The recent ones haven’t been declassified yet.
Comment on YSK: The CIA proposed a 9/11 style false flag attack on US citizens to justify invading Cuba
gigachad@piefed.social 1 month ago
In 1962
Does not make it less outrageous, but I thought it’s good to know it’s not a recent proposal
katharta@piefed.social 1 month ago
Rooster326@programming.dev 1 month ago
Yes, they are currently behind the shitter at Mar-a-Lago
AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
There’s a lot of crazy conspiracy theorists who believe Kennedy rejecting the operation in 1962 may have had something to do with his head doing that thing it did in Dallas in 1963.
Obviously not the only factor. He had a lot of strikes against him for pushing back on the plans of men who weren’t elected to run the United States, but felt entitled to do so on account of knowing what was best for democracy.
sakuraba@lemmy.ml 1 month ago
i hate when heads do that thingy
MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
That’s my favourite conspiracy theory, JFK’s head just did that on its own.
brownsugga@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
There was also talk, I believe, of ending some of the oil and gas subsidies, which is where the Bush connection comes in
acockworkorange@mander.xyz 1 month ago
The invading Cuba part kinda already tells us that.
MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 1 month ago
It really doesn’t, if you’ve heard the orange talk recently.
acockworkorange@mander.xyz 1 month ago
I so my best not to. Fuck this timeline.
MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 1 month ago
Amen to that.
DokPsy@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Considering going after Cuba has been floated as recently as last week, it doesn’t
SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 1 month ago
I bet there is a proposal, we just haven’t learned about it yet.
discocactus@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Which of course means there have been no recent proposals 🙄
Professorozone@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Well 9/11 was 2001? Just throwing that out there.
Manjushri@piefed.social 1 month ago
In the modern era, the US president doesn’t need to actually have a justification for starting a war, just the possibility of profit.
BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
It’s not a war, it’s an engagement of political discourse through military action to accommodate business interests.
WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Agressive negotiations?
spankinspinach@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Unilateral discourse, of course!
sakuraba@lemmy.ml 1 month ago
that linkedin translator from kagi is working pretty well
jaybone@lemmy.zip 1 month ago
Because they control all the media. So their talking heads just make up some obvious lies, and they are spouted and propagated without being challenged by actual journalism.