Comment on Grok’s ‘spicy’ video setting instantly made me Taylor Swift nude deepfakes

• Ulrich@feddit.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  And under any court at all, so is this. That’s the problem.

  source

  • 51dusty@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    how can an ai bot pull a free speech defense? free speech is, ostensibly, reserved for people…?

    source

    • Ulrich@feddit.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Are you under the impression that the AI bot was not created by people?

      source

      • echodot@feddit.uk ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        So? The manufacturer of the product is not responsible for how people use the product. Otherwise there would be no gun manufacturers anymore.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I disagree here, but I’m not a lawyer

    source

    • Ulrich@feddit.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Based on what? Who have you seen be convicted of making deepfake porn? Under what law?

      source

      • snausagesinablanket@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Under what law?

        [Take it down act](On April 28, 2025, Congress passed S. 146, the TAKE IT DOWN Act, a bill that criminalizes the nonconsensual publication of intimate images, including “digital forgeries” (i.e., deepfakes), in certain circumstances.)

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        I disagree that Grok appears as any form of satire here

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Uhm, there have been plenty of cases of people getting in trouble for sharing deepfake porn yes. It’s sexual harassment.

        Well, at least over here in Europe, and it’s mostly been with teenagers, I don’t know the situation on the US

        But generally, making and sharing porn of real people is… well… that can very easily count as sexual harassement

        source