Why YSK: Trackers don’t do good for anyone except the platform, and they’re not necessary to view the content in the URL.
It’s courteous to not subject the recipient (most likely your friends and family) to this tracking. You’re already sending them to the platform, which is tracking them in other ways. But you can help reduce that tracking by removing everything after the ampersand in the URL. Here are some examples.
Twitter example
URL: x.com/CookieSlayers/status/1623712884902567937?s=…
The s=20
is a Twitter-specific parameter to show that the tweet was copied from the web app. s=46
is iOS, and I can’t remember what Android’s code is. This is a relatively clean link, but there are some links that’ll concatenate unique identifiers, like: x.com/CookieSlayers/status/1623712884902567937?s=….
In this case, you’ll notice there’s also a &t=
parameter, which is a unique identifier to the person who shared it.
The only part of the URL you need is https://x.com/CookieSlayers/status/1623712884902567937
.
Instagram example:
URL: www.instagram.com/reel/CzP877du2EB/?igshid=MzRlOD…
The only part of the URL you need is https://www.instagram.com/reel/CzP877du2EB
.
TikTok example
URL: www.tiktok.com/…/7301348328602717482?is_from_weba…
You’ll notice TikTok’s is a lot more readable in terms of what the URL contains.
The is_from_webapp
parameter is self-explanatory, as is the sender_device
, and then there’s the identifier that’s unique to you. In this case, 7302915057791436331
.
The only part of the URL you need is https://www.tiktok.com/@inthepaintcrew/video/7301348328602717482
.
The best route^1^ would be to use privacy-respecting frontends, but if you don’t, simply deleting everything after the ampersand goes a long way.
^1^The best route would actually be to not use/reward platforms that are literally destroying humanity, but we’re not there yet, so… in the meantime, let’s just try to decrease the tracking and stop subjecting our friends and family to it as much as possible.
slazer2au@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Tldr, anything after a ‘?’ In a url is unnecessary.
Nemo@midwest.social 11 months ago
Not always, but it’s a good rule of thumb.
otter@lemmy.ca 11 months ago
It’s getting worse though
Recently I’ve noticed Reddit links from friends looking like
reddit.com/r/example/s/1234567
Which then redirects to the actual
reddit.com/r/example/post/comments/1938473
I believe Spotify and Tiktok do short links like that too. If you’re on android, URLCheck can wrangle those links to find the actual content without the trackers. On web / iOS, I’m not sure
example@reddthat.com 11 months ago
I haven’t checked how reddit does this but just from the example or seems like there is no anti tracking from the use of urlcheck that you’re describing.
reddit appears to generate tracking link with a specific numeric identifier in their database, so instead of attaching a bunch of removable url parameters they instead do a lookup in their database and then redirect to the original destination.
this also means your app checking the redirect will need to fetch the url to determine the destination, which means their tracking still works just fine.
Sanity_in_Moderation@lemmy.world 11 months ago
On YouTube, adding &t=37s makes the video start at 37 seconds in. It is pretty useful.
That is the full extent of my coding knowledge.
Sanity_in_Moderation@lemmy.world 11 months ago
I don’t know why “amp;” appeared. I didn’t write it and it is not necessary. It’s just the and symbol. Followed by t=__s
ilinamorato@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Not true on every site. Try it in your browser without the query string first before assuming that’s the case. The app I work on, for instance, uses the query string to set date/time ranges and filter data.
lolcatnip@reddthat.com 11 months ago
Except when it’s not.
Eagle0110@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Though I’ve always wondered if that’s always consistently the case, and when that’s not the case is there any mostly consistent way to identify the separator symbol in the URL text strings :/