Chavs were made up by a middle/upperclass newspaper in 2004 to paint the working class as all animalistic thugs. They never actually existed, and like with The Loch Ness Monster, the stories of run-ins with them were always too ridiculous to be true
Again with this guy pushing a chav war. You’ve been doing this for weeks at least. You are the one claiming chavs aren’t real and that any use of the term is actually referring to all working class people when that is NOT how the term is used. I honestly feel like you must be a troll at this point for how hard you are pushing a false narrative.
HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 6 days ago
No… that culture of violence was very very real. The stories may sound ridiculous, but that’s just because of how extreme that culture was.
ILoveDurians@lemmy.cafe 6 days ago
I’m not saying that violent people don’t exist. I was saying Chavs don’t exist. Chav is a hateful synonym for a working class person and the middle and upper class people made Chavs up to paint the entire working class as violent and animalistic.
HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 6 days ago
Chav is not a term to describe a working class person - it’s a term to describe a subset of youths who are pretty much feral.
By feral I mean aggressive and “antisocial” in the “are you looking at me pal” kind of response to eye contact. In essence, a youth whose primary strategy is to escalate to conflict by the shortest possible route in the hopes of winning status.
What that has to do with coming from an honest working family is beyond me!
HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 6 days ago
Reply to edited chart - violence against adult was not as common. Violence against other kids however…
Also, 1995–2002 was peak chav ;)
Flax_vert@feddit.uk 6 days ago
In my experience, Chav has never been used to describe a normal working class person. In Northern Ireland, we had our own variant “Spide” or “Smick” which were generally more tame. Less burberry more tracksuits
Flax_vert@feddit.uk 6 days ago
Dirty tricks, MI6