Terrible article, the author stokes a completely basesless moral panic.
Porn has been the go-to scapegoat for every societal ill since time immemorial, and this is just the latest iteration of the constant fretting about it.
And the article he quotes is even more ridiculous. Now fantasy girlfriends are an existential threat to women? If a man wrote about how he has to compete with romance novels and sex toys he would be derided as a fragile loser.
I am bored with this type of discourse.
yokonzo@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I could see it, aren’t women the biggest consumers of literary porn? Someone correct me if I’m wrong but every girl I know loves her smut and will fight you about it
bob_wiley@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Siegfried@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Exactly my point: when a woman buys a vibrator it seems like she just wants some fun. BUT when a man buys the 240 Volt FUCKMASTER Pro 5000 inflatable doll with non-explosive rubber coating, 6x adjustable speed vibrating vagina, rubbery sperm-proof ass and realistic orgasmic scream with optional built-in 7.1 sound system, he becomes PERVERT… why?
LoafyLemon@kbin.social 1 year ago
There are literal adverts on TV showing various sex toys for women to use; I am yet to see one catered towards male viewership.
(Not that I would want or need to see one lol)
LavaPlanet@lemmy.world 1 year ago
It’s just not as easy, for the female anatomy to get there with hand alone, really. So there’s not much option but to choose help from an external source. Do you really think people think it’s ok for women but not men to buy sex toys?
phx@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
I’d hazard to say that they’re probably the larger consumer of electronic sex toys as well