Or maybe they will launch Win 12 with optional TPM support.
Imho making the OS(es) TPM only cannot be good for their business, many people are still on Win 10 with no intention to switch, since their motheboard does not support TPM and do not want to upgrade PC / waste PCI-E slot on TPM extension.
BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 11 months ago
After using Windows for 30+ years now (since Windows 1), this is one of the straws finally pushing me into Linux.
I’m running 10, but without a TPM, can’t go to 11. So sad. Not.
Honestly 7 was the last decent OS they made. In my opinion the good OS’s were NT4 (game changer), 2000, XP, 7. They can keep the rest.
fox2263@lemmy.world 11 months ago
You can use the Rufus USB flashing tool with the Windows 11 iso and it will remove the TPM requirement and others.
c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Rufus is the shit, love Rufus.
Dumbkid@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 months ago
Yeah I have windows 11 on multiple computers without secure boot or tpm enabled
BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 11 months ago
Oh that’s neat. Thanks!
Adequately_Insane@lemmy.world 11 months ago
If I was not using my PC for gaming also, I would probably say fuck then and be on Linux too. But gaming on Linux is cancer.
Rootiest@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Your information is outdated
PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 11 months ago
you got a lot of hate because Lemmy tends to be militantly pro-Linux, (it sort of goes hand-in-hand with the FOSS ideas that Lemmy is built on) but every Linux user who built their own rig has wanted to throw their computer out the fucking window while trying to get nvidia drivers to work.
Linux gamers point to the Steam Deck as the example that gaming on Linux isn’t awful… The Steam Deck is an amazing advancement, but it’s essentially just a console like the Xbox or PlayStation; It’s using a known list of hardware, with pre-installed and pre-tested drivers. As far as play-testing and QA is concerned, that’s as close as you can get to having a controlled environment. For people who build their own computers, drivers on Linux are still a fucking nightmare. You still occasionally have to fight with them just to get modern games working.
It’s better than it used to be, for sure. But it’s nowhere near as easy as many people want to claim. Especially when compared to Windows, where it usually is just plug and play. Microsoft can suck a chode for their invasive and monopolistic practices, but those same practices are also what led to gaming being so fucking easy on Windows. You buy the game, you install the game, and the game boots up first try. Because companies test for Windows. They know what to expect from Windows. They know how hardware will perform on Windows, and what the potential pitfalls will be. None of that is true for Linux, where the OS varies just as much as the user’s hardware.
Rentlar@lemmy.ca 11 months ago
Do you only play Valorant and Rainbow 6 Siege? Most of my games work now by simply clicking Play, which wasn’t the case even 2 years ago.
Molecular0079@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Anyone gonna tell him about the Steam Deck?
nickknack@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Not so much anymore, it’s apparently improved significantly and getting better all the time. Check out /c/linux_gaming . A lot of avid proponents there given the shitshow M$FT has made of Windows.
beerclue@lemmy.world 11 months ago
I have 300+ games in my Steam library, some of them with Linux builds, just a few. The rest work with Proton. I did not find a game yet that didn’t work on Linux…
mesamunefire@lemmy.world 11 months ago
It’s so easy to run on Linux now. Lol what are you doing?
noorbeast@lemmy.zip 11 months ago
May I ask why you think so, Steam Deck is built on Arch Linux?
jordanlund@lemmy.world 11 months ago
That’s what the Steam Deck is for. ;)
MyNamesNotRobert@lemmynsfw.com 11 months ago
I game on Linux and don’t even have Windows installed. If a game doesn’t work, I refund and it isn’t worth playing. I just don’t care.
Toes@ani.social 11 months ago
3.1 and 98se were pretty decent at the time too.
BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 11 months ago
Yea, 3.11 was a significant change. It was still just dos with a shell.
A usable shell, which was quite new for the time.
db2@sopuli.xyz 11 months ago
3.11 with win32s
KrummsHairyBalls@lemmy.ca 11 months ago
Not only is it easy to bypass the TPM requirement, but literally all modern CPUs have the ability to enable software TPM, or you can buy a hardware TPM for a few bucks.
It’s funny that you’ll go through the trouble of messing with Linux instead of just flipping a switch in your BIOS.
jaidyn999@lemm.ee 11 months ago
All the current major distros of linux require TPM.
TPM prevents users from downloading random kinder eggs that install ransomware. Any business that disables TPM is crazy.
Chobbes@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Why do you say a TPM prevents users from running malicious hardware? As far as I know that’s not really what they’re used for.
bruhduh@lemmy.world 11 months ago
I’d like to see how you disable tpm on 2010s thinkpad where tpm don’t even exist
teft@startrek.website 11 months ago
Oh windows 2000 how I miss thee.
legios@aussie.zone 11 months ago
I honestly think it’s the best OS they released. Shame so many games would throw a shitfit at the time because it reported it was Windows NT (rightfully so).