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
“If you put everything in quotes is like other people said it and you can’t get in trouble.”
stevedice@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
4 million dollars
So, a slap on the wrist.
primemagnus@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
It’s not like HP is rolling in coin, but even for them $4m is probably less than they made from the actual infraction. Make it all make sense.
Decq@lemmy.world 1 month ago
These fines should really be based on the infraction profits times 100. To make sure you ripped out all benefits of doing these scams. Company goes bankrupt? Too bad. Why would we want to keep illegally operating businesses around anyway.
nulluser@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Cost of doing business.
kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
HP sucks, their products suck, and I hope they crash and burn
Retro_unlimited@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I had an HP laptop that melted, but they voided the warranty when I unplugged it to stop it melting.
I avoided their products since then. Fucking $1200 gone.
I also have an HP printer and if I were to ever use HP toner it’s over $1000 for the 4 toners. But the generics are way under $100.
I avoid HP!
kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
I once had a HP laptop, then the hinge got rougher, it became harder to open it up, then the screen popped off and the hinge broke
FawkesGil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
Good! Fuck HP and their anti-consumer practices!
Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Yeah ok I guess, but the fact that they settled means they likely would have had to pay much more had this gone to court.
PattyMcB@lemmy.world 1 month ago
As if I needed more reasons to dislike HP as a company
Ulrich@feddit.org 1 month ago
The lawsuit applies to customers who bought HP desktops, laptops, mice or keyboards advertised as being discounted for more than 75% of the time between June 5, 2021 and October 28, 2024.
One of the examples given was a $999.99 HP All-in-One machine bought by a plaintiff in September 2021. It was advertised as having $100 off, marked at $899.99, however it had been sold at that lower price since April 2021.
embed_me@programming.dev 1 month ago
Oh so many companies would be guilty of something like this
muusemuuse@lemm.ee 1 month ago
Hasn’t Kohl’s done this for years?
digger@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
Yes, and JC Penny crashed and burned after switching their marketing strategy away from fake “regular prices.”
jj4211@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Yeah, I read that. New leadership felt that the eternal sales stuff was bad and changed to “everyday low prices” sort of thing thinking the customers would appreciate the transparency. Nope, the fake “on sale” works.
It’s all over the place in sales across every industry. I think it is dumb but I am surprised someone actually got a judgement against it.
acosmichippo@lemmy.world 1 month ago
the difference is HP is the actual manufacturer who sets MSRP. I don’t think Kohls manufactures anything, they are just a retailer.
power@lemm.ee 1 month ago
clunker dunker blunker
axum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
Lol. 4 mil is absolutely nothing
Mooseford@lemmy.today 1 month ago
Dr. Evil would tend to disagree.
GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
MUAHAHAHAHA!