“We believe it was used for ceremonial purposes…”
In a thousand years teachers will have a hard time explaining the origins of one of the most dangerous and ill-conceived weapons ever invented: the lightsaber
Submitted 6 months ago by DeepThought42@lemmy.world to showerthoughts@lemmy.world
Comments
OlinOfTheHillPeople@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 6 months ago
“Perhaps for some sort of fertility rite.”
possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 6 months ago
The guillotine was used for amputation. Prove me wrong.
rtxn@lemmy.world 6 months ago
“But hey, at least it’s not a bat’leth!” (entire classroom breaks out in laughter)
Empricorn@feddit.nl 6 months ago
If someone attacked me with that, I feel I could defeat them with basically any other weapon…
Boozilla@lemmy.world 6 months ago
I don’t know much about weapons, but to me, the bat’leth always looked like it was intentionally designed to harm the person wielding it. Like they put it on the wall as a booby trap.
Worx@lemmynsfw.com 6 months ago
Bat’leth saber for the real tryhards out there
Dasus@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Why?
Unlike in history, we don’t really lose information anymore. Not trivia about a massively popular fiction like that anyway.
For instance, Homer, the writer of the Iliad and Odyssey, is still well known. He lived almost 3000 years ago. He was known by the ancient Norse as well, so it’s not like it’s one of those things that was lost to history and discovered in the modern age.
But… I guess you might be trying to make a point that maybe by that point there are real light sabers and perhaps even have been for centuries. It’d make it sort of like the origins of the modern taser, which are also in sort of in scifi. Sort of. Loosely.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taser#History
Jack Cover, a NASA researcher, began developing the first Taser in 1969. By 1974, Cover had completed the device, which he named TASER, using a loose acronym of the title of the book Tom Swift and His Electric Rifle, a book written by the Stratemeyer Syndicate under the pseudonym Victor Appleton and featuring Cover’s childhood hero, Tom Swift
spittingimage@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Unlike in history, we don’t really lose information anymore.
We’ve developed an unfortunate habit of locking it behind paywalls, though.
Dasus@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Which evolves arm in arm with piracy, luckily.
I haven’t watched ads or paid for content in like 15 years. Well, most of the time. I do frequent the movies and that at least is paying for content and there’s no way to adblock in the cinema.
Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world 6 months ago
What do they mean I can’t pay in qubluds?!? What else would I pay with?
horsey@lemm.ee 6 months ago
We’ve already lost a ton of media from 30+ years ago due to lack of preservation and obsolete formats. Are there going to be VHS players in 50 years? DVD drives? Ways to play video formats that are now common? How about the impact of streaming and lack of physical media? What about in 300 years? Is such technology guaranteed to survive potential cataclysmic wars?
Dasus@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Yeah, ton of obsolete media. If there’s lack of preservation, there’s probably a reason for it.
I daresay there’s enough copies of Star Wars that they’ll found on hard drives for the unforeseeable future, and even if they weren’t, the story isn’t lost.
I’m sure all the original copies of the Odyssey have long since perished, but I still heard about Odysseus and the Trojan War growing up.
Literally the entire world is aware of Star Wars, more or less.
AA5B@lemmy.world 6 months ago
There are books
Hegar@kbin.social 6 months ago
Unlike in history, we don’t really lose information anymore
I wonder if this thought was also articulated by librarians at Alexandria.
Dasus@lemmy.world 6 months ago
They might have, and despite being more than a thousand years from the printing press, they would’ve been more or less right.
It’s a myth that the Library of Alexandria was the only collection and all sorts of information was lost. Sure, there were a lot of books that probably didn’t have many, if any, other copies. But for the most part, most of the books in that library had copies in other similar (if not [all] as grand) libraries.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Alexandria#Histo…
The Library of Alexandria was not the first library of its kind.[3][12] A long tradition of libraries existed in both Greece and in the ancient Near East.[13][3] The earliest recorded archive of written materials comes from the ancient Sumerian city-state of Uruk in around 3400 BC, when writing had only just begun to develop.[14] Scholarly curation of literary texts began in around 2500 BC.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Alexandria#Decli…
Burning by Julius Caesar
Scholars have interpreted Cassius Dio’s wording to indicate that the fire did not actually destroy the entire Library itself, but rather only a warehouse located near the docks being used by the Library to house scrolls.[88][82][8][90] Whatever devastation Caesar’s fire may have caused, the Library was evidently not completely destroyed.[88][82][8][90]
DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.ml 6 months ago
No you’re incorrect we lose information in the contextual sense. We need to keep context just as much as we need to keep the information.
