The date says 2022 but the web design says 2002.
Your honor this is bullshit
Submitted 9 months ago by Crack0n7uesday@lemmy.world to [deleted]
https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/1f8d0703-1a63-4f0f-bd31-4c46c122319e.jpeg
Comments
DBT@lemmy.world 9 months ago
Crack0n7uesday@lemmy.world 9 months ago
It’s a government website so 2002 would be new under those standards.
0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 months ago
Just be thankful you don’t have to save a WordPerfect document to a 3.5" floppy and mail it to the court
explodicle@local106.com 9 months ago
I hope they never “upgrade” to web 2.0/3.0.
yamapikariya@lemmyfi.com 9 months ago
I recommend “Law Talk With Mike” on YouTube for a lot of quite similar court silliness.
imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee 9 months ago
The channel is fun but he occasionally leaks how much of a douchebag he is and I had to stop supporting someone like that
VerseAndVermin@lemmy.world 9 months ago
Ooo, thank you. I love this stuff. Law is fun when you just get to dip your toe into the good stuff.
ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 9 months ago
Above this, I recommend this state of Georgia vs Denver Fenton that is a word for word and sound for sound actual court stenographer transcript reading. Hilarious and insane that this went down in a real court setting. I believe the judge got a bit of a reprimand for it, but was allowed to continue being a judge.
yamapikariya@lemmyfi.com 9 months ago
That sounds great! Thanks for the suggestion.
paws@cyberpaws.lol 9 months ago
OldSquishyGardener is my goto
tormeh@discuss.tchncs.de 9 months ago
@rebmasel on TikTok is amazing. Her readings of “iconic court transcripts” are gold
DBT@lemmy.world 9 months ago
Why did you take a picture of the screen instead of screenshot?
And why is there a booger on your screen?
I need answers.
clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 9 months ago
Oh thank goodness, I thought the booger was on my screen.
Jerkface@lemmy.world 9 months ago
Twist: his booger just happened to be under yours.
Crack0n7uesday@lemmy.world 9 months ago
I’m not the OP for this pic, sorry, I don’t have the answers to that, it was originally on a you laugh you loose thread.
_number8_@lemmy.world 9 months ago
people would hate the courts less if they’d just talk like human being rather than cloak everything in this bullshit cold legalese which makes everyone sound as stark and removed as possible. if someone’s life is at stake, fucking talk like it!
modifier@lemmy.ca 9 months ago
My first instinct is to agree with you.
My second instinct is to think that most of what I tend to think of as bullshit cold legalese is actually exceedingly precise, which I have to admit is a good quality to have when it comes to matters of law.
Wirlocke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 months ago
On the flipside, if the language is too casual you’d end up with people winning cases by being popular and snarky.
Part of the reason why Trump’s cases have such a high turnover of lawyers. His antics just don’t amuse a judge used to professionalism.
Not saying you don’t have a point. After stuff like bees being classified as fish in California to protect them. It’s clear to see legalese has gone to far.
2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de 9 months ago
Lmao, you weren’t joking. edition.cnn.com/2022/06/06/us/…/index.html
As absurd as it is, this is probably just because it’s easier than changing that law.
NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social 9 months ago
Is that casenet?
Crack0n7uesday@lemmy.world 9 months ago
Yes
FIST_FILLET@lemmy.ml 9 months ago
your honor my client was simply standing on business
wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 9 months ago
I guess they they their motions…
(•_•)
get the best of them
( •_•)>⌐■-■
(⌐■_■)
NielsBohron@lemmy.world 9 months ago
YEEAAAHH!
VampyreOfNazareth@lemm.ee 9 months ago
Legendary!
Zevlen@lemmy.world 9 months ago
Noice ! 👌