Who needs food and clean drinking water when you can have Internet.
A third of the world’s population lacks internet connectivity − airborne communications stations could change that
Submitted 2 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to technology@lemmy.world
Comments
Badeendje@lemmy.world 2 months ago
geogle@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Democratization of communication resources substantially helps other facets. I hate this sort of knee jerk whataboutism. Aid can and should be multifaceted.
Badeendje@lemmy.world 2 months ago
I agree, but there is a pretty substantial list of stuff to arrange before internet becomes a thing people need… Granted, internet can help with some of them. But focussing on the primary things to keep people alive and allow them to Prosper seems good form.
“Don’t you people have phones”…
rottingleaf@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Internet by itself is not democratization of anything anymore. Until a cure is found to centralism, censorship and anything real being hidden by oceans of weaponized information sewage.
PoopMonster@lemmy.world 2 months ago
They can order both on Amazon duh…
BombOmOm@lemmy.world 2 months ago
This problem seems like it was already solved using satellites.
The only real niche I see for this is during natural disasters, which could get a cell network back online in a limited capacity. But even then, it seems like it would be cheaper to just run some more diesel out to the cell towers’ backup generators.
potentiallynotfelix@lemdro.id 2 months ago
Anyone else remember Google(Alphabet)'s “Project Loon?” It was just like this but it failed.
Read more: Wikipedia Loon website
LiPoly@lemmynsfw.com 2 months ago
Yeah I was gonna say, felt like a deja vu. Didn’t The Zuck™️ try something similar?
werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 2 months ago
And food, but let’s get Internet first to ask them if they’re hungry.
echodot@feddit.uk 2 months ago
Well yeah but then they can order Uber eats. Solved world hunger right there for you.
daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 months ago
Land cables are not that expensive.
Unless your population is incredibly sparse, land fiber or adsl cables are the way to go.
I live in a region which have 25 hab/km^2 which is one of the lowest in the world. And we have a massive cable implementation that covers more than 95% of the population.
The problem is money. And if you don’t have money for cable you don’t have money for XVIII century internet carrying blimps.
foremanguy92_@lemmy.ml 2 months ago
Land are not that expensive but they are in charge of the State, things like balloons or Starlink are the charge of the user and the company, the State doesn’t get the money but doesn’t need to build infrastructures
Robaque@feddit.it 2 months ago
and the company
Surely the company would never be just as authoritarian as the state!
~ [cue anti-consumer subscription models and user policies]
muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 2 months ago
Doesnt starlink solve this?
Whelks_chance@lemmy.world 2 months ago
One man controlling access to a sizable percentage of the world’s internet access doesn’t solve much.
mle86@feddit.org 2 months ago
I think there are a lot of ways this is technologically solvable. Imho this is an economic challenge, not a technological one.
Wogi@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Many years ago my grandfather was involved in an air force test of aerial defense platforms that used balloons.
The idea was you could station these things all around the country and at the first sign of an attack you could have missiles launched from 10k feet to anywhere from anywhere.
The test encountered two problems that caused them to abandon the idea.
These balloons were incredibly easy to shoot down. Which would, presumably, rain volatile rocket fuel and munitions down on whatever was beneath them.
And if a missile launched, but failed to separate completely from it’s housing, it would carry that balloon on a wild, unpredictable trajectory, until it collided with something or it decided it had reached it’s detonation time.
potentiallynotfelix@lemdro.id 2 months ago
Ideally, however, these would not be shot down.
Wogi@lemmy.world 2 months ago
That’s just it, they’re an easy target, and communications infrastructure is one of the first things you want to control or eliminate if you’re taking hostile territory.
BelatedPeacock@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Ideally internet debates wouldn’t get THAT heated though.
Atrichum@lemmy.world 2 months ago
This has been a popsci fantasy for a quarter of a century or more. Google tried it and gave up.
Zetta@mander.xyz 2 months ago
Besides the cost of terminals, this problem has been solved by starlink and soon project kuiper.
echodot@feddit.uk 2 months ago
I guess that’s fine but you also have to teach people how to use the internet.
If people are from a culture that typically doesn’t have internet access then they’re not really going to understand what they can do with it.
TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee 2 months ago
Oh yeah, let’s build our infrastructure project based on tech that requires a large amount of helium. You know, that element that is extremely hard to store and transport. Yes, the one that’s already scarce and is required for vastly more important technologies.
I don’t see what the problem is, it’s not like helium production is a byproduct of an energy sector were trying to rapidly divest from…
Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
They should just use hydrogen… you won’t even have to worry about recovering anything if there is an accident.
TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee 2 months ago
Just what Comcast needs, a fleet of very slow cruise missiles.
Can’t wait for them to park their buoyant IED router above my house if I don’t upgrade to the game day package.
werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Great for the 4th of July celebrations!
rottingleaf@lemmy.world 2 months ago
It seems today’s pattern in general. Such projects go for something hardly achievable, don’t achieve it, give us all that feeling of passive frustration, and divert attention.
I think it’s about hijacking discourse.
There are plenty of places on the planet which could use additional electricity, water, wired connectivity, normal roads. Or, say, security from armed apes with UN membership, like Azerbaijan.
It’s just that we’ve reached the stage where further development changes the balance of power.
TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee 2 months ago
I think it’s kinda a byproduct of venture capital funding. With the Fed prioritizing low interest rates for the last decade, investors are a lot more willing to stick their money in yolo financial schemes.
Pssh, why build physical things when you can just gamble on things like virtual currency, virtual intellect, or even virtual reality… /s
Lesser Armenia has really flown off the handle lately. I don’t really know why they have UN membership, Azerbaijan is basically “what if the Saudi tried to build Singapore on the Caspian sea”.