I really try to caution people from accepting these "it's too much to hold us accountable for" answers. If it's too much, then cut back. Simple as that. If I am a real estate mogul and my building collapses like in Miami, do you think the local/state/federal agencies involved will shrug it off when I go "Now now now, I have far too many properties. I can't possibly be expected to be in compliance all the time. A collapse and some deaths once in a while is inevitable"? Of course not, that would be ridiculous. Yet when youtube goes "we simply have too many uploads to screen it all," we do just that!
Same goes here. If you're juggling too many advertisers, why is that our problem?
ante@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Uhhh maybe they should find the time to do that then? How is “we don’t have the time” a valid excuse? Either hire more staff to do so, or sell fewer ads.
GiantRobotTRex@lemmy.sdf.org 1 year ago
Unfortunately that would disproportionately impact small local businesses far more than large corporations.
blazera@kbin.social 1 year ago
How?
captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Because you know who General Electric is and it’s easy to verify they’re actually advertising with you and that they’re a legitimate company, Jim-Bob’s Auto Repair, not so much.
ProvokedGamer@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
Spending more money on more staff for checking the validity of advertisements can affect small businesses more because they have less money.
Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 1 year ago
It’s not just time and resources, they too are being lied to. If the scam is good enough that people will fall for it, some advertisers will as well.
Right now there are no regulations, so many don’t care at all. That sucks, but the scammers are the problem here. They are the ones trying to rip you off. The ad companies might not care if you get screwed or not, but it’s unrealistic for us to expect them to know EXACTLY what every client’s intentions are. A business could run legitimately for years and then start running a scam. How long would we give the advertisers to realize that the client has started scamming people? Do they get in trouble because they ran ads for someone who would LATER start scamming people?
I’m all for discussing other ways to control advertising, but shooting the messenger isn’t it.
ante@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I haven’t and likely can’t think of a good solution to handling the scenarios you’re talking about. They are good questions that someone smarter than me should address. However, to use those scenarios to completely admonish advertising platforms for blatantly obvious scams is asinine. “Well, what if a legitimate business starts scamming people?” should have little relevancy to the question of “Should we accept this ad from a user advertising that they’re going to double your money if you give them access to your financial accounts?”
I’m not saying it’s simple or quick to solve, but there is very obvious low-hanging fruit that could be dealt with but is somehow not because these platforms aren’t held accountable whatsoever. It has to start somewhere.
Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I agree completely. I just wanted to point out some of the difficulties in doing what was posted.
jbrains@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Businesses exist to make profit, not to take care of you. Corporation will only care about your welfare to the extent that that creates profit for them or the laws require them to.
blazera@kbin.social 1 year ago
I believe thats whats being suggested
jbrains@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Yes, I know. The comment I replied to, however, was not that. It asked why the corporations’ reason is valid. It’s valid because that’s what the economic system is designed to promote.
Z3k3@lemmy.world 1 year ago
While also complaining its not fair when we protect ourselves from the business they won’t protect us from e.g. ad blockers.
Google going so far to invent “Web drm” to ensure we have no choice but allow them to serve us malicious ads that the won’t filer themselves
dQw4w9WgXcQ@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Absolutely. There is an exchange of money involved in the advertising services, so it would be natural to expect a small fee for sanity-checking the advertisement. Facebook are mostly able to check for nudity, porn or gore in the advertisement, so with some additional inspection, it should be possible to weed out a lot of scams.
sadreality@kbin.social 1 year ago
Well, it hurts the holy profit... also, you sound like a fucking communist!
AdverseAffects@lemmynsfw.com 1 year ago
Did you take the seconds to read the comment you’re replying to?
ante@lemmy.world 1 year ago
What the fuck are you talking about?