neukenindekeuken
@neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works
- Comment on That Orange Bastard 1 day ago:
Let’s hope.
- Comment on That Orange Bastard 2 days ago:
Cancer would, unfortunately, be too slow. Unless it was an extremely aggressive form of cancer. Most kinds people his age get take years to develop, and longer still if you’ve got amazing healthcare.
- Comment on Just a few 3 days ago:
We mustn’t answer the call!
- Comment on I might actually be a respectable member of society 5 days ago:
That’s been studied before, and IIRC, is not plausible, but is “acid lore”.
- Comment on I might actually be a respectable member of society 5 days ago:
Acid certainly changed my life for the better. I used to stress out about everything. I still stress out about things now, but I have the heads-up knowledge that all of reality is a fragile thread of consciousness where my brain is tricking itself into viewing and interpreting the world around me as a stable, solid thing, when the truth is that reality is as subjective as you want it to be.
There are no rules. You can make up and do whatever you want.
Then I stop worrying about why I got a $5 fee for some bullshit from my bank I’ll have to call them about tomorrow.
- Comment on Overwatch 2 Is Just 'Overwatch' Again And Five New Heroes Arrive Next Week 5 days ago:
Jetpack Cat was the original name of the cat though. It’s a tough corner they’ve backed themselves into there.
It was originally the model for Pharah, before they decided (Jeff Kaplan) that it should be more serious and not include actual animals in it (you have Winston, but he talks and acts like a human).
So they reworked the Jetpack Cat into Pharah and released her as the daughter of Ana.
Jetpack Cat is owned by Brigetta and is one of her emotes that she picks it up and cuddles it.
If they had named it anything else, it would have ruined the 10 years of lore they built up around it, so I understand why they did it.
The issue for me is that it’s a support character.
- Comment on Your teenager AND your husband 6 days ago:
Kids in Africa also don’t like soggy cereal?
- Comment on ...is this retro? 1 week ago:
I first heard that one over 15 years ago.
- Comment on TikTok claimed bugs blocked anti-ICE videos, Epstein mentions; experts call BS 1 week ago:
Not a chance. Not even remotely possible if they have automated testing (which they do) and qa staff verifying features (which they also do), and smoke/regression tests after deployment (which they do).
I’ve worked in this industry for 30 years, and the chance that that’s what happened, immediately after a takeover by people who really don’t want those terms searched on, and the feature was released in that state, and stayed in that state without a hotfix or patch going out and it wasn’t caught by their own testers, is practically nil.
- Comment on TikTok claimed bugs blocked anti-ICE videos, Epstein mentions; experts call BS 1 week ago:
Lol, that’s not how it fucking works.
Key words like that don’t just accidentally get filtered out with a “bug”.
- Comment on Tesla profit tanked 46% in 2025 | TechCrunch 1 week ago:
People need to get their teslas branded with a fucking swastika, Tarantino style.
- Comment on Tesla profit tanked 46% in 2025 | TechCrunch 1 week ago:
(hats how its supposed to work.
That is absolutely not how it actually is working.
- Comment on The #1 trick Furries dont want you to know! 2 weeks ago:
Depression.
- Comment on At Davos, NVIDIA, Microsoft CEOs deny AI bubble 2 weeks ago:
A sink-hole then?
Or, if I may: a stink-hole.
- Comment on dating 4 weeks ago:
What kind of cheese are women in my area attracted to?
- Comment on Such a dreamy guy 4 weeks ago:
Jouisiana?
- Comment on After RAM and SSDs, PSUs and CPU coolers are next in line for price hikes 4 weeks ago:
This has nothing to do with needing semiconductor and micro controller factories though. You can build these from any electronics fabrication company on earth pretty much, so I expect that a bunch of people will fill in the gap if the prices start going up like crazy.
- Comment on Zootopia 4 weeks ago:
A handshake agreement
- Comment on Check mate, atheists. 5 weeks ago:
You appear to be moving the goalposts. These are all concepts. God is not as real as Money or Love or America. You’re conflating several things here to try and obfuscate that the existence of God being proven isn’t a “big deal”.
If something is real, it can be proven, observed, the effects replicated. This is how every thing in the universe works. No exceptions.
Money can be proven, even the idea of it, even though it’s “conceptual”. It has real value, it’s a construct we created and it has physical objects in the real world and can be exchanged for goods and services. It’s a real idea that takes physical shape in the world and it can be proven as a real world concept.
Love is a concept, and while the nuances behind it aren’t well understood, it’s as real as anything anyone feels, like hate, fear, or any emotion. It’s an emotion, and emotions are a part of the human empathic experience. It’s something we’ve evolved and learned over time. It’s real because we make it real every day. Love isn’t existential, it doesn’t have some power we’re unable to measure. It can’t bend or warp or shift reality. It can’t do anything more than we can do as a human. In all the ways that matter, any result of love is 100% measurable and observable in the physical world.
