I can’t believe their secret game they gave to 10 thousand people got leaked
The Verge Under Fire For Publishing Info About ‘Deadlock,’ Valve’s Secret Shooter
Submitted 3 months ago by ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to games@lemmy.world
Comments
snailfact@infosec.pub 3 months ago
Arrkk@lemmy.world 3 months ago
I think the thing everyone is forgetting is that valve isn’t stupid, there’s no way they didn’t realize you could work around accepting the (legally unenforcable) NDA, and it’s open invite.
Valve 100% knows that keeping it “secret” is good for hype and was expecting this to happen at any time, and the nominal ban was expected, but nobody is gonna get sued either.
More people are talking about Valve’s “secret” new game because of this than would be if they openly announced it.
Carighan@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Yeah exactly. It’s quite likely they didn’t really blacklist The Verge anyways, just won’t send them invites any more for this particular game. Best kind of marketing is hype marketing, and this is how you fuel the hype.
corbin@infosec.pub 3 months ago
Yep, tech and game companies use invite-only systems to generate hype constantly. Bluesky is another recent example.
RangerJosie@sffa.community 3 months ago
What was so secret about it?
Cyv_@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 months ago
So apparently they had a bit asking players to not share info about the game, but you could technically back out of it without agreeing so legally they can post whatever they want. It feels like a case of “this is legal to do but maybe kinda shitty and valve might be upset”. Basically the agreement was informal and not enforceable and the verge just said fuck it. They did get banned afterwards, but I think that and not working with them in the future is all valve can do.
deegeese@sopuli.xyz 3 months ago
If 10,000 people are doing something, it is NOT secret, and journalists must report on it for the general benefit of society.
Valve has their head in the clouds if they thought they could keep an informal secret among the population of a small town.
Azzu@lemm.ee 3 months ago
There isn’t even an informal agreement. It simply says not to share anything. Not even “by playing this, you agree not to share anything”. It’s just “please don’t share anything”.
KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 3 months ago
Valve got burned many ages ago with Half-Life 2 and they only go to press about a game when it’s in the final phases of development, to release.
Carighan@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Bullshit. The actual reason will be that this is far better marketing once you’re at a level of Valve. Shit gets leaked anyways, might as well make it intentionally so to fuel the hype cycle.
Omega_Jimes@lemmy.ca 3 months ago
It’s just bad faith reporting. It reminds me of Kotaku sneaking into conventions before they opened to report what games were there.
It lowers my opinion of The Verge, I used to think they were at least reputable with standards, but that’s a real tabloid move.
meliante@lemmy.world 3 months ago
they were at least reputable with standards
I think you must be talking about a different website?
glitches_brew@lemmy.world 3 months ago
They literally included a screenshot of valve asking to not share information about the game with a little quip about how they pressed escape instead of ok. Blantant disrespect to valves wishes even if it’s not a legally binding agreement.
They chose getting clicks over doing right by valve. Shame on them.
slumberlust@lemmy.world 3 months ago
The verge has been paid advertising disguised as tech news for decades now. Arstechnica too.
Omega_Jimes@lemmy.ca 3 months ago
Isn’t it like just over ten years old?
chrischryse@lemmy.world 3 months ago
I used to think they were reputable until they came out with that PC building video
corbin@infosec.pub 3 months ago
They did ask Valve:
Though Valve didn’t respond to my requests for comment
helenslunch@feddit.nl 3 months ago
Clickbait title. I can’t find any justification for calling a player being banned as The Verge “under fire”.
reksas@sopuli.xyz 3 months ago
Decent thing to do would have been ask valve for time when they want the article published
corbin@infosec.pub 3 months ago
They did ask Valve:
Though Valve didn’t respond to my requests for comment
ccunning@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Why wouldn’t they just put journalists they gave access to under embargo?
edgemaster72@lemmy.world 3 months ago
It’s not clear if he got access from Valve or from a friend or someone else. The article simply states
Earlier today, I received a no-strings-attached invite to play Deadlock on Steam.
ccunning@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Ok - but they all originate from Valve, right? They couldn’t just put it behind a paywall or “NDA”wall?
KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 3 months ago
At the end of the day, the editors will have to answer to not receiving access to Valve for statements or tips moving forward.
timestatic@feddit.org 3 months ago
Honestly I don’t think valve is as mad as you would think
corbin@infosec.pub 3 months ago
Valve barely talks to press anyways, in a very similar fashion as Apple. At worst, maybe The Verge won’t get a Steam Deck 2 review unit ahead of time or something.
Linktank@lemmy.today 3 months ago
Too bad the game itself doesn’t sound very interesting.
arefx@lemmy.ml 3 months ago
Oh but it is very very fun. Addicting even. Full time job and business owner and in the last 5 weeks I’ve logged 125hrs.
simple@lemm.ee 3 months ago
125 hours already?! No wonder I sometimes play against people that feel like they’ve been playing it their entire life.
epicsninja@lemmy.world 3 months ago
It’s a MOBA at heart. I don’t like MOBAs, so I couldn’t stick with it.
Gerudo@lemm.ee 3 months ago
And at the end of the day…it’s just an ok game.
Carighan@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Have you tried it?
arefx@lemmy.ml 3 months ago
I have 125hrs and it’s amazing fun, has a high skill ceiling, isn’t an overwatch clone or anything remotely like that game.
It’s a mkba first third person shooter second.
Gerudo@lemm.ee 3 months ago
Preface that it is an early alpha build and everything can change.
Yes, I have played it. It is literally just a moba. It feels like they took Dota and slapped 5% of an fps to it. The matches can be way too long, and it suffers from the snowballing effect that if you don’t get a good start, it is really hard to be effective. If you are 10 mins in a match and getting outplayed, you probably arent going to enjoy the remaining 20-30 mins. If you took Dota and modded it with 1st person controls, you’d be almost there with this game.
There is some good. The vertical elements do help, and the jungle aspects, along with destroyables, do help somewhat to make up lost ground in your build. The art design is pretty good for being alpha, and I do enjoy the map. There are lots of crisscross paths and hidden areas. There are also some map mechanics that are fresh, like 1 way viewable smoke screens.
If you don’t like mobas, I’d almost guarantee you won’t like this. It’s not a new, genre defining experience, and it doesn’t pull enough fps features to make it different. 4/10 as it sits.
ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 3 months ago
Is Dota 2 with some shooter mechanics. If you like Dota 2 you probably like it, if you prefer a moba like LoL maybe you’ll not like it.
I played a couple of matches and to me the match go for too long.
tlou3please@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Eh. I find it difficult to have any sympathy for Valve. Sounds like it was only a matter of time before someone did this. If anything this is just free marketing.
PieMePlenty@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Valve gives you access to a game and tells you not to spew your mouth off. A gentleman’s agreement if you will.
You spew your mouth off and valve takes access away.
shocked pikachu face
This is a non-issue of you ask me. A person, who happens to be a writer, got access to the game through a steam friend and was asked not to talk about it but thought they could just not agree to a warning and write about it anyway? I got access too and i didnt write about the game. I get to go back and play it today, they cant.
timestatic@feddit.org 3 months ago
So what. They already have their article and it will be out anyways within like two years latest probably. The value of talking about deadlock is much higher and valve profits from this advertising as well.
Strykker@programming.dev 3 months ago
The so what is that this writer for the verge will likely never be trusted with NDA type pre-release access for any other games going forward, and this may even impact all of the Verge.
This isn’t just a one and done kind of issue, this will be seen by the entire industry as a “can’t trust that guy with pre-release access”
SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Except this is a game industry reputation ruined. It isn’t just valve, why would any dev ever give the verge access again knowing that they will not only disrespect your requests but bitch and moan if you hold them to it.
It’s a full rep killer. They will never have early access again for any company.
arudesalad@sh.itjust.works 3 months ago
Oh you have access? You got any spare referals? Asking for a friend with the friend code 998621885