They can’t do math at The Economist.
How are people still on the fence about this guy?
Submitted 3 days ago by TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com to [deleted]
https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/pictrs/image/14887d25-22dd-4733-87ab-980dc38992fa.webp
They can’t do math at The Economist.
How are people still on the fence about this guy?
A significant minority of Germans liked Hitler even after 1945. Plenty of people will just never stop supporting Trump.
OK, but how are people “on the fence” as in undecided about him. He’s not someone that people tend to feel ambivalent about
Sorry to be the one to break it to you, but the US is filled with shitty people.
Too deep in, have to stick with it now. Too ashamed to openly admit they were both too dumb and ignorant to believe his lies, so they just continue doing it while pointing fingers at others. When you blame others for everything bad you did or are, all they can only reply with “no you!” which is a weak response. It’s hiding by pointing fingers at others. Shame others to hide your shame.
Crushed by work ?
Too deep into the cult but to actually see him negatively, while seeing their whole life in shambles due to his administration.
Motherfucker, do we really need to bring back the corn?
Don’t be so corny
we posted corn about this you ass
41% stupid
4% brain damaged
The economist has long since lost any claims to integrity. Thry ask all the right questions, and make up all the wrong answers.
Someone should call up Weird Al to turn this into a remix of Remember the Name by Fort Minor, lol
I’m just looking forward to him being “Kirked”
Hopefully really soon. I think it’d be a lovely way to enjoy the new year
All those Americans willing to sacrifice countless lives, including children, all to keep the second amendment to be able to rise up against their government if needed… Well, how about now? This is your time to show your bullshit argument was something you meant.
Yanks are really good at hating
It doesn’t really matter who, they’ll jump right in and hate
There’s a reason why their TV shows and movies are so superficial, along with everything else they do
They crave distraction from the misery that they live with.
For too many, the escape is from a misery that is inflicted upon them.
For plenty, the misery is because they live shallow lives where the only way they can find value is to compare themselves to others and hope that they have more material wealth
It’s fucked, but hate keeps the wheels turning in 'Murica
NO! I want him to die ranting and raving with dementia. I want all of America to see what they voted for. If he’s assassinated he becomes a martyr and we’ll never be rid of MAGA.
zloubida@sh.itjust.works 3 days ago
It’s called rounding, and it’s quite common.
starik@lemmy.zip 3 days ago
40.5 + 56.5 + 3.5 = 100.5
Something’s not right.
zloubida@sh.itjust.works 3 days ago
Unless 40.5, 56.5 and 3.5 are themselves additions of rounded numbers. It’s generally how that works.
KraeuterRoy@feddit.org 2 days ago
The bigliest and bestest President the world has ever seen obviously surpasses the wokist 100% barrier! First to ever do that!
starik@lemmy.zip 2 days ago
Using strongly/somewhat for approve and disapprove:
39.5 + 0.5 + 55.5 + 0.5 + 3.5 = 99.5
That could work.
vivalapivo@lemmy.today 3 days ago
It can’t happen with honest rounding
dracc@discuss.tchncs.de 3 days ago
What rounding algorithm was used? I have a hard time coming up with values or methods to be more than a single unit off.
TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 days ago
A wrong one clearly haha
zloubida@sh.itjust.works 3 days ago
Approve and disapprove are generally a collection of different possible response generally (for example strongly approve, approve, slightly approve) which all can be rounded. When you round the result of an addition of rounded numbers, the result can be slightly off, without changing the significance of the result.