The recent ones haven’t been declassified yet.
Comment on YSK: The CIA proposed a 9/11 style false flag attack on US citizens to justify invading Cuba
gigachad@piefed.social 3 weeks ago
In 1962
Does not make it less outrageous, but I thought it’s good to know it’s not a recent proposal
katharta@piefed.social 2 weeks ago
Rooster326@programming.dev 2 weeks ago
Yes, they are currently behind the shitter at Mar-a-Lago
AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
There’s a lot of crazy conspiracy theorists who believe Kennedy rejecting the operation in 1962 may have had something to do with his head doing that thing it did in Dallas in 1963.
Obviously not the only factor. He had a lot of strikes against him for pushing back on the plans of men who weren’t elected to run the United States, but felt entitled to do so on account of knowing what was best for democracy.
sakuraba@lemmy.ml 2 weeks ago
i hate when heads do that thingy
MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca 2 weeks ago
That’s my favourite conspiracy theory, JFK’s head just did that on its own.
brownsugga@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
There was also talk, I believe, of ending some of the oil and gas subsidies, which is where the Bush connection comes in
acockworkorange@mander.xyz 3 weeks ago
The invading Cuba part kinda already tells us that.
MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 3 weeks ago
It really doesn’t, if you’ve heard the orange talk recently.
acockworkorange@mander.xyz 3 weeks ago
I so my best not to. Fuck this timeline.
MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 3 weeks ago
Amen to that.
DokPsy@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Considering going after Cuba has been floated as recently as last week, it doesn’t
SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 2 weeks ago
I bet there is a proposal, we just haven’t learned about it yet.
discocactus@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Which of course means there have been no recent proposals 🙄
Professorozone@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Well 9/11 was 2001? Just throwing that out there.
Manjushri@piefed.social 3 weeks ago
In the modern era, the US president doesn’t need to actually have a justification for starting a war, just the possibility of profit.
BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 weeks ago
It’s not a war, it’s an engagement of political discourse through military action to accommodate business interests.
WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Agressive negotiations?
spankinspinach@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
Unilateral discourse, of course!
sakuraba@lemmy.ml 2 weeks ago
that linkedin translator from kagi is working pretty well
jaybone@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
Because they control all the media. So their talking heads just make up some obvious lies, and they are spouted and propagated without being challenged by actual journalism.