Is there a difference in meaning between the words *people* and *persons*?

Comments

• Sundial@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Persons is used in a more formal context like legal document. People is used in conversations. This is generally speaking of course.

  I could be wrong here but it may be that your sister is not laughing at your use of the word since it’s actually correct. it could be she’s laughing at your generalization of “those people” as that can sometimes be seen as condescending or derogatory.

  source

  • BackOnMyBS@lemmy.autism.place ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    she’s laughing at your generalization of “those people” as that can sometimes be seen as condescending or derogatory.

    Yeah, that’s what I’m realizing from the responses to this question. Thanks for pointing that out. Btw, it wasn’t my sister laughing. It was my supervisor at work that was laughing when I referred to my sister and her group as those people. Oopsies!

    source
• spankmonkey@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  For example, one time I was talking about how my sister and her family/household travel often, saying, “Those people travel a lot,” and the person repeated those people and gave a slight laugh. I’m wondering if I may be giving some sort of unintentional implied message when I use that word.

  I joke around friends who accidentally phrase things in ways that could sound like bigotry/racism if taken out of context, and it sounds like that it what the person was laughing about.

  ‘Those people’, when used while judging or looking down on somebody is a common way for bigots and racists to avoid using slurs around non-bigots/racists. Something like “The park was a lot more fun before those people showed up.” while nodding in the direction of some people with darker skin. Or saying that ‘those people’ are doing something unacceptable.

  It isn’t a people vs person thing, it is specifically the phrase ‘those people’.

  source

  • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Seconded. They are not laughing at your misuse of the word grammatically. They are laughing at the unintentional parallel to the way bigots talk about the people they target with their hate/insults. For a joke, they are twisting the meaning of your words to imply that when you say “those people” you are referring to some minority or marginalized group in a derogatory way. “Those people are loud” is an innocent statement on it’s own when referring to a group of people being disdisruptive. But “Those people are loud” when “those people” refers to an entire demographic of people is a derogatory stereotype. “What do you mean thoooose people?”

    source
  • GBU_28@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    When I say “those people” I mean people who don’t pick up their dogshit or don’t put their cart away and are fully capable lol

    source
• SatyrSack@lemmy.one ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  “People” refers to a group of humans as a unit. “Persons” also refers to a group, but puts emphasis on the individuality of the humans in the group.

  thesaurus.com/…/persons-vs-people-vs-peoples/

  source
• Glide@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  “People” is a generic term for more than one person.

  “Persons” denotes a singular distinct grouping of people. Ie, Native American persons.

  Not part of the question, but “peoples” is used for a plurality of distinct persons. Ie, “this had great impact on the various peoples of North America” would be a sentence to lead into a discussion on how an event had varying impacts on each unique cultural group in North America. This is largely only used in academics, specifically anthropology and sometimes sociology, but understand this use helps clear up the reason for the distinction between “people” and “persons”.

  source

  • Wolf314159@startrek.website ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    “People” is a generic term for more than one person.

    “Persons” denotes a singular distinct grouping of people. Ie, Native American persons.

    Are you sure about that? Cause it sounds like you’ve never spoken to a native English speaker about the terms here.

    A group of persons with a commonality are a people. The individuals are persons within a group. You can say “a group of people”, but that’s different (like a sheep vs. a flock of sheep and also a distraction here). The group is a people. People is not a generic term for multiple persons, it’s implicitly a group with some commonality. Nobody says “the American persons”, it’s “the American people”. The “various peoples of North America” would refer to a plurality of various and distinct groups of persons.

    source

    • Glide@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      I am literally an English teacher, and have spent years editing university papers for English as an additional language learners. Yes, I am sure.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• Slotos@feddit.nl ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  It’s not “people vs persons” but “those people vs they”.

  Conversationally, “those/these” distances you from the group you are talking about, which is humorously weird when it’s your family you’re talking about.

  It’s not the meaning of the words, but habitual (and often fleeting) attribution around them that tripped you up.

