I mean, he’s bad, but he’s not Hitler
The jokes write themselves...
Submitted 8 hours ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to science_memes@mander.xyz
https://mander.xyz/pictrs/image/41901412-f188-4f87-b41f-cb1042f221c9.jpeg
Comments
Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 hour ago
dharmacurious@slrpnk.net 3 hours ago
Now, I’m aware that I’m on the science memes comm right now, and that you’re all much smarter and more enlightened and mature and shit.
But that dudes name is hitler and not one of you has said a word about it, and I find that very disappointing.
BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz 3 hours ago
Isn’t that the joke ?
Paragone@lemmy.world 7 hours ago
I think that Retraction Watch needs to do an institution leaderboard, to highlight which are the most, & least, corrupt institutions, because corruption’s a cultural thing, not merely an individual-thing.
_ /\ _
Grimy@lemmy.world 7 hours ago
Put this guy on suicide watch and keep him away from his niece.
flandish@lemmy.world 7 hours ago
curious - as i have only worked in the data pipeline side of research and cohort generation - is it not ok for a researcher to cite their prior work if said work is post peer review?
The_v@lemmy.world 6 hours ago
It’s normal to cite your own work if the new paper is a continuation of that research. A references or three is normal and expected.
When somebody publishes a bullshit paper that is eventually withdrawn, every subsequent paper citing the fraudulent work can also be withdrawn as being unreliable.
A sign it’s all bullshit is when you see the majority of the citations for the paper from the same author. This usually doesn’t pass peer review anymore. In hyperspecialized fields with few researchers, they commonly get a little creative on the introduction section to include other authors.
flandish@lemmy.world 6 hours ago
makes sense! thanks for the reply.
U7826391786239@piefed.zip 7 hours ago
he’s ripe for a great career with openai
sepi@piefed.social 3 hours ago
Grok
Silic0n_Alph4@lemmy.world 34 minutes ago
I wonder how retracting a man’s papers compares to rejecting him from art school?