Wirlocke
@Wirlocke@lemmy.blahaj.zone
- Comment on AI boom could falter without wider adoption, Microsoft chief Satya Nadella warns 6 days ago:
Fundamentally due to it’s design, LLMs are digital duct tape.
The entire history of computer science has been making compromises between efficient machine code and human readable language. LLM’s solve this in a beautifully janky way, like duct tape.
But it’s ultimately still a compromise, you’ll never get machine accuracy from an LLM because it’s sole purpose is to fulfill the “human readable” part of that deal. So it’s applications are revolutionary in the same way as “how did you put together this car engine with only duct tape?” kind of way.
- Comment on smart 2 weeks ago:
Multiple choice powerpoints but it’s competitive based on who submits the correct answer fastest typically played at school hosted by the teacher. Under a certain age basically all of us have done a Kahoot.
- Comment on Oh no my harvest is too bountiful 2 months ago:
STEM fields are just full of furries, I don’t make the rules.
- Comment on Black Holes 5 months ago:
Nothing you said about black holes really contradicts what they were saying? Even if a star and black hole can have the same gravity, there is still a shell of space that once you pass you cannot ever return. I’m sure Superman could go into a star and come back out, not so much with a black hole.
- Comment on Water Snek 5 months ago:
It likely was the most efficient energy-wise, why waste energy going against the current when it’ll undo itself anyways.
- Comment on Even better than a cart of apples 1 year ago:
Maybe you built up antibodies cause I didn’t notice at all.
- Comment on Elon Musk’s X is now worth less than a quarter of its $44 billion purchase price 1 year ago:
If he was that competent why would resort to openly pumping and dumping meme coins in public just prior to this stunt.
He has some dangerous strings he can pull, but that doesn’t make him a good puppet master.
- Comment on Elon Musk’s X is now worth less than a quarter of its $44 billion purchase price 1 year ago:
Correct me if I’m wrong but I’m pretty sure he gave am outlandish bid for Twitter to manipulate it’s stock prices when he pulled put, but he was sued into following through.
I don’t think he ever wanted to buy it, or at least he wanted to crash it’s value to come back and buy it on the cheap.