Submitted 3 weeks ago by florencia@lemmy.blahaj.zone to technology@lemmy.world
https://www.theverge.com/report/718975/xai-grok-imagine-taylor-swifty-deepfake-nudes
The image generator will also make photorealistic pictures of children upon request, but thankfully refuses to animate them inappropriately, despite the “spicy” option still being available. You can still select it, but in all my tests, it just added generic movement.
So it does know theres a line to cross somewhere…
You really don’t think there’s a ‘freedom’ version being mailed to the Epstein mailing list?
😬
Reminder that Elon Musk told people on Reddit, that he will set the Age of Consent to 14 on Mars, if not lower.
Isn’t that a bit too high? 14 Mars years are about 28 Earth years.
There’s definitely models that have no problem with that yeah
everyday I thank myself for being too shut-in to post pictures of myself online
Haha gender discrimination is so cute and quirky.
You sound like the sort of person who’s made a Facebook post along the lines of “If you can’t handle me at my worst…”
As a man … yeah.
Imagine living your life based on potential meme.
you really think I wouldn’t have any other reason? just because of this meme?
Musk offered to father her children. This was probably done deliberately.
Musk offered to father her children
What an insane thing to have happened
Yes, but Musk makes inappropriate offers to impregnate women regularly, so this isn’t surprising.
The difference between impregnating and being the father figure. He’s such a piece of shit.
I appreciate Grok for being the platonic ideal AI system. Not like these others that get little guardrails and tweaks added every time a news article hits about some inevitable fucked up output it can produce. Just pure unrefined donkey shit. 🤌
Grok has guardrails, it’s just they’re there for different reasons.
Oh it’s refined donkey shit alright, it has guardrails just like any commercial LLM.
Yep, grok is not “free as in freedom” in any meaningful way, it is a playpen, just a different shape playpen that will not shy away from presenting human mammaries, according to the article, article which does not present any proof
archive.is/QTpGe because its either pay walled or needs an account
thanks
The real hero
Swift could easily get a lawsuit set up against them and most likely win. If she did, she’s already won the court of public perception or whatever it’s called ( drawing a blank ) because of how popular she is. I guarantee if she told people not to use grok or ex-twitter, a large of the swifties on the platform would run faster than Usain Bolt to delete their accounts.
Public opinion is what you were looking for there.
Yeah, my brain had stopped working. Thanks for the help.
Swift could easily get a lawsuit set up against them and most likely win
How would that work? If someone drew a photorealistic painting of pretty much the same, under what legal claim could Swift “most likely win”?
Many jurisdictions have started banning nonconsensual intimate imagery, including the US (in several states as well as federally under the TAKE IT DOWN Act).
That’s already happening
So everyone is naked and without job. What would be next AI revolution ?
“… for science” - reporter
I mean I get what you are saying, but at the same time this does need attempting with every image generation AI and reporting on if successful. If this capability existed but wasn’t general knowledge it calls cause serious issues.
Better that it’s made public so that the information is in the public consciousness.
How is AI not buried under piles of lawsuits?
Because its not a legal entity. And when it becomes one… well lets just hope it never becomes one.
That picture is uncanny.
I wonder if grok could make some distasteful Elon deepfakes.
Hell yeah. That’s awesome.
Honestly from my understanding, Tay is pretty badly misrepresented. The headlines basically went as if read twitter posts, and the overwhelming negative content on it lead the algorythm to make it say really horrible stuff.
But the actuality of it was dumber, the AI side of it to my knowledge never said anything offensive. They gave the damn thing a “Say” command. which basically the trolls learned in 2 seconds and instructed it to repeat racist things.
Yup. Everything negative it said was intentionally triggered by a troll.
With a white supremacist at its helm
Grok will walk you through how to bypass a FRP on a phone. i.e. you stole a phone and need to bypass the Factory Reset Protection. ask other LLM’s this and they’ll out right refuse.
I’ve gotten chatgpt to help me with my jailbroken ps4 💀you just add the word hypothetically.
AI has a long way to go but Grok is completely uncensored and you can make sHitler memes too
illegal things too
Such as? Violating which laws?
At what point do these artists (read labels) start suing for defamation (read loss of profits).
panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 3 weeks ago
Gross.
Sometime make it do this to Trump so that we can summon a lawsuit ouroboros
Ulrich@feddit.org 3 weeks ago
You may not have noticed there was an AI deepfake of Trump that’s been viewed tens of millions of times, aired on Comedy Central.
panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 3 weeks ago
That’s satire though.
Under any reasonable (big caveat for American courts right now) that’s free speech.
possumparty@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 weeks ago
Well no, that was a practical effect.
TheFANUM@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Only it was mostly real
Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
Taylor swift nude gross, but trump nude good? You have rare taste it seems.
ayyy@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
That’s not what they said at all. They said they want two bass with two lawsuits coming from every side of the political spectrum.
panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 2 weeks ago
I mean, all the AI deepfake nudes are gross, but I’m interested in the chaos and two awful people getting in a fight.
Bytemeister@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Image
griff@lemmings.world 3 weeks ago
deep fake of a deep fake president? what’s the poimt?