Dasus@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Yeah.
We still know where the Trojan Horse is from, despite literally thousands of years of culture, stories, translations and a complete lack of printing technology. I also know what the context is for a burning bush.
With our far superior technology, literally global popularity of Star Wars and the fact that we haven’t lost stories of even much smaller scale from much earlier on, how would we ever lose the context of what a lightsaber is?
It would require pretty much the complete destruction of all media and the extinction of most people and if even one of the survivors was even slightly predisposed being a writer…
redcalcium@lemmy.institute 6 months ago
The amount of junk polluting the internet is growing exponentially. I won’t be surprised if future historians have trouble separating the truth from fiction, shit posts and LLM craps.
Aielman15@lemmy.world 6 months ago
It’s not just about losing history, but also mixing it with incorrect/wrong retellings of the story and fake news.
For example, you mentioned Homer, the writer of the Iliad and Odyssey who lived 3000 years ago. Homer’s existence is hotly debated, and even if he did exist, “he” probably didn’t write both poems. It’s far more likely that the Iliad and Odyssey were created as part of an extensive oral tradition by multiple travelling bards, who independently added, changed or removed verses; the story we know today as the Iliad is just one of many who happened to survive for a variety of reasons.
We also know very little of the broader trojan cycle (Cypria, Little Iliad, Sack of Troy, etc…) of which only fragments have survived. It would be as if, 1000 years from now, only the original SW trilogy survived, and only pieces or fragments of the other movies/TV series in the expanded universe remained - And to be fair, even this example is wrong, because it compares the Iliad/Odyssey to the “original” trilogy, but there’s no consensus about the relationship of the two Homeric epics with the broader epic cycle: as far as we know, they could have been created independently, and later edited to flow from one to the other seamlessly.
Dasus@lemmy.world 6 months ago
I never said Homer authored the stories he wrote.
It’s a collection yes, much like the national epic of my country, Finland. Those epics are still considered to be written by the person who actually… wrote them.
It doesn’t matter though whether Homer is a single person or many, real or fictional. What matters is that we’ve not lost the context of the story.
In your argument, it’s more like a 1000 years from now people would be consider George Lucas to be the creator of the Mandalorian. It wouldn’t be correct, but it wouldn’t be too far off the mark, and most importantly, nothing important to the context of “what is a light saber” would have been lost.
The point is that writing hadn’t even existed too long by the point that we managed to preserve stories to last until modern times.
Our current technology is undeniably far superior, and there are dedicated institutions and people who preserve important information, especially culture. Star Wars is undeniably a part of that.
There is pretty much no situation in which we’d lose the context of what a light saber is, except pretty much the destruction of the entire world, all media wiped out somehow (despite that meaning the destruction of literal nuclear bunkers) and the extinction of anyone who knows about Star Wars.
The scale of destruction would need to be such that humanity itself wouldn’t survive it.
It’s more than likely that Star Wars will outlive our species.
kinttach@lemm.ee 6 months ago
[deleted]Dasus@lemmy.world 6 months ago
We have no form of long term preservation of information any more.
Which keeps better, paper or a hard drive? Exposed to the elements, that is. A literal metal disc or a collection of paper fibers?
The sheer amount of copies of Star Wars in all it’s forms is mind-boggling, and again, literally global. We also have people and institutions dedicated to archiving significant things.
There are very few imaginable situations which would lead to humanity losing the concept of what a light saber is.
Like please, propose one.
This is unlike earlier cultures which stored information on physical media which continue to exist long after the culture that created it is gone.
You’re seriously suggesting cultures 3000 years ago preserved information better than we do? Seriously?
Simply untrue.
manucode@infosec.pub 6 months ago
Non-experts far in the future might consider us today naive for considering lightsabers future technology.
RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 6 months ago
It’s a flaming sword. Except retractable. Flaming swords have had a pretty long run as objects of interest. Lightsabers just make the concept retractable and make the “blade” a form of unobtainium.
I wonder if people will even remember it in 1000 years.