zloubida

I think here “conservative” is not used in the “traditionalist” sense, but in the “cautious” one. Willich was against the gradual approach of Marx, and was for more revolutionary acts here and now.

Punjabi speakers will find Esperanto easier than any natural language. It will be harder for them than for, say, a French speaker, but in the absolute it will be easy for both.

Esperanto’s not perfect, for sure. The existence of /x/ is indeed one of its flaws, but it almost disappeared in modern Esperanto because of that.

For the rest, a language do need some diversity in its phonology or the words would have to be very long and least recognizable. It won’t be a problem if you mispronounce most phonemes a little, as there’s no correct accent; if you pronounce ankaŭ [ankau] instead of [ankau̯] nobody will care… Again it’s not perfect, but perfection doesn’t exist and Esperanto works.

If you’re Polish

There are 28 phonemes in Esperanto. 44 in English. 51 in Polish (probably less, in fact, I don’t speak Polish maybe someone who does could correct me?).

Haven’t seen any vocabulary from Mandarin in Esperanto.

All ≠ most.

No the grammar will be easily understood to anyone having a language with an accusative morphosyntactic alignment, that is, by far the most widespread one. The phonetic inventory is quite limited, so perfectly learnable for every culture. For the vocabulary I agree, but it’s linked to the most spoken languages of the world, so, not that bad.

Indo-European. That is, 3.4 billion native speakers. And only for the vocabulary and writing system: the grammar is pretty universal.

Ask the Rohingya.

Mix the two. Butter become slightly toxic when cooked, but if you add olive oil it stops this reaction. And it’s delicious.

I’m not a very experienced user, but I’m happy with it. I have mainly a static blog, an almost unused Nextcloud, a Matrix server (down since yesterday, I don’t know why) and my calendar. It works quite well!

Same here with Freedombox.

Image

Image