  PS: “People” are uncountable, “persons” are countable. That’s basically the whole difference between the two plurals. Although it’s rapidly disappearing, as “ten people” won’t raise a single eyebrow in a conversation.

  source
• LordGimp@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Persons is a set of individuals while people generally implies a group. “Those people” as a phrase carries negative connotations because of its use by racists pretending to be not quite as racist.

  You can use them interchangeably as long as you’re trying to imply the person’s you are referring to are linked or similar in some way.

  source
• Kolanaki@yiffit.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  I think it’s like the difference between “fish” and “fishes.”

  “Fish” refers to a group of the same type of fish, but if there are several groups of many types of fish, you would say “fishes.”

  source

  • r0ertel@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    This guy Englishes!

    source
• tlou3please@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  My understanding is that “persons” refers to people in discrete groups, where what separates those groups is pertinent to the topic being discussed.

  For example - ‘indigenous persons’ refers collectively to indigenous people, but acknowledges that there are separate subgroups of indigenous people within that. You could equally say “indigenous people” and it would be correct but you lose that nuance by not acknowledging that there are internal divisions within the group you are referring to.

  Not saying that’s the dictionary definition, but that’s how it’s generally used in my field.

  source
• Basilisk@mtgzone.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  You’d get even weirder looks if you said “those persons travel a lot”, while also sounding like someone who doesn’t really speak the language.

  “Those people” can be a racist or classist dog whistle, but isn’t always, and also there isn’t really an alternative. Say what you’re going to say, and don’t worry too much about it. The people who would misinterpret it to fit an agenda are probably going to do so regardless of what words you use.

  source

  • spankmonkey@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    “Those people” can be a racist or classist dog whistle, but isn’t always, and also there isn’t really an alternative.

    The vast majority of the time ‘they’ or ‘them’ works in the same sentence as ‘those people’ when refering a goup since you already need context for who you are referring to. I can’t even think of an example where they or them doesn’t fit.

    Description of a group of white people from Georgia.

    • I heard they like fried chicken.

    • I heard those people like fried chicken.

    Hell, the second one sounds racist even after making it clear I was talking about white people, and I typed the words!

    source

    • Deceptichum@quokk.au ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      This must be an American thing because adding those doesn’t suddenly make a sentence sound more racist to me or have any connotations.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• DrBob@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  It may helpful to think of this in terms of human rights; some rights apply to individuals so even though there may a group of them we’d refer to them as persons e.g. displaced persons. Some rights are held collectively and we would refer to them as a people e.g. Indigenous People of the Amazon.

  source
• bstix@feddit.dk ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Ok, now I’m not a linguist and also not English, but in my opinion there’s a difference. “People” is a broad undefined group. “Persons” is a more defined group.

  Adding “those” in front also alienates them further. So by saying “those people”, you are distancing yourself from them, despite then being your family. That is the amusing part for the person you talked to. You mildly insulted your family.

  In a similar vain, “some people say” all the stuff that you won’t to be heard saying yourself, even if it’s your own opinion.

  Or in some places (this might be more local) using “you” instead of “me” when answering personal questions. For instance if someone asks: “How does it make you feel?” and answered: “It makes you feel sad” then the person answering it is distancing themselves from their own answer by literally answering on behalf on some unknown “you” when they should be using “me”. Using “people” is sort of the same just on behalf of someone else.

  source

  • spankmonkey@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Adding “those” in front also alienates them further. So by saying “those people”, you are distancing yourself from them, despite them being your family.

    Great observation!

    source
• HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  You people, and I mean you people

  sometimes we gotta rework our phraseology

  source
• Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Unknown people can be called persons unknown…

  source
• tunetardis@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Sometimes people will say “That person’s name!” or “Those group of people!” in anger. “That Donald Trump! How dare he claim immigrants are eating pets?” to give you a current example.

  When spoken of a family member or mutual acquaintance with a chuckle, it means more like “That person has some strange quirk but what can you do? We still love him.”

  For example, you might hear “That dog! Always chasing his own tail.” So I think this is likely what you were getting from that conversation? It’s certainly not a criticism of your use of the word “people”.

  source