Let’s not make the same mistakes with AI that we made with social media

Submitted ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨dominiquec@lemmy.world⁩ to ⁨technology@lemmy.world⁩

https://www.technologyreview.com/2024/03/13/1089729/lets-not-make-the-same-mistakes-with-ai-that-we-made-with-social-media/

From the article: “In particular, five fundamental attributes of social media have harmed society. AI also has those attributes. Note that they are not intrinsically evil. They are all double-edged swords, with the potential to do either good or ill. The danger comes from who wields the sword, and in what direction it is swung. This has been true for social media, and it will similarly hold true for AI. In both cases, the solution lies in limits on the technology’s use.”

source

Comments

Sort:hotnew top

Boozilla@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
To steal an old trope: the tech bros have circled the globe eight times while the government is still putting its boots on. If there’s money to be made via automation, there’s no stopping it (unless we get the guillotines out of mothballs).

source
- ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  Someone will try to sell AI guillotines
  
  source
- Neato@ttrpg.network ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  The problem with any regulation is that it’s going to have unforeseen knock-on effects. It might cripple an otherwise benign use. This can be mitigated by trying to draft smart bills initially by coordinating with leaders in the field who aren’t corporate backers. And then being able and willing to amend laws as these effects take shape.
  
  Unfortunately this is not how the US congress functions right now and for the foreseeable future. Therefore regulation will likely be sparse and when it is heavy handed, unlikely to be amended unless the knock-on effects are massively bad.
  
  source
notannpc@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
There’s a better chance of AI becoming sentient and stopping itself from being harmful than there is that people do the right thing.

source
- blazeknave@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  Found Ultron everyone!
  
  source
aberrate_junior_beatnik@midwest.social ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Those who do learn from history are doomed to watch as those who didn’t repeat it.

source
TheFriar@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
See, this is the exact shit I mean when I scaremonger about AI. Especially in this community, I have been called a few names and likened to some stupid anti-tech movements.

But it’s not the tech itself. It’s the world and the companies this tech is being borne into and giving power to. This is not the early 80s, where we generally had some sort of capitalist equilibrium going on—as much as an exploitative system can have equilibrium, that is. It’s a post-Reagan 2024, and this system is so out of balance that this is like, in a war between a modernized society and an uncontacted Amazon people, a nuke was dropped.

Your cars, your phones, your entire online ecosystem, all the smart devices, the cops, the federal govt…they’re all working in a system of surveillance and—honestly, for lack of a better word, though it’s been co-opted and bastardized by conspiracy nut jobs—mind control that we barely understand, let alone have any control over. But that’s exactly what this is, they are astroturfing public opinion, pushing ideas in an almost streamlined fashion, and getting us evermore addicted to these means of coercion.

And this is all before we even discuss the general balance of “consumer/producer.” Assuming we are even willing to make capitalism come close to functioning (which is a fools errand at this point), we need to completely upend the current imbalance in what we accept as a suitable give/take. They are taking more, while giving us less, and it’s only getting much worse. Now they’re taking more than ever and we get, what, new social media sites in return? Nah. We are no longer consumers, we are products. We are the piece in the puzzle with the least agency.

And AI is only exacerbating those problems. And that’s all before we get into discussing the massive environmental concerns! We are barreling toward destruction and we are…sinking more computers and server farms and time and infrastructure to completely backwards energy consumers.

Don’t use their AI, refuse to use social media, jailbreak and privatize your phones, refuse to buy any surveillance nightmare cars, use a TOR browser…do everything we can to wrench just a little of our own data and agency back from them. Because getting all giddy over some shitty chatbot and refusing to heed the warnings of the Reddit and google CEOs literally spelling out how they are harvesting and profiling our data is just beyond stupid and gives them the idea that, as the google ceo said, “well, if you keep using it, it’s your own fault.” Or something to that effect. But at some point, these evil cartoon villains may just be right. We keep following along. At what point do we build parallel systems to evade their reach?

source
Dasnap@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
Let’s make different, more disastrous mistakes!

source
- isthingoneventhis@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  Climb in back and we’ll be off!
  
  source
LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
Social media is just another scapegoat like Russian bots.

The truth is much worse: most people are, and have always been awful, bloodthirsty ghoulish pieces of shit.

source
- DaMonsterKnees@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  No friend, no, I’m sorry, but the whole world just wouldn’t work if that were actually the case. Humanity is inherently altruistic. The issue is that people struggle to be that and survive. We just have to ramp down the me:first and push more for society. EU is starting to make those in-roads, so stay positive!
  
  source
  - fishos@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    World Hunger is literally a problem of corruption. The vast majority of problems are “we could solve this, but it costs money and we’d rather have another mega yacht”. If humans were truly altruistic, homelessness and hunger wouldn’t be issues at all. Are we savages? Maybe not. But overall altruistic? Bullshit.
    
    source
  - BearOfaTime@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    I’d say it’s that we all have these elements within us.
    
    We’re all born as selfish idiots, how can we be otherwise? We’re helpless at birth, thrust from perfect comfort and safety into discomfort, utterly ignorant and wholly dependent, with no knowledge there are others, who are just as dependent when they’re born.
    
    There’s the variability in personality, but by and large we have to learn to see others as the same as ourselves.
    
    So while we may not all actively try to be assholes, it takes conscious effort to be better than our base nature.
    
    And, I tend to think we all get to be assholes now and again. We all have moments we can look back on and say “oh, yea, I was the asshole that time”.
    
