Engineering - Apple iPad Security - GNU/Hurd Mobile Flatscreen Medical - MS Surface TNG 10 Front - Samsung FuchsiaPad
And none of them are interoperable. Did you really think they would solve that in the future?
iPadd
Submitted 11 months ago by FlyingSquid@lemmy.world to risa@startrek.website
https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/605dd8e7-fb96-4f1a-8793-d9149099cab1.png
Comments
McKay@feddit.de 11 months ago
Gabu@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Considering that Star Trek’s Earth is a communist utopia, I would expect so, yes.
GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 11 months ago
I recently read an interesting argument that the federation isn’t in fact communist, but basically something beyond our current economic concepts.
We have:
- explicit self determination, individualism and self fulfillment are held in the highest regard, so much so that it is considered the objective of life to find personal fulfillment and in doing so, giving back to society
- post scarcity economy, everyone can have any material need fulfilled at any time by virtue of replicators. Though many goods and commodities are still produced in the traditional way to provide a better quality product (how is this limited amount allocated?)
- Money is not used internally, but the federation has no objection to using it for commerce with other cultures. There is also indication for power tied credit system that federation citizens are subject to, for example for complex replication and transport
- being a merchant or trader, or rather generally seeking profit and material wealth are, while considered outdated by most, not offensive or even illegal within the federation. There is plenty of evidence for private enterprise, for example the publishing studio that distributes the doctor’s holo novel in VOY
And many more, even contradictory to our current day minds, aspects that put the federation system and ideology someplace further than our current concepts.
possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 11 months ago
I’m sorry, what?
FiskFisk33@startrek.website 11 months ago
post-scarcity, not communist.
FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Why would each area of the ship need to use a different brand or model of device?
That’s sure not how military ships work now.
marcos@lemmy.world 11 months ago
They all run Syncthing and KDE Connect. What more interoperability you could expect is probably about things those devices won’t even allow you to do.
BeardedSingleMalt@startrek.website 11 months ago
My headcanon is that some of the PADDs are 1-time use with read only memory that can’t have the data loaded or transferred off it. A secure way of passing information.
ummthatguy@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Just chuck them into a matter recycler when finished. No messy piles of old PADDs. Unless you’re Sloan from Section 31.
I know this is in his head, but in all likelihood how he really kept his notes.
Honytawk@lemmy.zip 11 months ago
That is one way to not get hacked I suppose
dejected_warp_core@startrek.website 11 months ago
Reminds me of the paper printouts in the very earliest TOS episodes. Like, what do you do when you run out of paper in deep space? And do you really have the storage for 5 years worth of computer printouts? Logistically, even an etch-a-sketch makes more sense.
aeronmelon@lemm.ee 11 months ago
Yeah, it’s commonly thought to have something to do with security. Similar to chain of custody for criminal evidence.
Engineering compiles a department report for the captain. The Shift Lead puts the data on a PADD, then gives that PADD to the Chief Engineer. The Chief Engineer signs the data with their command code and notes that it is PADD-1217. That data then becomes locked to that PADD. Someone from Engineering is assigned to take PADD-1217 to the bridge and hand deliver it to the Captain. The Captain receives the PADD, reviews the report, confirms that they are holding PADD-1217, and signs the report with their command code. Someone from Engineering is sent to retrieve the PADD, and re-deliver it to the Chief Engineer. The Chief Engineer confirms the PADD was read and signed by the Captain and transfers the signed data to the computer core to be logged and archived. The Chief Engineer then confirms all data on the PADD has been transferred and erased, then stores the PADD until it is needed again.
This is why it’s common to see a pile of PADDs on the Captain’s desk. Each department is sending their own secure report on their own PADD.
Sharpiemarker@feddit.de 11 months ago
Like all predictions about future technology, Star Trek was both right and way off.
Padds are almost used like portable storage devices. Want to give someone a book? Load it onto a padd for them.
ummthatguy@lemmy.world 11 months ago
But who wants to deal with searching through the UI for pertinent info when you can have several PADDs each attuned to a specific set of data?
Kolanaki@yiffit.net 11 months ago
They can even have their own special UI! The way they talk about reconfiguring panels makes it seem like you can build your own UI on the fly, especially the time Worf yelled at a dude who put the con controls in the engine room of the defiant and didn’t use the standard layout.
FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 months ago
I’m more amused by Jake writing his stories on a PADD with a stylus, but you see it and it’s all printed text.
HairHeel@programming.dev 11 months ago
My desk has a desktop with two monitors, a laptop, an iPad, and a phone. I use each of them for different reasons throughout a day.
TBH the only reason I have so few devices laying around is because they’re expensive. If I lived in a post-scarcity society, I’d have a lot more tablets on my desk.
Anticorp@lemmy.world 11 months ago
It’s very amazing to me that we have better tablets today than they had on TNG, yet we’re further from space exploration today than we were when TNG was being made.
JWBananas@startrek.website 11 months ago
Never forget Voyager, where Torres could invent a brand new method of transporter lock and implement it on-the-fly all through a console on the bridge, but even the bio-neural gel packs weren’t smart enough to get a power requisition down to the bottom decks without someone putting it into a padd and physically walking it down there.
DmMacniel@feddit.de 11 months ago
Power requisitions need the Human touch. And human germs.
ElBarto@sh.itjust.works 11 months ago
It made sense a few years ago, but come on, how many portable devices with large screens do we have now?
Plus if I could replicate 10 iPads so I could have a page open on each to make research easier, I’d do it. What’s better, having to switch between tabs or apps, or just grabbing a pad with the info ready to cross reference.
ummthatguy@lemmy.world 11 months ago
lunatic@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 months ago
I must be the only person on the planet who doesn’t feel the need to have a septillion screens 🤷♀️
dejected_warp_core@startrek.website 11 months ago
$0.02:
We used to get plenty done with much less screen area, so there’s isn’t really a driving need, per-se. There’s nothing wrong with that workflow, even today.
That said, more pixels does enable some useful possibilities. IMO, the major difference comes down to using your peripheral vision (which wasn’t possible before) and less background tasking. Both converge on less cognitive load since you don’t need a mental map of what’s in the background (everything is “foreground” now). Instead, you can scan your immediate environment (screen real-estate, physical devices, etc) to find what you want. And I think it’s ultimately a matter of taste: some people will find that overwhelming instead of helpful or useful.
lunatic@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 months ago
Not a bad take, your $0.02 is worth more than a lot of other people’s (not saying the takes here are bad, just a general statement). I’m far, far on the opposite end of the extreme of some people in this thread; I was comfortable on a single 11" MacBook Air screen". Part of that is certainly my ADHD/autism, in that I can hyperfocus on the thing that’s in the foreground and just swap everything else to disk when I’m not looking at it. I appreciate the recognition that it is all about taste; so many folks tend to state their preferences like they’re objective fact.
FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 months ago
No, I’m with you. I think it’s needless most of the time. People are arguing uses, but Star Trek really takes it to a needless level. I remember an episode of, I think, TNG where someone has to be trained and is given a big box of PADDs to read. Jake has a different PADD for everything he writes.
I have a two monitor system on my desktop and I do use all of that desktop space, but there’s a limit to how many screen I could see myself ever needing.
And really, you would think Starfleet would come up with something more efficient.
Little_mouse@lemmy.ca 11 months ago
Honestly if I could just print up a new tablet instantly and without cost, I would have half a dozen around me when I am deep into a research fugue.
Being able to quickly and easily flip between books or articles (or even different sections of the same book) while at the same time keeping the existing information up on a screen that I can directly reference is great.
ummthatguy@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Why are there 4 browsers split between 2 monitors with dozens of tabs a piece?
Image
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 11 months ago
I’m starting to feel limited at two monitors and I think I have a problem. I don’t even know what I’d use #3 for yet, I just would like to have options.
FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 months ago
I can see it used for that sort of thing, but they pass them around like they’re post-it notes.
EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 11 months ago
They apparently put the human element back into communications by having a third party physically carry the message like pre-screen eras. For reasons, you see.
Endorkend@kbin.social 11 months ago
I have a 42inch curved 4K main monitor.
It's fucking huge.
Still have 2 27 inch ones in portrait to each side for documentation and browsing.
Honytawk@lemmy.zip 11 months ago
Rather have 4x 21" screens though.
Much easier to organise all the different windows that way.
dejected_warp_core@startrek.website 11 months ago
That sounds amazing. Honest question: how much more screen would it take before a full VR setup would seem more practical? Not everyone has a battlestation like this, and I’m genuinely curious where the line is. Thank you.