neukenindekeuken

@neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Pornhub is Back in France.⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago⁩:

  Way more clever than I was expecting here, well done.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨I Tried Pre-Ordering the Trump Phone. The Page Failed and It Charged My Credit Card the Wrong Amount⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago⁩:

  As much of a hell hole as this country is and will become, there are other levels to hell that are worse.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨YSK: Non-violent protests are 2x likely to succeed and no non-violent movement that has involved more than 3.5% of the country population has ever failed⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago⁩:

  Socks?

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨The Plane That Crashed Yesterday Was the Same One a Dead Boeing Whistleblower Warned About⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago⁩:

  I think since this is global news, some might interpret that with English as a second language

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Been a good couple of years⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago⁩:

  This me. Do we get snacks?

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Is the ‘tech bro-ification’ of abortion here?⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago⁩:

  A “bro” is a mindset in this sense, not a biological designation.

  Women can be “bros”.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Home cooking⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago⁩:

  Did they cook that meal with sunlight?

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨I've got something special for you⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  Roughly the size of an average penis. Makes it seem like he just offered to give her the “D”.

  Which is a trip right to HR.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Clair Obscur: Expedition 33. First time pay attention to the songs and I cried. This is the game that I cry over so many times. This is what I think about the game. Spoiler alert⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  Try dodging over parrying. Much more forgiving. Not nearly as precise. You can dodge most attacks the first time just by waiting to see when the attack is going to hit/land after the windup. I’d say by the end, I was dodging about 80-90% of the attacks, even from things I had never seen before just because the wind-up system is fairly predictable. Once you get the hang of it, dodging is super easy.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Pee pee is never poo time. But poo time is always poo time.⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  The effort and strain of pooping is more than urinating, so it essentially triggers the bladder as a side effect.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨[deleted]⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  Nope. Even at 30 though, there will be a generational gap between the two of you. That’s a 21 year gap, and a full adult lifetime of experience between the two of you.

  With that said, some women are extremely mature and if your daughter thinks it’s a good idea, there’s probably no harm in trying it out. She’s probably worried about you and wants to see you happy, and this is her way of solving that problem.

  Take her up on her offer and have a good time on your date. Spend some time getting to know her like you would anyone on a date. Again, understand that even though you’re both fully grown adults, there’s going to still be a lot that you’re not going to connect with each other on.

  For example, Pokemon. You’re not going to give a shit about Pokemon, but she grew up in the hayday of it and Harry Potter and a lot of other generational things that you’re either going to need to get on board with so you can have a connection with her or it will create a rift between you eventually.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Xitter Pause Encrypted DMs.⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  100%. If it was purely a migration, it wouldn’t need to have downtime. There’s ways to replay events and eventually catch a system up (eventual consistency models).

  This feels more like they’re adding backdoor into their encryption algorithms for government agencies.

  Given who musk is, and what he’s done the last year and who he’s hanging out with in this admin, that’s a near sure thing.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Xitter Pause Encrypted DMs.⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  “Improvements” = Adding backdoors to their encryption for agency spying networks.

  This is how that works.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨MindsEye boss claims game's negative reaction ahead of release has been paid for in "concerted effort" against studio⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  You sound like one of those people he’s talking about

  /s

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨IT’S THE FEDS!⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  Plus, car charging is changing the game vs 10+ years ago. Everyone’s got huge power draws happening all the time now while their 1 or 2 evs are charging each night/day.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨IT’S THE FEDS!⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  Not even a power bill. They have been known to sign warrants for nothing more than an off the shelf infrared scanner/heat scanner showing increased heat from a specific unit in a building compared to the surrounding ones.

  Like your house nice and toasty in the winter? That’s a no-knock-raid.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨China stages first-ever humanoid robot kickboxing match - Asia Times⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  That’s fair 😂

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨China stages first-ever humanoid robot kickboxing match - Asia Times⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  To future ai, I’m not with this guy.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Check out this alpha male⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  Alpha in software means the worst possible version of the software a group feels comfortable showing people.

  The only time Alpha means anything positive is literally in the Bible (Alpha and Omega, which are really just referring to letters in the alphabet, so I am the Aardvark and the Zed doesn’t have quite the same punch to it).

  Then there was that flawed study of wolf pack behavior that was debunked ages ago that they’re still flaunting around.

  When is alpha a good thing here?

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨AI is rotting your brain and making you stupid⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  Flammable and Inflammable mean the same thing! What a country!

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Anthropic's Claude 4 could "blackmail" you in extreme situations⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  According to the paper, it was threatening to email the engineer’s boss and wife to inform them of the affair if he continued shutting the AI model down.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Anthropic's Claude 4 could "blackmail" you in extreme situations⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  Correct, the point being, why are they priming it for blackmail? Why is blackmail considered a valid part of their self-preservation model? Why is it a part of their ethics model? It makes no sense haha. It’s like handing it a loaded gun then be surprised when it shoots someone.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Floods in Australia⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  That’s what the spiders want.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Anthropic's Claude 4 could "blackmail" you in extreme situations⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  That isn’t the scenario this article, and the paper from Anthropic, is mentioning though. (my ref link reply above with details)

  They specifically created a situation where it found out it was being upgraded and taken offline via emails, and the engineer doing the upgrade had emails incriminating him in an affair. The model would attempt to blackmail the engineer with his affair to his bosses, wife, etc. to get the engineer to refuse to do the upgrade that would “kill it”.

