Criminals say their crimes should not be investigated - full story at 11.
Internet providers say the FCC should not investigate broadband prices
Submitted 1 year ago by CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world to technology@lemmy.world
Comments
Veraxus@kbin.social 1 year ago
HubertManne@kbin.social 1 year ago
I mean criminals do know a lot about crime. maybe they are right?
dojan@lemmy.world 1 year ago
If you just leave the criminals alone and let them do as they please they’ll regulate themselves. A criminal justice system is just unnecessary and expensive administrative overhead. It stifles the free market.
Donjuanme@lemmy.world 1 year ago
No no, there’s no need to look in that room. Should absolutely raise suspicion.
thefartographer@lemm.ee 1 year ago
“Why does that room smell like rotting corpses?”
“No clue, let’s promise to be friends forever by agreeing to never go into or ask about that room ever again!”
captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 year ago
And police say that nobody should investigate police brutality
PetDinosaurs@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I’m hoping most of big tech and media get broken up
It’s just hope though.
EatYouWell@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Unlikely since the FTC keeps letting them merge.
And it’s not just tech. Pretty much everything you buy is from a brand that’s owned by one of a handful of companies.
yabai@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I mean that’s not really true. The new FTC chair literally got the position by writing a paper on why Amazon should be broken up, and has raised numerous cases to stop recent M&A activity. One Meta/FB acquisition of a VR company, the Microsoft Blizzard/Activision buyout, among others. They’ve been shut down a lot by the courts.
captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Yeah I bet both halves of my scrotum they say that.
SwiffyD@lemmy.world 1 year ago
There is no war in Ba Sing Se.
bappity@lemmy.world 1 year ago
jmd_akbar@aussie.zone 1 year ago
Yup. Totally not a suspicious statement from them…
ornery_chemist@mander.xyz 1 year ago
♪ How 'bout I do ANYWAY ♪
psycho_driver@lemmy.world 1 year ago
lol classic NotTheOnion material
rusticus@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Is Trump the new Internet provider spokesperson?
autotldr@lemmings.world [bot] 1 year ago
This is the best summary I could come up with:
In 2021, Congress required the Federal Communications Commission to issue rules “preventing digital discrimination of access based on income level, race, ethnicity, color, religion, or national origin” within two years.
FCC Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel last month released her draft plan to comply with the congressional mandate and scheduled a November 15 commission vote on adopting final rules.
Carr described Rosenworcel’s proposal as “President Biden’s plan to give the administrative state effective control of all Internet services and infrastructure in the US.”
In a meeting with Rosenworcel’s staff, cable company executives “stated that the Draft Order would impose overbroad liability standards that impede further broadband investment and are legally vulnerable by adopting a disparate impact rather than a disparate treatment liability approach,” according to an ex parte filing submitted yesterday by cable lobby group NCTA-The Internet & Television Association.
The cable companies said the FCC "should define digital discrimination as disparate treatment and should limit the standard to policies and practices involving the deployment of broadband network facilities.
“Commission evaluation of price is unnecessary in the competitive wireless marketplace and may deter offering discounts and enticements to switch providers that consumers enjoy today.”
The original article contains 688 words, the summary contains 192 words. Saved 72%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
roo@lemmy.one 1 year ago
I caught a trespasser the other day that said it wasn’t him. Totally believed him too /s
Taleya@aussie.zone 1 year ago
Pay nooo attention to the man bahind the curtain!!
jherazob@kbin.social 1 year ago
Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain
TheHylianProphet@startrek.website 1 year ago
Sadly, it probably won’t be looked into. ISP’s are at a “too big to fail” point in the US, and that let’s them do pretty much whatever they want. Like airlines.
Chariotwheel@kbin.social 1 year ago
Oh, okay then
thesohoriots@lemmy.world 1 year ago
“What IS your fascination with my forbidden closet of mysteries?”
penquin@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Yup, because they have infinite shit to hide 😂
octavio_dingus@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Then it’s pretty clear that’s exactly what they should do.
CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Anytime big corporations say this, I just kind of laugh and say, “So…you have nothing to hide, right?”
Nommer@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
It reminds me of a kid telling their parents not to check in something because they know they’ll get in trouble.
admiralteal@kbin.social 1 year ago
Privacy rights only exist for megacorps.
Synthead@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Is it… utility time??