Stop children using VPNs to watch porn, ministers told

⁨112⁩ ⁨likes⁩

Submitted ⁨⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨Naich@lemmings.world⁩ to ⁨unitedkingdom@feddit.uk⁩

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cn438z3ejxyo

As sure as night follows day.

source

Comments

Sort:hotnew top

DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨hour⁩ ago
It’d not about children, and it’s not about parents.

When you phrase this as anything but being about control you’re playing their game.

source
thanksforallthefish@literature.cafe ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
Guys don’t get sucked into the misdirecting packing - this is nothing to do with keeping children safe. Better parental effort isn’t going to make this UK govt stop the initiative because it has absolutely nothing to do with child safety.

This is about authoritarian tracking of everything a UK citizen does and says online - that’s why the careful quote is about it being ok for adults to have VPN not kids.

You know how they do that ? They make it necessary to show ID to have a VPN so then they can track what the adults are doing on a VPN.

The “think of the children” pearl clutching is a sham and a scam

source
- Dojan@pawb.social ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
  It’s never ever been about the children. Every time someone uses children as a meat shield for their arguments it’s because arguing against it is hard.
  
  “We need to execute all criminals to protect the children!l”
  “That doesn’t sound like a good idea.”
  “What? You’d support a rapist pedophile over an innocent child? You support pedos??”
  
  source
- tankplanker@lemmy.world ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
  Yup, do you have a license to use that VPN bruv?
  
  I have been saying this is the long term aim of this style of legislation for years.
  
  They knew when they implemented IPA back in 2016 that VPNs would be an ongoing problem and have been chipping away at the perception of them since then.
  
  source
  - ALiteralCabbage@feddit.uk ⁨11⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
    Well, time to start sending envelopes of cash to Mullvad!
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
AlexLost@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
When is it the parents responsibility to care and look after a child? Just admit you want to look in my closet. Just admit it and we would all feel better about it because the truth would be out there.

source
Aggravationstation@feddit.uk ⁨5⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
All devices have parental controls which can be enabled. If watching porn is bad for a child’s mental health and parents are allowing their children to use a device they have neglected to enable those controls on, how can that be considered to be anything other than child neglect? Why put the onus on providers when even the most non tech savvy parent could spend a few hours learning to stop their kids from encountering it in the first place? This is all going to go very wrong very soon.

source
flamingos@feddit.uk ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

Dame Rachel told BBC Newsnight: “Of course, we need age verification on VPNs - it’s absolutely a loophole that needs closing and that’s one of my major recommendations.”

She wants ministers to explore requiring VPNs “to implement highly effective age assurances to stop underage users from accessing pornography.”

Stop trying to enforce this at the service level, for God’s sake. What are you going to do when people switch to stuff like Tor?* ‘Online safety regulation pushes kids to that dark web’ will be a fire headline in a couple of months/years.

* I remember seeing someone link to something here they described as ‘Tor for apps’ that I can’t find, does anyone have that at hand?

The report also found more children are stumbling across pornography accidentally, with some of the 16 to 21-year-olds surveyed saying they had viewed it “aged six or younger”.

I’m sorry, but this is genuinely a failure of parents. Like, I’m not normally one to trot out the ‘parents should helicopter their children’ defence against regulation of social media, but giving a bloody six year old not-monitored-enough access to the internet is on the parent.

Also, I’d take this all a lot more seriously if parent actually used the tools already available to them:

We actually already have measures to deal with this: back in 2011 the government worked with ISPs (internet service providers) to come up with a Code of Practice on implementing ‘parental controls’ for all new customers. In 2013 this was adopted by all the major players. So when you (an adult – because you have to be over 18 to do this) register for an internet connection, you are offered adult content filtering by default. You can tweak this, if you like, for example you can decide you’re happy for your family to access social media sites but not pornography. Or if you don’t anticipate any children using your connection, you can opt out of adult filters altogether. Research conducted in 2022, however, found that although 61% of parents were aware of these filters, only 27% actually used them. Again, sing it with me: lol.