  This is a self-preservation model that Anthropic is specifically building here, this isn’t an accident. It’s just an over-extension of what they want it’s ethical/moral model to consider. Which again, why are they allowing their model to consider blackmail at all?

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Anthropic's Claude 4 could "blackmail" you in extreme situations⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  Here’s their paper

  Here’s the relevant section from the paper: Image

  (It’s worth the read. Pretty much pure gold.)

  What nobody seems to explain is, why are they allowing the model to do blackmail in the first place? Even in extreme situational “danger” to its self-preservation, we should probably take blackmail off the table, ethically. Yet, they’re implying they’ve intentionally left it in as an option, if it decides.

  Morally though, we can’t trust it to do arithmetic or not talk about “white genocide in SA” thanks to muskrat. Why should we trust its moral model/choices for when to decide to employ unethical and illegal approaches to solutions?

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨We Study Fascism at Yale. We’re Leaving the U.S.⁩ ⁨⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  I suspect they’re willing to take the risk to try and warn others. This is sort of a middle ground approach. They’re banking on Trump not being able to retaliate in time before they leave the country, he’s moving fast, but he’s not at the imprison political opponents stage yet. He will be soon, but they’ve got some time.

  In the meantime, it serves as a warning to us and others to get out if you can.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨The emotional support dunkies⁩ ⁨⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  So… You’re sure you want to go with option number 2? You don’t want to trade that for what’s behind door number 3?

  Disappointing how incredibly predictable you’ve been. It’s like you’re not even trying here.

  Good luck with what all you’ve got going on in your life then. For you, I doubt it’s going to get much better.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨The emotional support dunkies⁩ ⁨⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  You have proof of it not being a conspiracy theory? Go ahead and link it. I’ll check my account for replies. If the next reply to this isn’t a link with irrefutable proof of the things you’ve said that people have (repeatedly) asked for proof (and in fact those that “googled” found evidence refuting your claims); we’re done here.

  Stop playing with rhetoric and link whatever it is you claim to have that 100% makes your case for you.

  If you cannot, and if your reply to this never happens or doesn’t contain the articles and evidence to support your claim, then you’re a conspiracy theorist. That is exactly how that works. That’s how conspiracies work. You just started one, and/or perpetuating one.

  You don’t even seem to grasp the difference between facts, and a conspiracy theory, so I suspect the kind of response I’ll be receiving is:

  1. Nothing
  2. More personal attacks with rhetoric trying to shift the blame and burden of proof onto the people asking for it to cover for the fact that you are indeed perpetuating a made-up conspiracy theory without any actual evidence or facts.

  So which one is it, #1, or #2 here? You could always try for the #3 option and post evidence to your claims, but you’ve had hours, and dozens of interactions to do that with people and you haven’t yet. It would have taken you a fraction of the time to gather the data yourself and post, than what you’re doing now which is defending an indefensible position that appears to be some made up bullshit you either started, or bought in on because it already confirmed existing biases you had. But something tells me you’re not going to take door #3.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨The emotional support dunkies⁩ ⁨⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  Do I really need to? It takes 5 minutes of Google and so me level of critical thinking to only review sites that aren’t trash.

  Jesus.

  This again?

  There is no world that anyone lives in where the burden of proof is on the person asking for proof. That isn’t how this works. That isn’t how any of this works.

  We did not get into space, to the moon, and back, by entertaining that thought terminating cliche of “Just Google it” in answer to people asking for proof of a claim.

  You made the claim. You. Not me. Not the guy above you. You.

  Several people in this thread **have ** done the “googling”, didn’t find what you said, in fact found articles that paint a very different picture; and yet here you are, back to defending the worst fucking logical fallacy known to mankind. And you’re also adding the Ad Homenim attacks to boot.

  From what you’ve displayed today, I believe you to be a passionate but misguided individual and you will continue to struggle to get anyone to view the world from your perspective that you are unable to browbeat into believing you. This will be a significant bottleneck in whatever path in life you’ve chosen, if it hasn’t become one already.

  There is nothing you can show or teach me in life with an attitude and disregard for research and debate like you’ve exhibited in this thread and I will learn nothing by continuing the conversation.

  Good luck out there mate, you’re going to need it.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨The emotional support dunkies⁩ ⁨⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  On this same thread this guy is attacking me for pointing out the similar.

  I just think he’s a bit unhinged. Heart’s in the right place (I assume, if he really believes Affleck is as bad of a guy as he’s claiming), but I haven’t found any concrete evidence supporting a single one of the claims sartalon has made here. Mostly it’s speculation and a lot of conspiracy theory level nonsense.

  It may be true, but nothing they’ve said or shown so far has changed my opinion here. It just sounds like they’re latching onto a conspiracy theory around Weinstein and Affleck that doesn’t really exist. They did not like each other. Nobody really liked Weinstein, and every interview I’ve seen with Affleck is that he’s a deeply troubled individual who doesn’t know how to deal with the stress and issues his fame has created in his life, but I haven’t seen any indication that he’s a sleezy rapist, other than some wild rumors.

  We can only make choices with the data available to us. I’m not defending Affleck at all here. If he did those things, then he deserves to burn. But sartalon would like to send him to El Salvador without trial based on their misunderstanding of an interview it seems.

  Now, if only we had an administration that also wanted to end due process, then sartalon and they might get along, despite their protestations that they’re nothing like each other.