Your local government spent thousands of dollars on each one, so return the favor by protecting their investment!
If they are cold, a little EMP burst will keep them warm the test of their lives.
Sleeve to protect your Flock camera from the elements by covering the lens
Submitted 13 hours ago by Metostopholes@midwest.social to 3dprinting@lemmy.world
https://makerworld.com/en/models/3107766-flock-sock-flock-camera-cover
Comments
Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 hour ago 
cannedtuna@lemmy.world@lemmy.world 12 hours ago If you’re cold, they’re cold. Bring Flock cameras inside.
1984@lemmy.today 2 hours ago
Set them on fire, it creates heat.
nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 7 hours ago
…Walmart bathrooms, and smash them?
somegeek@programming.dev 12 hours ago
This is too peaceful. Use destructive methods
wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 hours ago
Do you really not understand that this is meant to be an easy tool to disable them, so that someone could do anything (or nothing) else to them safely?
somegeek@programming.dev 5 minutes ago
It’s silly.
You can just put a normal sock/cloth on them for that.
And the flock guys will just simply remove it and you have spent money on making that fancy cover. You can straight up smash it with the same shovel/stick that it shows in the video instead of dressing it up.
daannii@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
And it’s technically not damaging the camera. So hard to get prosecuted for vandalism.
FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 10 hours ago
Clean the lenses cover with acetone. You’re doing a public service keeping that lenses clean and crisp.
whats_a_lemmy@midwest.social 8 hours ago
Fill the sock with expanding foam
spitfire@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
We’ve got to do what we can to protect corporate property
quick_snail@feddit.nl 4 hours ago Article doesn’t load
daannii@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
I wonder if you could design these to basically 3d a frame and then attach cardboard , price of fabric, on the front. or something.
to reduce the filament use and print time.
This is kind of a big print. Good idea though.
Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 hours ago
Seems to me like this could be modified to mount a laser pointer to point directly into the lens without having to stand in front of the camera to aim it.
daannii@lemmy.world 2 hours ago
They do work better/faster at closer range.
CADmonkey@lemmy.world 7 hours ago
Perhaps. But instead of a peice of fabric, maybe use a high resolution picture of someone’s asshole?
daannii@lemmy.world 4 hours ago
I like the ideas you bring to the conversation
Cris_Citrus@piefed.zip 1 hour ago
From what I understand there are sensors other than cameras that you need to worry about that will still be active even with the lens covered