Man-child cries to the government that no-one wants to play with him.
X adds Twitch to its advertising boycott lawsuit
Submitted 22 hours ago by moe90@feddit.nl to technology@lemmy.world
Comments
aarRJaay@lemm.ee 22 hours ago
FutileRecipe@lemmy.world 22 hours ago
Doesn’t he have a rather large role in the party of small government?
AbidanYre@lemmy.world 21 hours ago
Co-head of a newly created department of efficiency.
It’s all so painfully stupid.
aarRJaay@lemm.ee 21 hours ago
Doesn’t change the fact that he’s a man-child crying that no-one wants to give him money to advertise on his sinking-ship platform.
SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 19 hours ago
Yeah. The one that say the government should not interfere with companies except when another company inconveniences him.
fluxion@lemmy.world 21 hours ago
Can I sue Elon for not advertising on my car window? Its only $1k/day
nolannice@lemmy.world 20 hours ago
Yes. Every company is colluding to not advertise on your window. Which is the definition of antitrust.
TheFogan@programming.dev 19 hours ago
Such a facepalm concept
Capitalists. We can’t regulate businesses, if a corporation is opperating unsafe, harming the environment, spreading hateful messages etc… the only check and balance we need is the free market, and the consumers voting with their wallets.
Consumers vote with their wallets, This is unspeakable… we need the government to regulate to make sure the consumers don’t organize and vote with their wallets.
Blackmist@feddit.uk 17 hours ago
The thing is Twitter costs under a billion to run.
He could pull all advertising and run it to the end of his life as a hobby.
But he can’t have that, because the line must go up and the workers must cower in fear whenever their boss stalks the building.
hylobates@jlai.lu 11 hours ago
That and one of the thing with rich people is that they hate losing money whatever happens.
So technically Melon could run Twitter at a loss for years but at one point, he will simply abandon it.
maxenmajs@lemmy.world 19 hours ago
initiative to withhold “billions of dollars in advertising revenue”
That’s how he sees it, huh? He is entitled to your money by default, and you’re the problem if you ever stop giving him money?
dinckelman@lemmy.world 22 hours ago
Can’t wait for this to be thrown out of court. No one is forced to buy anything on his neo-nazi platform
Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 18 hours ago
It should be thrown out but Elon is Trump now and Trump will make sure his platforms are protected.
hombre_fundido@lemmy.world 22 hours ago
First Amendment something something…
Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 21 hours ago
Twitch currently has a pretty effective moderation method for making sure certain topics or games don’t get featured on their platform.
For example, you can be in a bikini, that’s fine, but you can’t show feet.
You also can’t play the socom games from PS2, because of the idea of glorifying terrorists. Since if they win, the announcer says “terrorists win”.
The point I’m making is, these are abstract concepts that need human monitoring. It wouldn’t be that hard to add twitter/X conversations to that list.
So like, if you have a twitter, you can’t use your twitter on your away screens, or talk about it on stream. The same way you can’t give out an only fans link.
And twitch is owned by amazon. If they REALLY wanted to piss off musk, they could buy bluesky and make it the official microblogging service for all amazon owned services.
So if you have an amazon account, now you have a bluesky account.
And all the actors who act in yhe prime shows? They get signed into bluesky exclusive interaction contracts. Where they only interact with fans on bluesky.
As for CVS? They’re a struggling drug store chain. Amazon already owns whole foods. A grocery store. Would it really be too far out of the realm of plausibility to see them adopt CVS into their too big to fail ecosystem?
Jeffool@lemmy.world 2 hours ago
And all the actors who act in yhe prime shows? They get signed into bluesky exclusive interaction contracts. Where they only interact with fans on bluesky.
I’m honestly surprised they haven’t tried something like this via partnering with some platform. I think the unions would kill them… But I’m still surprised they haven’t tried it. Sports teams/leagues too.
TheEntity@lemmy.world 21 hours ago
You also can’t play the socom games from PS2, because of the idea of glorifying terrorists. Since if they win, the announcer says “terrorists win”.
Wouldn’t the same apply to Counter-Strike? Did they change it since the last time I played ages ago?
EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 hours ago
Amazon already has their own pharmacy, btw. They even bought a prescription delivery service a few years back, called PillPack or something. Buying CVS would give them brick and mortar stores for the pharmacy they already run online.
As much as I hate Amazon and their overreach into every sector of the economy, I’d love to see them bring the full might of their lawyers against Musk.
MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip 21 hours ago
It is unlikely that Amazon will buy Bluesky, but it is likely that Amazon will do its own fork of Bluesky.
Kolanaki@yiffit.net 21 hours ago
List of people who were mean to me and should be spankedCase No. 7:24-cv-00114-Kradiohead37@lemmynsfw.com 19 hours ago
This one makes no sense at all. No company will want to advertise there for fear of litigation.
aleq@lemmy.world 21 hours ago
Nollij@sopuli.xyz 17 hours ago
It would be interesting to see how that plays out in court. That clip shows that the CEO himself is aware of the concerns, and refuses to address them. It also implicitly acknowledges that the reasoning was because of those issues, and not a conspiracy to harm ex-Twitter.
Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 20 hours ago
Everyone must pay me!
Buffalox@lemmy.world 22 hours ago
This is insane, there should be fines for frivolous lawsuits like this.
mipadaitu@lemmy.world 22 hours ago
This is why he moved to Texas
ryper@lemmy.ca 20 hours ago
And changed the twitter ToS to require suits in a specific part of texas.
MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 21 hours ago
There are. In most states.
He’s having the suits filed specifically in one of the few states that don’t.