I don’t think OpenAI should be offering ChatGPT 3.5 at all except via the API for use cases where quality doesn’t matter.
For human interaction, GPT 4 should be the minimum.
OpenAI Adds Free Instant ChatGPT Access for Everyone. Here's Why That Matters
Submitted 7 months ago by ooli@lemmy.world to technology@lemmy.world
Comments
abhibeckert@lemmy.world 7 months ago
Eheran@lemmy.world 7 months ago
4 is worse today than it was a year ago.
dustyData@lemmy.world 7 months ago
As intended. LLMs are either good or are easy to control and censor/direct what they answer. You can’t have both. Unlike a human with actual intelligence who can self censor or intelligently evade or circunvent compromising answers. LLMs can’t do that because they’re not actually intelligent. A product has to be controllable by its client, so, to control them, you have to lobotomize it.
RatBin@lemmy.world 7 months ago
Neither are that good. Both need a ton of human oversight. Preferably from a humam who knows the sorce material fed to the machine.
kromem@lemmy.world 7 months ago
Yeah, I’ve lost count of the number of articles or comments going “AI can’t do X” and then immediately testing and seeing that the current models absolutely do X no issue, and then going back and seeing the green ChatGPT icon or a comment about using the free version.
GPT-3.5 is a moron. The state of the art models have come a long way since then.
CeeBee@lemmy.world 7 months ago
The most infuriating thing for me is the constant barrage of “LLMs aren’t AI” from people.
These people have no understanding of what they’re talking about.
admiralteal@kbin.social 7 months ago
Particularly goofy because ChatGPT is hardly the only bot and you can use the free version of e.g., Claude and get those better results now, for free.
ReallyKinda@kbin.social 7 months ago
I haven’t played around with them, are the new models able to actually reason rather than just predictive text on steroids?
phoneymouse@lemmy.world 7 months ago
CNET can generate more articles for free
downpunxx@fedia.io 7 months ago
ad machine go brrrrr
SharkEatingBreakfast@sopuli.xyz 7 months ago
My friend is a technical writer and just lost her job because “chat GPT can do what you do!”
She then informed me that she knew 11 other people who got fired due to the same thing. And now those companies are realizing how badly they fucked up and are frantically trying to rehire.
guyrocket@kbin.social 7 months ago
I hope they realize they need BIG FAT raises to return.
SharkEatingBreakfast@sopuli.xyz 7 months ago
That’s exactly what she told me.
Plus a nice benefit package.
EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 7 months ago
That’s like firing an accountant because Excel can do what they do. Lol
RatBin@lemmy.world 7 months ago
My experience tells me that gpt is only good if a trained professional is behind the screen. If you fire a technician or a professional and fully replace it with GPT, it’ll be on you to see how much it backfires
echodot@feddit.uk 7 months ago
Replacing humans with AI is a bit like replacing a trained professional with a minimum wage, call center worker from a third world country. Sure it saves money and they can kind of do the job well enough so that if you squint it looks like the same thing. But the output is inevitably going to be subpar unless you retain a human expert manager.
Anyone who has ever had to deal with code from India knows this all too well.
Nommer@sh.itjust.works 7 months ago
Its like firing all your mechanics at a repair shop and letting the front office people fix the car because they already have the tools. But they don’t know how to fix a car.
db2@lemmy.world 7 months ago
I hope she says no.
Granite@kbin.social 7 months ago
That would be the dream, but people gotta eat. Hope she at least gets a raise.
vrojak@kbin.social 7 months ago
I hope she says yes, but demands twice her previous salary
downpunxx@fedia.io 7 months ago
I hope she says yes to double her salary