Since when do you get factual statements from normal chatbots?
If you were to train a chatbot on all public statements of Donald Trump, you probably won't get a single factual answer.
Submitted 11 months ago by DandomRude@lemmy.world to showerthoughts@lemmy.world
Comments
Jolteon@lemmy.zip 11 months ago
DandomRude@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Depends on the data they are trained on.
Jolteon@lemmy.zip 11 months ago
Chatbots aren’t designed to return correct answers. They’re designed to return answers that sound correct.
mp3@lemmy.ca 11 months ago
And a lot of sentences containing the words tremendous and fake news.
DandomRude@lemmy.world 11 months ago
But It would be the greatest chatbot, tremenouds, the best…
cerement@slrpnk.net 11 months ago
kubica@kbin.social 11 months ago
For once the hallucinations wouldn't stand out.
dwalin@lemmy.world 11 months ago
That’s a totally unfair and incorrect statement, believe me. If you trained a chatbot with his statements, it would be the most accurate and successful chatbot ever, probably the best in history. We’re talking about statements from a very successful President, someone who knows what he’s talking about. This chatbot would be tremendous, it would have the best words, the best facts. People would be amazed at how great it is. You’d see a chatbot that’s not only factual but also very, very smart, just like him. /s
Pantherina@feddit.de 11 months ago
Haha the best facts
Rottcodd@lemmy.world 11 months ago
I doubt you’d even get a coherent sentence. Just random strings of emotive nouns and adjectives with irrelevant verbs sprinkled in here and there.
guyrocket@kbin.social 11 months ago
Someone should do this. It reminds me of those old translators for Beeker-speak and other "dialects".
shalafi@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Duneld Truomp is zee-a feenest President zee-a US hed ifer hed! Bork Bork Bork!
BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world 11 months ago
You’d have the best answer, you’d have lots of them. In fact, no one would ever give a better answer than me. In the entire world. That’s how good my answers are. And people love them. They’re crazy about my answers.
Bytemeister@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Frankly, you can just use the auto-suggest option on your phone and end up with some trump-esqe stuff…
Nuclear, I think, I can get it to you in a few minutes and then you have a good day and the same to be honest.
Only thing it’s missing is some repetition/double back, which trump does a lot.
SgtAStrawberry@lemmy.world 11 months ago
I have asked for the price of the academy that you have prior knowledge of and I would like the opportunity to discuss with you the best possible way to change it .
I have not listened to him enough to know how good my phone did, but I did like the results.
mydude@lemmy.world 11 months ago
“We’re keeping the oil, we have the oil, the oil is secure, we left troops behind only for the oil.” they hate him mostly because, sometimes, he blurts out the inconvenient truth.
oDDmON@lemmy.world 11 months ago
But they’d all be laced with insults.
db2@sopuli.xyz 11 months ago
In other news water is wet and space is big.
qyron@sopuli.xyz 11 months ago
Please, don’t!
SirStumps@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Him particularly being a narcissistic lier I wouldn’t doubt it but I believe that most politicians bend the truth or omit it.
Zorque@kbin.social 11 months ago
I think it'd be great at identifying objects on sight.
PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Drumpf is bad upvotes to the left my fellow redditors
FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 months ago
It wouldn’t work. No LLM could come up with-
It would blow up the server even attempting it.
NoisyFlake@lemm.ee 11 months ago
Wait, this is a real speech? Jesus Christ.
FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Yes it is.
Caligvla@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 months ago
Chatgpt does an alright job:
Albbi@lemmy.ca 11 months ago
Sticks to a single line of thought too easily. You need 2-3 separate trains of thought all colliding in one sentence to sound authentic.
FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 months ago
I’m not a big ChatGPT fan, but it’s starting to win me over.
DandomRude@lemmy.world 11 months ago
“It’s going to be huge, folks, huge…These particles, they’re like the employees of the future, always on the job…So, in conclusion, nuclear power, it’s fantastic, it’s tremendous, it’s going to make America great again.” Gold!
Drusas@kbin.social 11 months ago
Too real.
jasondj@ttrpg.network 11 months ago
I disagree. An infinite number of AIs, given an infinite amount of time, would almost surely generate all text, including the complete word salads of Donald Trump.
Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 11 months ago
It was the best of times, it was the blurst of times.
CarlsIII@kbin.social 11 months ago
So, the nukes were prisoners or something?
FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Don’t expect me to parse Donald Trump’s ramblings for you. That’s beyond my abilities.
MxM111@kbin.social 11 months ago
What if we significantly reduce number of neurons and add lots of randomness?
Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 11 months ago
Would be really curious to find out what’s the minimum number of neurons required to generate authentic Trump speak.
statist43@feddit.de 11 months ago
Tell me this is chat gpt!
Please