Back to the BBC article.

More than half of respondents to the survey had viewed strangulation as children, prompting Dame Rachel to also ask the government to ban depictions of it.

This is an implicit admission that age verification is ineffective. If it was, then children wouldn’t see it and then we wouldn’t need to ban it.

source
- galmuth@feddit.uk ⁨4⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
  It’s insane - I don’t give unrestricted internet access (certainly no social media) to my 9 year old, let alone a 6 year old!
  
  Parent education is needed badly!
  
  source
  - HumanPenguin@feddit.uk ⁨2⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
    Yep. But these authoritarians do not think you should have a choice. Because some parents fail. They will use the claim to control all internet.
    
    It is no accident that the solution is the force data sharing with the least trusted companies when it comes to data.
    
    Just as smart folks choosing to pay VPN as more trusted then sharing data with random porn sites scares the crap out of them.
    
    It’s got little to do with protecting anyone. Def not your children.
    
    source
- Naich@lemmings.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
  The weird thing is that I’ve been ogling internet porn since the internet was invented, and I have never seen any strangulation porn ever. This sort of shit you have to hunt down. You certainly don’t “stumble across” it.
  
  source
- Denjin@feddit.uk ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
  It’s easier to police the users than it is to get social media companies to actually do the literal minimum amount of work to protect children. Plus it has the added benefit of greatly expanding the surveillance infrastructure so they can clamp down on those pesky 80 year old nuns who oppose genocide.
  
  source
- LodeMike@lemmy.today ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
  Tor is U.S. jurisdiction kinda so it can’t really be blocked or regulated.
  
  People like me have been screaming for the past year or two that all these laws do is push children and other people onto more seedy sites.
  
  source
  - unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
    How is Tor under US jurisdiction?
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
user224@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
Next up: Stop children using HTTPS to watch porn.

source
AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
Can we focus one moment on why the fuck a 6 years-old kid could watch porn?

What the hell was a 6yo kid doing with an unsupervised internet device? How about you don’t give your 6yo kid an internet device if you can’t (or don’t want to) parent them?

source
- user224@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
  Well, that’s exactly why they do.
  
  You give them an iPad and they shut up, and that’s enough of a reason for many parents who shouldn’t be ones.
  
  source
motor6044@programming.dev ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
So now they’re moving to restrict even the technology minors could use.

Since they’ll need to know the age of anyone using a VPN, that means mandatory ID checks for everyone who connects.

What a brilliant mindset these politicians have. Welcome to the age of dictatorship, censorship, and neo-fascism.

source
HexesofVexes@lemmy.world ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
Staunch conservative - wants a totalitarian state.

Nothing newsworthy there.

source
Demigodrick@lemmy.zip ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
Honestly, country is gripped by clowns.

Would not be at all surprised to find the commissioner has shares or a financial interest in Age Verification companies.

source
Mrkawfee@feddit.uk ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
Pound shop China.

source
Tundra@sh.itjust.works ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
I imagine they will start enforcing age checks on payments to VPN companies

source
- LodeMike@lemmy.today ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
  Lmao kids would just pay double to some proxy. Or use a free service.
  
  source
  - user224@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
    Hell, even Android ProtonVPN app can not only be used for free, but also without sign up:
    
    If you prefer, you can use the app without a Proton Account. Simply tap Continue as guest. Doing this allows you to access all the free features available in the app. To access our premium features, you’ll need to sign in with a paid Proton VPN account.
    
    protonvpn.com/support/best-android-vpn-app
    
    source
TheBat@lemmy.world ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
Stop children using VPNs to watch porn

Stop children using VPNs to watch porn

Stop children using VPNs to watch porn

So many ways to read this

source
- Demigodrick@lemmy.zip ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
  Giving adults free access to high quality porn in exchange for stopping children using VPNs would probably be fairly effective.
  
  source
  - TheBat@lemmy.world ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
    It would work for me. Sorry kids, no VPN for you.
    
    source
LodeMike@lemmy.today ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
Holy shit that is a nonsensical sentence

source