Choose a number, 1-5!

Comments

• phlegmy@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Those all suck. This one is the perfect fork

  source

  • feddup@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    I like everything about that fork except that thin part before the top.

    I don’t want that touching my mouth… why am I like this?

    source
  • Scott_of_the_Arctic@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    That’s actually a pretty nice fork.

    source
  • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    God damn that fork better chill 🥵

    source
  • Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    This is the only correct answer

    source
• x4740N@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  2

  source
• hmmm@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  2

  source
• Redex68@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  2 but thicker and a bit different handle.

  source
• shatteredsword@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Handle of 5 with any other head 😭

  source
• bluegreenwookie@bookwormstory.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  I dont like any of them but if i had to pick 2. I like the prongs. But I don’t like the handles for any of them

  source
• Vreyan31@reddthat.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  3 or 2-with-5’s-handle

  source

  • feddup@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Yes! 2s handle is too big, 5s is a good size

    source
• HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Number 1, just because I have small hands.

  source
• Antaeus@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  5 for me

  source
• farsinuce@feddit.dk ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  2 is shit for spinning spaghetti around

  source
• valkyrieangela@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Forget the handles because they all suck. The flared outer tines are a sin and the shorter tines on 1 is a war crime. I would take 3. Ergonomically it’s not terrible and I can deal.

  source
• DrownedRats@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  1 or 3. I cant stand forks with curved outer tines. 2 is good but i prefer a straight handle over a curved one. My preferance leans towards 3 though as 1 looks like it would have slightly sharp stamped edges.

  source
• swagmoney@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  2 because the wider handle is much more comfortable to hold

  source
• Zaphod@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  So apparently I’m the only one that hates the long ass tines of 2 and prefers something like 1 or 4

  source
• thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  2

  source
• assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  2 or 5

  source
• Mustakrakish@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  How thick are they?

  source
• epique@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  1 and if we’re being really picky I want the top of one and the handle from 5

  source
• BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  They are all good since they are all single extruded so no food remains getting in between the metal part and the plastic/wood/other

  Though, we could argue that 1. is better that the others for the easy grip due to its in-curved handle. Or that its diametrical opposite, number 5. Is the best thanks to its filleted handle making it easier to hold in the case of the food scooped by it not being very hard.

  source

  • eldain@feddit.nl ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    But only 2 and 5 look post processed after extrusion to remove sharp edges, while the others don’t. I have cheap cutlery like this and I don’t like the feel.

    source

    • BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      That’s true

      2. has that large bolge at the end and is very thin where the gripping takes places making it feel w3ird in the hand

      So it looks like 5. wins this contest

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• LordWiggle@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  2. Most efficient, can hold the most food, doesn’t spread the food by wide sides which would get the food stuck

  source
• YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Some of y’all don’t know about the yogurt test and it shows! 4 is the only correct answer.

  source
• zeeplockd@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  source
• Gladaed@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  5, easy

  source
• Gladaed@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  5, easy

  source
• Thcdenton@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  2

  source
• Harvey656@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  2. But I’d still grab 5 just to watch the world burn.

  source
• Opisek@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  None of them are usable. If I had to take one, number 3 or maaaaybe number 1 instead if 3 doesn’t feel good. All the others are a sin.

  source
• MashedTech@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  2, but I feel like none is good enough. Or sturdy enough. I need 2, but thicker body

  source
• Roundeyegweilo@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  It’s 2 and it ain’t even close

  source

  • dirtycrow@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Wasn’t even surprised when I read this after eliminating 1, 5, 4, and 3.

    source
  • glibg@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Imagine needing a flared end to keep the utensil from slipping out of your hamfisted mitts. #1 all day

    source

    • Death_Equity@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      A flared handle helps to distribute the load.

      With as many people saying 2 as there are, maybe you should rethink your scoring system.

      source
    • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      It’s not even about that, it has the longest tines by far. The others are fine dessert forks, but I need that long tine action for an entree baby!

      source
    • Roundeyegweilo@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Yea the other guys hate sparring with me because my hands are huge. It’s my cross to bare.

      But uh… 1’s tines are too tiny, so no. That ain’t gonna work on huge chunks of meat.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • partypuzzle@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Noooo booty too big

    source
• techfox@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Handle of 5, prongs of 3.

  source