I always thought ME was okay. I think it just wasn’t that much different to 98.
came across some family heirlooms today, hahaha!
Submitted 1 day ago by orionsbelt@midwest.social to retrocomputing@lemmy.sdf.org
https://midwest.social/pictrs/image/887dd7d5-58bd-4030-965c-d2db5ea78b03.jpeg
Comments
twinnie@feddit.uk 1 day ago
Psythik@lemmy.world 1 day ago
You were lucky. I never had to shut down my WinMe PC, because it would blue screen and shut itself down near the end of the day, every day. I’m glad it introduced System Restore because I had to use it often due to constant data loss.
SidewaysHighways@lemmy.world 1 day ago
i reinstalled ME sooooo many times
grue@lemmy.world 1 day ago
2000 was better, though.
BurgerBaron@piefed.social 1 day ago
Windows ME they decided to include the WinNT driver model (can't remember what it's called) alongside the legacy VXD drivers. It's actually quite similar to some of the complaints when Windows Vista did it again.
The problem was shit/rushed driver support. If you built a new PC with well supported hardware, or just got lucky, ME wasn't any less stable than 98SE in my opinion.
Of course the nuance is lost to time, all anyone remembers is "ME bad."
dan@upvote.au 1 day ago
We had AOL in Australia for some reason, but my family could never use the trials because they required a credit or debit card. In the 90s and early 2000s, a lot of Aussie families had “bank cards” which worked at ATMs and in shops but not online. They used an Australian payment network (EFTPOS) rather than Visa or Mastercard.
In Australia, debit cards today are dual network - EFTPOS for local usage, and Visa or Mastercard for online and international usage.
TragicNotCute@lemmy.world 1 day ago
My friends and I used to get those AOL CDs in bulk and toss them like frisbees. We were little shits, but it was fun.
Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 1 day ago
They used to be 3.5” floppies and if you put tape over the copy protection hole you could get a ton of free disks
Nay@feddit.nl 1 day ago
Did anyone else know people who would say they’d just get a new disc to “add more hours” even though it very much did not work like that?
Kolanaki@pawb.social 1 day ago
It did if you made a brand new account every time.
Nay@feddit.nl 1 day ago
But you didn’t need a new CD each time, iirc.
user224@lemmy.sdf.org 1 day ago
Sorry if this is a stupid question, but did you still pay for the call itself, or was this fully free?
WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world 1 day ago
It depends on where you live. I lived in a rural area so the nearest local isp was far enough away that it cost. The cds and floppies that constantly came in the mail didn’t charge though. There were a bunch of those free services and ad supported isps. I had dial up for a long time and watched the business model go from portal style sandbox like AOL to literal "all internet is free if you keep this ad open. " towards the end before I left for college.
jawa22@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
You just gave me flashbacks of NetZero nightmares.
cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 1 day ago
When I used dial-up, local calls were free.
Zachariah@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Not free. Included in your monthly phone line subscription.
Psythik@lemmy.world 1 day ago
AOL used a combination of local and 1-800 numbers. The only additional fee you had to pay was the AOL subscription.
bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
I’m pretty sure you still had to pay your phone provider who may have charged $0.10/call unless AOL was using 1-800 numbers to dial to?
jqubed@lemmy.world 1 day ago
You would’ve had to pay for the call itself, but probably only if you had to make a long-distance call. I think by that time local numbers were pretty universally unlimited minutes, but long distance was 25¢/minute or more. I was too young to be buying phone service myself, then, but remember TV ads promoting 25¢ or 10¢ or something like that as a good deal. Around 2003 when I was first living on my own I used to buy prepaid calling cards to call home and those got me as low as 3¢/minute, and that was a bargain.
WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world 1 day ago
10 10 3 2 1. Bobwehadababyitsaboy. I forgot about those ads. They were super bowl ad popular in my memory.
Nay@feddit.nl 1 day ago
It was free, but iirc, you had to sign up for a monthly subscription, and the 700 hours was just your first month free.
bulwark@lemmy.world 1 day ago
So they were just giving away America Online by the 700 hour quantity? I now blame AOL for more than I had previously considered.
Stillwater@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
It started small and they kept growing in how many free hours. It didn’t stop at 700. I’m not sure where it stopped, but I’m sure it was in 4 digits.
700 hours is around a month if connected nonstop, but back then it was more likely that many people connected a few hours a day at most, so that could probably last the better part of a year. Not a bad offer from AOL’s perspective, if you rolled into a subscription lasting years.
jqubed@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I seem to remember our first disks/discs coming in with 5 free hours. That might’ve even been included with a Packard Bell we bought.
bulwark@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Yeah, I guess if they would have framed it as one month free it wouldn’t sound as good. I remember using it and completely ignoring everything but the actual Internet. Trolling on AIM back in the day was pretty fun.
InvalidName2@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
And I’m guessing enough boomers DID subscribe for years to make it worth it, if my anecdotal experience is anything close to normal.
grue@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I now blame AOL for more than I had previously considered.
Look up the phrase “eternal September.”
groucho@lemmy.sdf.org 1 day ago
For a while, if you were broke, you got as much internet as you wanted as long as you left the registration screen open and the modem connected…
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 day ago
hahaha
Kaput@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Trinitron display!? Those thing were top quality.
grue@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Those things are still top quality, for retrogamers looking for authenticity in how the pixel art in their old games gets rendered. High-quality CRTs need to be found a good home, not discarded.
dan@upvote.au 1 day ago
Working ones are getting harder to find (and thus more expensive) and are impractical for a lot of people.
At least CRT shaders have come a long way (in particular, RetroCrisis has some fantastic ones for RetroArch: github.com/RetroCrisis/Retro-Crisis-GDV-NTSC) so we can at least make retro games look more CRT-like.
stephen@lazysoci.al 1 day ago
I had one of those bad boys for years. It was the best.