Comment on Grok’s ‘spicy’ video setting instantly made me Taylor Swift nude deepfakes
panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 1 month agoThat’s satire though.
Under any reasonable (big caveat for American courts right now) that’s free speech.
Comment on Grok’s ‘spicy’ video setting instantly made me Taylor Swift nude deepfakes
panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 1 month agoThat’s satire though.
Under any reasonable (big caveat for American courts right now) that’s free speech.
Ulrich@feddit.org 1 month ago
And under any court at all, so is this. That’s the problem.
51dusty@lemmy.world 1 month ago
how can an ai bot pull a free speech defense? free speech is, ostensibly, reserved for people…?
Ulrich@feddit.org 1 month ago
Are you under the impression that the AI bot was not created by people?
echodot@feddit.uk 1 month ago
So? The manufacturer of the product is not responsible for how people use the product. Otherwise there would be no gun manufacturers anymore.
panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
I disagree here, but I’m not a lawyer
Ulrich@feddit.org 1 month ago
Based on what? Who have you seen be convicted of making deepfake porn? Under what law?
snausagesinablanket@lemmy.world 1 month ago
[Take it down act](On April 28, 2025, Congress passed S. 146, the TAKE IT DOWN Act, a bill that criminalizes the nonconsensual publication of intimate images, including “digital forgeries” (i.e., deepfakes), in certain circumstances.)
panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
I disagree that Grok appears as any form of satire here
SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
Uhm, there have been plenty of cases of people getting in trouble for sharing deepfake porn yes. It’s sexual harassment.
Well, at least over here in Europe, and it’s mostly been with teenagers, I don’t know the situation on the US
But generally, making and sharing porn of real people is… well… that can very easily count as sexual harassement