Who is still using fuckin’ Twitter? Don’t go to the nazi bar.
Elon Musk’s X calls for delay in Australia’s child social media ban citing ‘serious concerns’ about policy’s lawfulness
Submitted 3 weeks ago by ardi60@reddthat.com to technology@lemmy.world
Comments
Flamekebab@piefed.social 3 weeks ago
Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 weeks ago
A lot of people
Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 weeks ago
Unless the speaker is a nazi
devolution@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Your platform is shit and is the main reason these draconian laws are being proposed.
dellish@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Musk trying to frame himself as a human-rights activist is so cringe. Equating access to Xitter as a human right for minors while also trying to make out that his hate machine platform is somehow well moderated is pure insanity to anyone with a brain.
sausager@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
So this means it’s the right thing to do, got it.
WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
I wouldn’t go that far. it means it hurts them too. climate change is not good either just because it will also hurt bad people.
don@lemmy.ca 3 weeks ago
Shut your mouth, small man.
Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 weeks ago
That site needs to be nuked
MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Musk = POS Nazi.
altphoto@lemmy.today 2 weeks ago
I fixed YouTube… Removed the app from the TV and phone. Now we do other things.
lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
That’s how I fixed it too! We can still watch videos on a desktop if there is something specific we want to see, but I never let the algorithm do its work. Youtube recommends this video? Nah.
Jaysyn@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Muskrat is worried about his Australian ad revenue. He’s not capable of feeling emotions for other people.
moubliezpas@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
To be fair he does have a lot of experience in the toxicity of social media. He’s an expert in the field.
It’s like if e-coli had some serious concerns about your choice of antibacterial spray. Worth noting the objection, possibly with a little smile, and buying a few more bottles.
bizzle@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Elon Musk suuuuucks
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 3 weeks ago
Am I about to see a forum of “progressives” and communist-wannabes argue for authoritarian laws and censorship because of their hatred for the elon musk? I think I am haha
Inaminate_Carbon_Rod@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Nope.
Fuck that guy.
Fuck this bullshit legislation that was rammed though.
muntedcrocodile@hilariouschaos.com 3 weeks ago
Yep. Fascism started as a left wing ideology they haven’t let that go only the name. Fascism is Italian and derived from the word Fasces (a bundle of wooden rods) a symbol of power used by the ancient Romans and many others. Here u can see Lincoln with Fasces as armrests. 1000008372
The same bundle of sticks which the word faggot is derived from so theirs a fun fact.
Mussolini coopted the socialist movement and ideology and rebranded it as fascism. He was also very friendly and allied with the national socialists (Nazis). Fascism is fundamentally a left wing ideology yet somehow people brand it as hard right perhaps cos it has such a bad reputation and the left didn’t want to be associated with it.
thetentacle@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
They got you! Authoritarians LOVE rebranding and confusing language, calling themself democratic people republic. Calling themself nation socialist depsite murdering the disabled! It makes no sense and they love doing it, because it confuses people like you!
General_Effort@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
The original left/right distinction dates back to the French Revolution. During a brief episode, supporters of the monarchy found themselves sitting on the right and opponents (republicans and anarchists) on the left.
Later, the term conservatism was applied to the ideas of Edmund Burke, who defended a kind of constitutional monarchy.
In that sense, the US founding fathers were radical left-wing revolutionaries. However, that happened a bit before the French Revolution, so the term is anachronistic.
WW1 broke the power of monarchies in much of Europe. Fascism rose in the interwar period between WW1 and WW2 as a kind of Ersatz-Monarchy. The fascist leader did not present himself as the true heir to the throne, but as a man of the people. He did not claim his position “by the grace of god”, but might invoke “providence”. As such, a stout monarchist might genuinely call fascism left-wing. They would also think the US Republicans are left-wing extremists; at least insofar as the Republicans are republican.
Since fascism is in many ways similar to the more authoritarian versions of monarchism, fascist leaders gained the support of old monarchists. There weren’t many of those around, but they still controlled key positions in government and industry. You were not a high military office, government official, or plain rich, if you had not kowtowed to the king.
Because of all the overt similarities in ideology, demographic support, and policy, fascism has always been considered a right wing ideology by any normal observer.
unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 3 weeks ago
And why would a government listen to some random drug addict?
harmbugler@piefed.social 3 weeks ago
Sadly, because he bought a megaphone. But Albo has shown a semblance of backbone when it comes to America, so there’s hope.
desmosthenes@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
same reason tich folk buy and run media and press companies