Greebles!

Comments

• Ranvier@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Bonus points (BPs) for when you get entire sentences full of abbreviations (SFOA). Even more BPs when you get SFOA with abbreviations containing abbreviations within them (SWACAWT).

  source

  • Hupf@feddit.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    SWACs for short

    source

    • xthexder@l.sw0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      SWACFS

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• frustratedphagocytosis@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  I call BS, there's not enough room for this sort of detail, you'd get 'as described previously in [1-4, 9, 84, 86, 150-160, unpublished observations]' half of which are unaccessible journals, out of print book chapters, and abstracts in German

  source

  • inconel@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    I only encountered once, but when it happened I had to realize how old science field may have been different. the exact detail I was looking for should be in [20] … but “[20] to be published” (presumably by the same author). I couldn’t find any papet by author’s name other than that but the author was so sure getting published.

    source

    • frustratedphagocytosis@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      My favorite is recursive bad citations in the method section. As in, citing a paper that cited a previous paper that itself cited a previous paper that cited an abstract with no detailed methodology whatsoever, leaving the true methods a mystery unless you get the senior author to reply to emails.

      source
  • sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Goddamn it, why is academia so indecipherable and yet so relatable??

    source
• cro_magnon_gilf@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Yes… different field… surely

  source

  • amda@feddit.nl ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    More like subfield… Or subsubfeild… Paper you didn’t write?

    source

    • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Implying you understand the papers you wrote.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• ZJBlank@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Ah yes, the two genders: erect and flaccid

  source

  • tdawg@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    I don’t care how erect you think you are! You were born flaccid and we raised you flaccid!

    source
• samus12345@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  First they take the dingle bop and they smooth it out with a bunch of shleem.

  source

  • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    But why did they cut the fleeb?

    source

    • samus12345@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      My best guess is that when they cut the fleeb, it makes more fleebs, which they can then use to make more plumbuses (plumbi?)

      source
• outer_spec@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  These gliberals with their new genders… back in my day greebles only had two genders, PLOK and GLIP!!!

  source
• Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Is this a real paper? Please tell me it is.

  source

  • fossilesque@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    I forgot to link. Thanks for the reminder. It’s actually in several papers as a known methodology!

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greeble_(psychology)?wprov=…

    source

    • redballooon@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Science is awesome

      source
    • Zoidsberg@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Why do they all have boners

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  what the fuck is kapwing and why do i see their watermark so often?

  source

  • fossilesque@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Your worst nightmare.

    Image

    source
  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    AI video and content creator? Not sure why it’s on a meme/still image. Not familiar with it.

    source
• Granixo@feddit.cl ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  I see Baby Yoda in a few of these.

  source

  • Magnetar@feddit.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    I thought all of them are Yodas, some with a boner.

    source
• oxideseven@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Freaking glips with their silly uphorns!

  Downhorn for life! Long live plok!

  source
• azdalen@beehaw.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  🤔 lacks common language / symbols that are used in contrary and confusing ways

  source
• iAvicenna@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Different field? More like a different child field of my root field

  source

  • lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Different child field? This is like my first two read-throughs of a new paper in my own specialization!

    source
• Pregnenolone@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  form

  source
• Mothra@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  These greebles made some very interesting vases with lids I see

  source