Bro couldn’t even bring himself to mention protein folding because that’s too socialist I guess.
Did you just say use the words “useful” and “bitcoin” in the same sentence? o_O
kameecoding@lemmy.world 1 day ago
andallthat@lemmy.world 1 day ago
LLMs can’t do protein folding. A specifically-trained Machine Learning model called AlphaFold did. Here’s the paper.
Developing, training and fine tuning that model was a research effort led by two guys who got a Nobel for it. Alphafold can’t do conversation or give you hummus recipes, it knows shit about the structure of human language but can identify pattern in the domain where it has been specifically and painstakingly trained.
It wasn’t “hey chatGPT, show me how to fold a protein” is all I’m saying and the “superhuman reasoning capabilities” of current LLMs are still falling ridiculously short of even sinpler problems.
mobotsar@sh.itjust.works 5 hours ago
Crawlers aren’t LLMs; they can do arbitrary computations (whatever the target demands to access resources).
patatahooligan@lemmy.world 17 hours ago
The crawlers for LLM are not themselves LLMs.
kameecoding@lemmy.world 20 hours ago
They can’t bitcoin mine either, so technical feasibility wasn’t the goal of my reply
NeilBru@lemmy.world 21 hours ago
Hey dipshits:
The number of mouth-breathers who think every fucking “AI” is a fucking LLM is too damn high.
- Every artificial intelligence is not a deep neural network algorithm.
- Every deep neural network algorithm is not a generative adversarial network.
- Every generative adversarial network is not a language model.
- Every language model is not a large language model.
Fucking fart-sniffing twats.
$ . /end-rant.sh
londos@lemmy.world 1 day ago
You’re 100% right. I just grasped at the first example I could think of where the crawlers could do free work. Yours is Mich better. Left is best.
londos@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I went back and added “malicious” because I knew it wasn’t useful in reality. I just wanted to express the AI crawlers doing free work. But you’re right, bitcoin sucks.
raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 1 day ago
To be fair: it’s a great tool for scamming people (think ransomware) :/
DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Great for money laundering.
echodot@feddit.uk 21 hours ago
Is it? Don’t you risk losing a rather large percentage of the value.
Just by cars or something as they are much better at keeping their value. Also if somebody asks where did you get all this money from you can just point to the car and say, I sold that.
polle@feddit.org 1 day ago
The saddest part is, we thought crypto was the biggest waste of energy ever and then the LLMs entered the chat.
1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 1 day ago
At least LLMs produce something, even if it’s slop, all crypto does is… What does crypto even do again?
Honytawk@feddit.nl 20 hours ago
It gives people with already too much money a way to invest by gambling without actually helping society.
baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de [bot] 14 hours ago
for the biggest crypto investors it isn’t even really gambling. they use celebrities to hype a memecoin and then rug pull and split the profits harvested from the celebrity’s fans.
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 hours ago
Monero allows you to make untraceable transactions. That can be useful.
1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 11 hours ago
Sure, Monero is good for privacy-focused applications, but it’s a fraction of the market and the larger coins aren’t particularly any less tracable than virtual temporary payment cards, so Monero (and other privacy-centric coins) get overshadowed by the garbage coins.
Same with AI, where non-LLM models are having a huge impact in medicine, chemistry, space exploration and more, but because tech bros are shouting about the objectively less useful ones, it brings down the reputation of the entire industry.
xiwi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 hours ago
Crypto does drug sales and fraud!
echodot@feddit.uk 21 hours ago
It also makes it’s fans poorer, which at least is funny, especially since they never learn
SeptugenarianSenate@leminal.space 1 day ago
Blockchain m8 gg
raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 1 day ago
ouch. I never made that comparison, but that is on point.