BeardededSquidward
@BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone
- Comment on But bro please 2 days ago:
I cannot contain nor rid my hate for Nazis.
- Comment on But bro please 3 days ago:
Aren’t you so charming.
- Comment on What is the best alternative to a "smart" cell phone today? 3 days ago:
I know I’m interested in either a dumb flip phone or a smart phone that’ll last a while that doesn’t rely on Android or iOS.
- Comment on But bro please 4 days ago:
And the general blood lust of non-USA people telling us to start killing one another in the streets. Wonderful people.
- Comment on But bro please 4 days ago:
Principle amount of “well go do it” people seem to infer lone gunman to me. Just generally comments from anti-gun people and those outside the USA.
- Comment on But bro please 4 days ago:
Because apparently people don’t learn the laws like they should before they spout off. Like it’s illegal to own or purchase a firearm if you’re a convicted domestic abuser. Now enforcement, we can talk how lax that might be.
- Comment on But bro please 4 days ago:
Agreed, I want to see a quarter of the people in demonstrations armed. Not fighting, just armed, expressing their constitutional rights. I want them to also patrol and secure neighborhoods, be armed when in public. I want ICE to really consider next time they’re going to execute someone instead of just walking up to them on the ground and putting a round in their head.
- Comment on But bro please 4 days ago:
The merits of gun ownership and proliferation can be discussed once we get rid of the oligarchs and their fascist ideals.
- Comment on But bro please 4 days ago:
It’s problematic to say you’re arming up to actively hurt someone, even on Lemmy I believe they have rules against it. So you can only say I want to defend myself or try to imply through a wink or nudge.
What I’m tired of though is people thinking it’s all going to be lone gunmen or large formations of people fighting. This is a resistance movement, we should be thinking like the French did when the Nazis came.
- Comment on But bro please 4 days ago:
I’m reminded in this time that one of the reasons that Japan dare trying to invade the USA was “A gun behind every blade of grass.” Helicopters, planes, drones can’t hold positions. You need troops on the ground to hold a position to keep people in line. It’s hard to to do that when you can be shot from any direction.
As well to me, if I’m facing the possibility of being killed execution style for just demonstrating or helping someone that was maced, I’d rather be armed. Even if I have little chance of surviving, that’s better than 0.
- Comment on But bro please 4 days ago:
Your answer is to just die on your fucking knees. I guess that’s a way to go out.
- Comment on But bro please 4 days ago:
Not a stand up fight, there should be enough in a crowd that if they don’t feel safe trying to execute another person like they did Alex.
- Comment on But bro please 4 days ago:
“Please guys, I know they’re killing us now, but if you arm up, they will still kill you. Take the high road, know that you did in your final moments as they’re beating you to death then execute you like Alex was.”
- Comment on But bro please 4 days ago:
I thank Reagan and the Democrats for that. That act was unanimously passed just because white people were scared of black people protecting themselves from the racist cops.
- Comment on But bro please 4 days ago:
Even with hearing protection protracted use of firearms still causes hearing damage. A suppressed firearm is going to cause less damage over time than an unsuppressed. Is it perfect? Nope, but it is better than nothing.
I recently watched a video on the differences of a suppressed and unsuppressed weapon in the field. You can tell a difference certainly, and again, it’s enough to reduce harm to your hearing.
- Comment on But bro please 4 days ago:
Martin Luther King Jr. was only successful because he was the carrot, The Black Panthers were the stick. But tell me again how being armed is a bad idea entirely when it’s shown in history disarmed populations are just easier pickings.
- Comment on But bro please 4 days ago:
Funny thing is, if an armed populace is utterly incapable of doing a single damn thing as the gun banners say they are, WHY do the authoritarians in charge of these powerful modern military still banning guns?
- Comment on We really need to bring back the 70s conversation pits 4 days ago:
Wait a fucking moment here…
- Comment on 'What a great way to kill your community': Discord users are furious about its new age verification checks — and are now hunting for alternatives 4 days ago:
We were just being polite and giving some of them the benefit of the doubt. Now, if you’re conservative you’re a fucking Nazi no mincing of words. Especially the neo-liberals who talk “oh this is awful someone should do something” then vote for his nominees.
- Comment on Discord will require a face scan or ID for full access next month 5 days ago:
I’ve heard the two main ones people are looking at are Stoat (formerly Revolt) and Matrix. Honestly, I don’t mind having multiple chat clients, we did back in the 90/00s.
- Comment on Discord will require a face scan or ID for full access next month 5 days ago:
So the general consensus amongst my various friend groups and servers I’m in is that fuck this, time to abandon ship. Was wondering what the straw would be for this service.
- Comment on Homeland Security Spying on Reddit Users 6 days ago:
Yup, Reddit has gone full mask off in the past year now. Spez is a known nazi simp.
- Comment on Homeland Security Spying on Reddit Users 6 days ago:
I’d argue it was pretty shit for a long while. The fact that r/conservative with the vile spew they have is still allowed is all you need to understand.
- Comment on Consumer hardware is no longer a priority for manufacturers 6 days ago:
I thought I needed to upgrade my core components but since I’m no longer detailed graphics chasing like I was it’s not as important. It’s still fairly old at this point but it’s doing me just fine.
- Comment on Is it theoretically possible Trump and ICE are killing a very large number of immigrants (like 25% of those detained) and no one knows? 1 week ago:
Any amount of killing/deaths because of ICE/DHS is still monstrous. Just that until the word comes out that they’re killing them actively in large groups will some people “in the middle” be convinced.
- Comment on Is it theoretically possible Trump and ICE are killing a very large number of immigrants (like 25% of those detained) and no one knows? 1 week ago:
Thank you, good reads. Between the lines then is mass extermination happening? Not yet, but people are dying and disappearing, being relocated to obfuscate the line of paper work. GIven it’s Y’all Qaeda in charge of iCE we’re at the tip of mass exterminations and slavery.
- Comment on Is it theoretically possible Trump and ICE are killing a very large number of immigrants (like 25% of those detained) and no one knows? 1 week ago:
Not doubting, and wouldn’t be surprised. But I do like a good read to, have any?
- Comment on Homeland Security is trying to force tech companies to hand over data about Trump critics 1 week ago:
Say the line, Bart! “I didn’t vote for this.”
- Comment on Is it theoretically possible Trump and ICE are killing a very large number of immigrants (like 25% of those detained) and no one knows? 1 week ago:
We’re at the early stage of them trying plan A which is mass deportation to hostile countries until they realize how expensive it is. Then they’ll move on from there. So is mass killing happening? Not likely. Is genocide in place though? Absolutely.
- Comment on How accurate is this? 1 week ago:
Fast food service: Covered in grease AND dealing with customer’s bullshit.