I still prefer 5D Chess With Multiverse Time Travel
GOTY
Submitted 1 month ago by hypertown@lemmy.world to [deleted]
https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/997fff8b-f2df-4b46-b890-906b358d5128.jpeg
Comments
Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
mkwt@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Category: existential horror.
moonburster@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I’ve seen this and the trailer is enough to give me migraine
Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Here comes the queen with a 200 space jump to the living room, looking for a possible flank…
EleventhHour@lemmy.world 1 month ago
mamg22@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Naviary on youtube has made just that. Their videos are amazing, mostly going over the theory created by having an infinite chessboard (“mate in omega” and it’s sequel are mind boggling), and some are about the technical aspects of implementing infinite chess. Highly recommend watching them.
skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Hell yeah, I came in here specifically to post about those videos. Infinite chess gets extremely much more buck wild than you’d initially expect.
dsilverz@thelemmy.club 1 month ago
Somehow it reminded me of The Angel Problem:
The Angel-Devil game is played on an infinite chess board. In each turn the Angel jumps from his current position to a square at distance at most k. He tries to escape his opponent, the Devil, who blocks one square in each move. It is an open question whether an Angel of some power k can escape forever.
The mechanics are obviously different from it, but the theory kinda of still applies: if we limit the pieces to the maximum of K squares, could it lead to a checkmate?
0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
That’s neat, I’d never heard of it before!
It is an open question whether an Angel of some power k can escape forever.
Looks like you’re quoting the Proceedings of 11th Annual International Conference on Computing and Combinatorics from 2005: dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.5555/2958119.2958180
Apparently, it was solved (twice!) the next year.
In late 2006, the original problem was solved when independent proofs appeared, showing that an angel can win. Bowditch proved that a 4-angel (that is, an angel with power k = 4) can win[2] and Máthé[3] and Kloster[4] gave proofs that a 2-angel can win.
ngn@lemy.lol 1 month ago
i like how they wrote “two” in parentheses next to “2”
Fillicia@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
That’s how you recognize a technical drafter. That and handwriting only in uppercase.
Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 1 month ago
From the toilet in the bathroom, you move when you’ve got a movement.
Venator@lemmy.nz 1 month ago
You’ve heard of correspondence chess, how about commode-ance chess?
absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 1 month ago
I think you miss the opportunity to use “correspond-ass chess”
bruhduh@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Looks like Slavic chess
GeorgimusPrime@lemmy.world 1 month ago
There should be Voyager 1 and 2 pieces on this board
ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 1 month ago
There are, they’re just a bit out of frame.
Moah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
It’s called go
Donjuanme@lemmy.world 1 month ago
G2 is finally viable?
Donjuanme@lemmy.world 1 month ago
And white finally has a mate in 3 moves!
Etterra@lemmy.world 1 month ago
When you can move your Knight off the board so you can make a flanking cavalry charge.
Nasan@sopuli.xyz 1 month ago
Pawns just can’t catch a break
brown567@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
I was gonna say, that’s a pretty big nerf
lugal@sopuli.xyz 1 month ago
Chess 2.0? Finally
wjrii@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Looks shitty.
Isa@feddit.org 1 month ago
ivanafterall@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Image
webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 1 month ago
Image
infinitechess.org