Microsoft has 1 massive disadvantage when it tries to enter new markets.
It has to deal with brutal cutthroat competition from its worst enemy: Microsoft.
Ms internal politics destroy almost all its successes, their politics are why theyve never really been a threat, for every skype there’s a teams which cuts them off at the knees lest it cost a division head their chance at a promotion.
pdxfed@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Hey, RIM/Blackberry’s CEO went to mobile world Congress in 2010, 3 solid YEARS after the iPhone launched, was dominating and defining the smartphone world and said, “we feel touchscreen is not the future of mobile phones” and rolled out another hybrid touch/keyboard model like the 5 they already had
Blackberry was $150/share as of 2009 with the entire world in front of it. It’s now worth $3.59/share.
umbrella@lemmy.ml 3 weeks ago
to be fair i miss physical keyboards on phones. i wish we gave the space for it.
nl4real@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Same. Colossal pain in the ass.
kambusha@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
Get yourself a RIMjob and help bring them back
al_Kaholic@lemmynsfw.com 3 weeks ago
You could get a Bluetooth keyboard. Literally pick your size.
iopq@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
You have to charge it separately, it’s not quite as convenient
Soggy@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
I’d happily have a phone half an inch thicker if it meant a folding or sliding physical keyboard for my large hands.
prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
Netflix tried to get distribution in Blockbuster and a partnership w/them and were told to fuck off …
Samskara@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
Blackberry and Nokia were so slow to react to the iPhone, it was painful to watch.
pdxfed@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
And then, to bring us full circle to OP, Microsoft made it’s strategic acquisition of Nokia 😂 theverge.com/…/microsoft-nokia-acquisition-costs
rottingleaf@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Their stuff was better, but disadvantaged by public perception. A perfect storm one can say.
Samskara@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
Their stuff was significantly worse in user experience. Buttery smooth scrolling and highly reactive multi touch on a touch screen only device was revolutionary. Touch screens back then were known to be shitty to use. The competition to the iPhone were phones with tons of buttons, styluses and cumbersome user interfaces.
All previous players in the smartphone market Blackberry, Nokia, Palm, Windows mobile were slow to adapt and failed.
Palm’s webOS was competitive to iOS and in many ways superior. It failed because of mediocre hardware, bad carrier deals, and running out of money too quickly.
Google‘s Android succeeded despite sucking until about version 4 by willpower and deep pockets from Google.
The original introduction keynote for the iPhone was mindblowing back then.
iopq@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Intel thought the iPhone market was going to be too small so they didn’t agree to manufacture their CPUs
pdxfed@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
While also completely missing the boat on the potential of graphics cards and watching Nvidia and even AMD become massively more relevant in recent years.
Cocopanda@futurology.today 3 weeks ago
They’re a cyber security firm now. Wild stuff.
AtariDump@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
us.macmillan.com/books/…/losingthesignal/
rottingleaf@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
I think he felt right, but at the same time Blackberry wasn’t properly marketed.
And maybe having a touchscreen option would be good enough.