I just had that comment the other day from a recruiter who “dug into” my socials with the help of “expert tools”. She said “Aww… you seem really nice to everyone!” (eller “Faaaan… du framstår som så trevlig mot allt och alla!”) after browsing all my non-anonymous social posts and seeing which Facebook groups I’ve participated in. I had just about deleted my Meta accounts before I realized I needed to have some kind of semblance of “social posting”, as my LinkedIn and such were pretty meager. The recruiting company unfortunately seems to prove that I need to have a social media trail in order to be employable in my field of expertise. Which has literally nothing to do with social media.
When a person follows you and watches your every move, it's called stalking. When companies like Meta do it, it's just called collecting user data.
Submitted 3 weeks ago by MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world to showerthoughts@lemmy.world
Comments
Regna@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
entwine413@lemm.ee 3 weeks ago
Maybe that’s why I can’t even get to the first round of interviews despite a decade of experience in the field.
TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 3 weeks ago
Fortunately for you, LLMs are obnoxiously friendly, so why not generate a few slops of happiness for Meta every now and then. As a bonus, you’ll be polluting their next model too. It’s a win-win situation!
A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 3 weeks ago
I still call it stalking.
MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
That’s just a product of you trying to be objective and accurate.
Prime_Minister_Keyes@lemm.ee 3 weeks ago
hddsx@lemmy.ca 3 weeks ago
I have nothing to hide, except my alternative media sources. I also have absolutely nothing I’d like to share though.
Just because I have nothing to hide doesn’t mean I’m going to keep my front door open and let you catalogue everything I own and watch everything I do
muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 3 weeks ago
Taking one idea is plagiarism taking a thousand is inspiration. Seems the same logic applies to this
Akasazh@feddit.nl 3 weeks ago
'All data is metadata’
- Meta
Zachariah@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Well, did you provide them a EULA (that they’ll never read) first?
HubertManne@piefed.social 3 weeks ago
Oh yeah. I have seen many a comic with the comparison and apple even had an ad about it. Its crazy what people will put up with for so little and if it were the government, oh boy, but you know all good because corporations have our best interest or they are not as powerful as governments to control us or ruin our lives... /s
poppichew@piefed.social 3 weeks ago
[deleted]Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
I have seen many people say they’ll never buy a thing they’re advertised. Me too
Nobody is completely immune to manipulation, they’re only getting better at manipulation, and even if it doesn’t work on you, it works on others.
I know it sounds insane to call it this, but language hasn’t kept up with the digital age: it’s stalking, brainwashing, and stealing.
Following a target around, cataloguing their habits, and deliberately manipulating their thoughts and behaviors until they buy what you want them to buy. That’s what modern advertising is.
MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Cambridge Analytica would like a chat with you about intent.
Also see Trump regime.
thesohoriots@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
When Nathan Fielder does it, it’s art.
kautau@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
yesman@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Or you could just be the Police. (the band or the pigs, your choice)
MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Oh can’t you seeeeee
BroBot9000@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Absolutely can’t stand the “I have nothing to hide” response. Like y’all aren’t parroting Nazi propaganda.
solsangraal@lemmy.zip 3 weeks ago
“nothing to hide”
just wait until your smart fridge notifies your insurance company (who knows you’re diabetic) that you just bought a gallon of NOT sugar free ice cream. think they’ll give a rat’s ass that it’s not for you? i bet they’ll be more than happy to raise your premiums either way. or worse
HeyJoe@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
I am in the minority but if i ever had a fridge that’s costing me money like that it would never be a brand I would ever associate with ever again and the current one is being tossed ASAP. I’m also not connecting fridges to my wifi either because why should it be?
Witchfire@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
They’ll send the vegan police after you?
entwine413@lemm.ee 3 weeks ago
When someone says this irl, I like to ask them if I can go look through their underwear drawer.
Oddly enough the people with nothing to hide usually say no.
CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
Underwear drawer is nothing compared to their actual phone.
If they have nothing to hide, then you should be able to install a mirroring app so that you can log onto their phone at anytime for any reason.
I don’t get any takers on this either.
Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
This reminds me of when a neighbor reported to the landlord that we were smoking weed indoors. She claimed she could smell it in her own apartment. We weren’t (and weed is legal where I live, so it’s a moot point.) When the landlord came around, we let him come in and smell our apartment. He found nothing.
So we suggested that the landlord go smell HER (the narc’s) apartment to confirm how bad the smell is. Guess what? She refused to let him in.
If she ever attempts to complain again, the procedure now will be to investigate her apartment first. If she refuses, we won’t be bothered. So yeah.
DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 3 weeks ago
“Commander Vimes didn’t like the phrase ‘The innocent have nothing to fear’, believing the innocent had everything to fear, mostly from the guilty.”
yagurlreese@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
I’m not parroting anything. I just also realize the vast scale of the data imo makes most of it worthless outside of demographics ad targeting lol
A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 3 weeks ago
Not when each point is matched to a unique machine (i.e. user) ID. It’s not anonymous, it’s “anonymized” which is just snake oil (replace your actual name with a unique ID).
Also, I find ad targeting bad enough all by itself.