    Social media just reflects humanity, though the algorithms are certainly designed to increase engagement via the simplest mechanisms - emotional engagement. And which are the easiest to target? Yep - the most basic, they have the broadest appeal, because we all share those base emotions.
    
    source
- AtHeartEngineer@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  So many people on Lemmy are pessimistic as shit, makes it hard to read the comments sometimes
  
  source
- aberrate_junior_beatnik@midwest.social ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  Technology and policy matter. nytimes.com/…/facebook-refugee-attacks-germany.ht…
  
  source
- Neato@ttrpg.network ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  
  most people are, and have always been awful, bloodthirsty ghoulish pieces of shit
  
  Most people are empathetic and decent. This sounds like apologia or projection. Evil people think everyone else is just as evil and that’s how they rationalize it.
  
  source
- lurch@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  It is one side of us humans. You don’t become top of the food chain by petting the lions.
  
  However, the other side is: We can team up and watch each others backs.
  
  source
CriticalMiss@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
Hello, I’m from the future. We didn’t handle it responsibly.

source
CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
Or… hear me out… we use AI to make social media even more insufferable than it was before.

source
- BakerBagel@midwest.social ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  So excited to have an llm make posts on Twitter for me, so that all my bot followers can think i am funny
  
  source
- SandbagTiara2816@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  Already happening, friend
  
  source
Alexstarfire@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
Ohh we will. And include all new mistakes too. Gotta cover our bases.

source
wise_pancake@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
We have two ethics systems:

The first we apply to healthcare and government, and it’s best sunned up by Micheal Scott “Don’t ever, for any reason, do anything to anyone, for any reason, ever, no matter what. No matter… where. Or who, or who you are with, or, or where you are going, or… or where you’ve been… ever. For any reason, whatsoever.”,

The second is applied to private industry, and it’s best summed up by “innocent, until proven guilty”.

And that’s why we let private industry roll along with whatever they want, until we can definitively prove harm, but society found it unreasonable to ask people to vaccinate because there was a minute chance of rare side effects less bad than the disease it was for.

source
- blazeknave@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  Citizens United
  
  source
Breve@pawb.social ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
Hahah but really AI is already being used to amplify and exploit all the problems of social media to new levels. It was nice while it lasted, but we can’t stuff this all back in Pandora’s box.

source
ech@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
Way too late. All of the harmful parts of social media are exploited and promoted by corporate interests, and llms are shaping up the same. Users have already shown they have no interest in policing themselves, so unless something is done to drastically restrain corporations, there’s little that can or will be done to keep the new thing from being even worse than the old thing.

source
Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
Bahahahahahha, NEVER gonna happen.

Humanity learning from its mistakes, I mean.

source
Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
“Advertising, surveillance, virality, lock-in, monopolization”

Of course advertising will be used for all those things and probably already is.

source
Even_Adder@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
Meanwhile, reports commissioned by the state department suggesting publishing weights be made illegal, so corporations can have their monopoly of a public technology.

source
dan1101@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
I saw an IBM commercial that depicted an AI personal assistant informing a user that their credit card had been used for a fraudulent charge. It asked the user if a particular charge was legit and they said no. Then the AI informed the user that the transaction had been canceled and a new card had been issued.

I have a couple problems with this. First, what if the AI was hallucinating parts of this interaction? Secondly, at some point the user’s AI will be interfacing with the bank’s AI, then we will effectively be subservient to a bunch of algorithms automatically running the world and we will basically be children with our AI parents taking care of us.

source
TigrisMorte@kbin.social ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
You mean the part where we assume rich People have our best interests at heart and are trying to help?

source
autotldr@lemmings.world [bot] ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
This is the best summary I could come up with:

When major brands like Uber and Procter & Gamble recently slashed their digital ad spending by the hundreds of millions, they proclaimed that it made no dent at all in their sales.

As Jonathan Swift once wrote, “Falsehood flies, and the Truth comes limping after it.” Academics seem to have proved this in the case of social media; people are more likely to share false information—perhaps because it seems more novel and surprising.

The incentives in the tech sector are so spectacularly, blindingly powerful that they have enabled six megacorporations (Amazon, Apple, Google, Facebook parent Meta, Microsoft, and Nvidia) to command a trillion dollars each of market value—or more.

The expansive role of these technologies in our daily lives gives for-profit corporations opportunities to exert control over more aspects of society, and that exposes us to the risks arising from their incentives and decisions.

In addition to strengthening and enforcing antitrust law, we can introduce regulation that supports competition-enabling standards specific to the technology sector, such as data portability and device interoperability.

And with a looming presidential election, conflict spreading alarmingly across Asia and Europe, and a global climate crisis, it’s easy to imagine that we won’t get our arms around AI any faster than we have (not) with social media.

The original article contains 2,953 words, the summary contains 211 words. Saved 93%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

source
gapbetweenus@feddit.de ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
We haven’t figured out how to deal with social media at all. We will make even worse mistakes with AI, that’s just how we are as humans.

source
pennomi@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
This article mostly ignores the one thing that actually makes social media harmful in a way that is unique to social media: addictiveness, and the ultimate mental health decline that comes from scrolling through a feed and getting tiny dopamine hits all day.

This is distinct from “virality,” since is more related to the idea that we’ve optimized for “engagement”. It is inevitable that AI will be tuned for that very soon, and we will find that AI is addictively engaging a lot sooner than it is correct.

source