It truly has one hole, in that it eats, has a digestive sack, and then vomits the poop
omg hes just like me
Submitted 6 hours ago by restingOface@quokk.au to [deleted]
https://quokk.au/static/media/posts/cb/sY/cbsYdmgwL0AQj1D.jpg
Comments
Nikls94@lemmy.world 3 hours ago
icelimit@lemmy.ml 1 minute ago
If the hole doesn’t go through, it is only a pocket, typographically identical to a plate.
mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 2 hours ago
vomits the poop
have had norovirus, know that feel
libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 3 hours ago
Exist for no reason? All life has a purpose, and that is to poop. The excrement speaks for itself.
ParadoxSeahorse@lemmy.world 7 minutes ago
Poop is subsistence, Sex is persistence
FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world 2 hours ago
It sounds like it doesn’t have a poop hole
BCsven@lemmy.ca 6 hours ago
exists for no clear reason Sounds like Humans
sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 6 hours ago
Sounds like everything, if you’re leaning nihilist.
Denjin@feddit.uk 4 hours ago
Nihilists! Fuck me! I mean, say what you want about the tenets of National Socialism Dude, at least it’s an ethos!
sroos@lemmy.world 5 hours ago
It also only has one hole, which, if you ask some topologists, is what humans have.
meekah@discuss.tchncs.de 5 hours ago
I thought most humans are 7 holes
endless_nameless@lemmy.world 3 hours ago
I don’t think any natural thing exists for a reason. That’s reserved for things made with intention by sentient beings.
wuffah@lemmy.world 3 hours ago
If it has at least one hole, then it exists for a reason. ;)
GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 2 hours ago
is that a living fleshlight?
dogs0n@sh.itjust.works 2 hours ago
This is a place for science! Not (your deepest) fantasy!
lung@lemmy.world 6 hours ago
It’s the roomba of the sea
felixwhynot@lemmy.world 6 hours ago
Scientists do love to talk about worms
This has some details: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xenacoelomorpha?wprov=sfti1…
TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 5 hours ago
Bit of clarification: Xenacoelomorpha is the phylum that the genus Xenoturbella is under.
Someone left a tag at the top of the Xenacoelomorpha article advocating a rewrite, which I could probably quickly investigate right now (or even just check WoRMS) if I weren’t currently a lazy lump of dead weight. Without assessing the tag’s merits, I’d at least advise treading lightly as a heuristic.
FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world 2 hours ago
Doesn’t belong. Too lame!
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 hours ago
recently the phylogenetic studies place this with another unusual bilaterian animal( very basal animals(Post-sponge creatures), they couldnt figure out which things this is related to.
finallymadeanaccount@lemmy.world 3 hours ago
Sounds like the pinnacle of evolution.
db2@lemmy.world 6 hours ago
No clear reason? It’s because the thing can successfully make more of itself before dying. That’s literally it.
See also: ticks
lauha@lemmy.world 4 hours ago
No animal has reason to exist.
GameOverFlow@lemmy.zip 2 hours ago
*nothing has
dogs0n@sh.itjust.works 2 hours ago
As an animal myself, I’d like to object.