America is a real place, a real continent, a real country, with real people, and while the idea of a country or its people changes over time, it’s not “fake” or made up, in the same way a claim about a deity is. The idea of America might be what you’re referring to, but it’s as real as any other shared idea or dream people have had in history, including Rome, the EU, etc.
You’re intentionally trying to muddy the waters and misdirect here by conflating the “realness” of God with 3 things that are nothing like the claim of God, and that can be quite easily proven with objective evidence.
Anything anyone claims that exists outside of our ability to observe, test, or measure, is either talking about things so small or far away that we haven’t developed the tools to measure and observe them yet, or they’re spouting bullshit.
Which bucket do the claims of god, and all religions fall into do you think?
- Comment on The amount of sense NYE party glasses make has rapidly declined. 5 weeks ago:
What about chaotic neutral orgies?
- Comment on Been a long time since I smoked but if I opened the door to my fireplace and tossed in a kilo of pot and just let the smoke fill up the house will everyone in my house get high? 1 month ago:
“If I deprive everyone in the house of oxygen, how high will we get?”
High AF for the rest of your life. Which is due to end in around 10-15 minutes from now.
- Comment on Visa says AI will start shopping and paying for you in 2026 1 month ago:
The fuck it will
- Comment on AI’s Unpaid Debt: How LLM Scrapers Destroy the Social Contract of Open Source 1 month ago:
There is absolutely no way you’re using an LLM to rewrite the Linux kernel in any way. That’s not what they do, and whatever it produces wouldn’t be even a fraction of effective as the current kernel.
They’re text prediction machines. That’s it. Markov generators on steroids.
I’d also be curious about where that 15-20% productivity increase comes from in aggregate. That’s an extremely misleading statistic. The truth is there are no consensus data on any productivity improvements with LLMs today in aggregate. Anything anyone has is made up. It’s also not taking into account the additional bugs and issues caused by LLMs, which are significant, and also not a thing you want to have happening on every PR with kernel code, I promise.
Regardless of all of that, the companies with these LLMs are using free software to train their models to make money without making their models free and open source or providing a way for people to use it for free/open source projects, so this is a clear violation of every single FOSS license model I’m familiar with (most commonly used is the Apache one).
TL;DR; they are stealing code meant to be free and public with any derivative works, profiting off it, and then refusing to honor the license model of the code/project they stole.
This is illegal. The only reason why we’re not seeing a lot about it is these FOSS generally have no money and are not going to sue them and potentially lose a substantial sum of their negligible funds in court. That’s it. Otherwise, what they are doing is very illegal. The sort of thing any professional software development company you work for’s legal team warns you about the second you start using an OSS project in your for profit business application codebase.
LLMs get away with it because $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$. That’s it.
- Comment on AI’s Unpaid Debt: How LLM Scrapers Destroy the Social Contract of Open Source 1 month ago:
Essentially almost all FOSS software is under an OSS license of some sort, which allows anyone to re-use their code or software as long as what re-uses it also remains free and open source or at least having at least as open/permissive of a license policy as the original work/code.
LLMs ignore that, hide it behind a subscription, and use it to train their models for selling to soulless corporate entities who will never ever allow their code to be in the FOSS world, thus, breaking the contract.
It’s not even an implicit contract, it’s explicit, and LLM companies are ignoring this and using their investment to squash any FOSS projects that want to challenge them in court on it.
- Comment on Lasagna 1 month ago:
But his shitposts live on
- Comment on Far-right Kast wins Chile election in landslide 1 month ago:
It will get so much worse before it gets better
- Comment on Oracle made a $300 billion bet on OpenAI. It's paying the price. 1 month ago:
Because they have a series of ERP systems and services that some idiot CTO at the company looks at and goes: Yes, give me one of those.
Then once you’re on that, you get pulled into more and more Oracle ecosystem shit and you think some day you’ll have control and be able to get out. But you never do.
Oracle is like the loanshark of the tech industry.
Once you’re in, you’re in for life. Good fucking luck getting out.
- Comment on Oracle made a $300 billion bet on OpenAI. It's paying the price. 1 month ago:
Fuck yeah. More of this. A lot more.
- Comment on Women would rather do drugs than go to therapy 2 months ago:
After reading about Oedipus, apparently.
- Comment on Karl Bushby: Made a bet in 1998 that he could walk from Chile to England. 27 Years later, Still walking. Survived Darién Gap, 57 days in a Russian prison, Traversing the Bering Strait on shifting ice 2 months ago:
And what are you doing with your life that’s even half as cool?