Open Menu
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
lotide
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
Login

TikTok's 'Addictive Design' Found to Be Illegal in Europe

⁨552⁩ ⁨likes⁩

Submitted ⁨⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨Beep@lemmus.org⁩ to ⁨technology@lemmy.world⁩

https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/news/commission-preliminarily-finds-tiktoks-addictive-design-breach-digital-services-act

source

Comments

Sort:hotnewtop
  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨hour⁩ ago

    Bravo EU!!!

    source
  • Formfiller@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨hour⁩ ago

    Anything owned by that pos Zionist Larry Ellison should be illegal

    source
  • umbrella@lemmy.ml ⁨5⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    great, do facebook products now.

    source
    • b_tr3e@feddit.org ⁨4⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Meta got sued and had to pay €1,500 per user in a ruling of a supreme state court which can’t be appealed. There’s a wave of lawsuits expected to follow because this actually means every Facebook user (for now, it might be possible that non-users whose data were also collected will sue, too) can easily sue now. I remember Meta boasting to have the data of some 10M Germans for targeted advertising. Unfortunately that’s hardly robust evidence but I hope they’ll sue them to hell and back.

      source
      • umbrella@lemmy.ml ⁨4⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        i keep hearing about these companies getting fined, yet here we still are.

        source
  • db2@lemmy.world ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Let me hold my breath waiting for something actually meaningful to be done about it, more than a “cost of doing business” protection payment.

    source
    • daw@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨hour⁩ ago

      6% of worldwide revenue

      source
      • db2@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨hour⁩ ago

        For ten years, and they can’t restructure it away.

        source
  • paraphrand@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Tech companies shouldn’t have these sorts of algorithmic profiles of people. It’s manipulation.

    source
  • mrdown@lemmy.world ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Lemmy has infinite scrolling too so if lemmy get big it will have the same legal issue

    source
    • Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      This includes features such as infinite scroll, autoplay, push notifications, and its highly personalised recommender system.

      I don’t think Lemmy (or any text based platform) really fits the bill

      source
      • SendMePhotos@lemmy.world ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        Wait your app isn’t like this?

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • ToTheGraveMyLove@sh.itjust.works ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        Lemmy has a ton of media tho, its not entirely text based.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • mrdown@lemmy.world ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        I don’t think the EU would ignore it if it was only infinite scroll

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      There’s a big difference between infinite scrolling content that’s using algorithms to specifically keep you scrolling and how Lemmy does it. On Lemmy that’s a you problem not a capitalism problem.

      source
      • mrdown@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        It is subjective. I personally spend more time on non algorithmic feed than algorithm one. It is boring to keep seeing the same time of content most of the time

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • Oaksey@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Not always infinite. If you set it to be the top posts for the last 12 hours for example, it isn’t that hard to get to the end, not like automatically chosen posts follow on or are inserted into that feed.

      source
    • just_an_average_joe@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Not really, i have hit the limit 2 3 times. Maybe its a voyager feature but it definitely has a limit

      source
    • paraphrand@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Nonsense.

      source
      • 5gruel@lemmy.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        Well crafted counter argument

        source
    • morto@piefed.social ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Just some guis/apps, and it’s mostly optional

      source
  • ZephyrXero@lemmy.world ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    And what about all their copycats? Like Instagram and YouTube that are trying to do the same thing?

    source
    • ageedizzle@piefed.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨hour⁩ ago

      Loops too. It’s the fediverse version of TikTok. Would it also be illegal? 

      source
    • morto@piefed.social ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      If this case gets a closure against tiktok, it will become a jurisprudence and will allow to do the same to them

      source
  • MrKoyun@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Cool! No one’s surprised. Anyway. Nothing is gonna be done.

    source
  • FauxLiving@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    The big danger here, which these steps mitigate but do not solve are:

    #1 Algorithmically curated content

    There are systems of automated content moderation that are in place that remove or suppress content. Ostensibly for protecting users from viewing illegal or disturbing content. There are systems for recommending content to a user by using metrics for the content, metrics for the users combined with machine learning algorithm and other controls which create a system of controls to both restrict and promote content based on criteria set by the owner. We commonly call this, abstractly, ‘The Algorithm’ Meta has theirs, X has theirs, TikTok has theirs. Originally these were used to recommend ads and products but now they’ve discovered that selling political opinions for cash is a far more lucrative business. This change from advertiser to for-hire propagandist

    The personal metrics that these systems use are made up of every bit of information that the company can extract out of you via your smartphone, linked identity, ad network data and other data brokers. The amount of data that is available on the average consumer is pretty comprehensive right down to knowing the user’s rough/exact location in real-time.

    The Algorithm used by social media companies are a black box, so we don’t know how they are designed. Nor do we know how they are being used at any given moment. There are things that they are required to do (like block illegal content) but there are very little, if any, restrictions on what they can block or promote otherwise nor are there any reporting requirements for changes to these systems or restrictions on selling the use of The Algorithm for any reason whatsoever.

    There have been many public examples of the owners of that box to restricting speech by de-prioritizing videos or restricting content containing specific terms in a way that imposes a specific viewpoint through manufactured consensus. We have no idea if this was done by accident (as claimed by the companies, when they operate too brazenly and are discovered), if it was done because the owner had a specific viewpoint or if the owner was paid to impose that viewpoint.

    This means that our entire online public discourse is controllable. That means of control is essentially unregulated and is increasingly being used and sold for, what cannot be called anything but, propaganda.

    #2 - There is no #2, the Algorithms are dangerous cyberweapons, their usage should be heavily regulated and incredible restrictions put on their use against people.

    source
  • atropa@piefed.social ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Nobody uses tiktok here , except apes in the zoo

    source
    • breakingcups@lemmy.world ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      8 don’t know where you live, but over here (European country) I can easily see 5 people on TikTok when I’m on the train.

      source
      • atropa@piefed.social ⁨11⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        About the same as your country, the UK, 38%. This is a skewed picture based on age. Popular with teenagers and single people, ages 24 to 36, to break the loneliness. I don’t know anyone in my environment who uses this, the same goes for my daughter

        source
  • ModernRisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨11⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Illegal, certainly. Are they going to do something about it, definitely not.

    source