Zoom in a little more. I can’t see what it says.
They removed the like button. What next, they gonna remove videos? It’s just gonna be ads???
Submitted 1 day ago by jia_tan@lemmy.blahaj.zone to [deleted]
https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/pictrs/image/36028aba-a006-45f8-9b7a-7d245c52863e.webp
Comments
not_that_guy05@lemmy.world 1 day ago
lolola@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
not_that_guy05@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Ok thanks.
colourlessidea@sopuli.xyz 1 day ago
op using nuclear it’s erous and bad for the environment
No.
8g CO2/kWh
43g CO2/kWh
Naich@lemmings.world 1 day ago
There’s nothing more erous about nuclear then it being used by op.
Janx@piefed.social 10 hours ago
I can’t even read this shit. You really have to steal and then crop out where it came from this bad!?
Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de 12 hours ago
I love how people act like german government is against nuclear. When the actual situation is the following:
Reality:
- Yes, Nuclear is not popular with the German public and might not for good reasons
- The German nuclear power plants were planned to shutdown and weren’t maintained to continue to run for a long time.
- Continue to run the nuclear power plants would require a lot of investment
- Germany is and was moving towards renewable energies for independence of nuclear and Russian gas anyway.
- Building new nuclear power plants take years.
- Germany choose to invest in renewable energy instead.
- Germany doesn’t have mines for nuclear materials to run a nuclear power plant independently, unlike France.
- Germany has domestic coal. Germany has coal power plants. Germany can run coal power plants independently. That is important for the military.
- So germany chose a bit more coal short term; and coal and nuclear free future. Germany is literally uses less coal now than ever.
So germany has been reducing nuclear, coal and natural gas power usage.
bigmamoth@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
the cope is unreal.
nuclear is the cleanest and most sure energy method of production proportionaly to the enrgy produce by it and by a long mile. You were convinced by stupid ecology ideals ( russian propaganda) to not invest in anything except for unreliable and intermitent energy production cause you could always burn russian gaz. if it wasnt the case nord stream 1 and 2 wouldnt exist. You still produce and pollute a lot with coal, France it s litteraly 100x less coal.
1 you give no reason why nuclear bad 2 no vision of the future 3 no vision of the future + no money 4 yeah how independance from russia is going ? archive.is/p9noZ 5 no vision of future + no money 6 no vision of future 7 yeah talk me about all the uranium mine in france 8 yeah cause uranium isnt well known to have an ultra high energy dencity and you can’t procure it 9 yeah and it s dumb and it cost highly for lmittle to no benefice
wp germany
Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de 11 hours ago
I love how I never said nuclear was bad but gave the reasons of the German government.
Talk about cope.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uranium_mining_in_France
France has stopped. But they can easily pick it up again.
Fucking hell.
flamingos@feddit.uk 1 day ago
You can hit share, more, Firefox and then hold the image to download the original image, btw.
tomiant@piefed.social 10 hours ago
Can’t do shit on the app tho.
richardwallass@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
France’s Naarea, a nuclear startup, has filed for a suspension of payments as a protective measure while it seeks new financing, indicating financial difficulties in the sector. This situation reflects broader challenges faced by the nuclear industry in France, which is undergoing significant changes and investments.
4am@lemmy.zip 22 hours ago
AI-ass answer
richardwallass@sh.itjust.works 15 hours ago
Doesn’t make difference that this project is dead and a total waste of money
ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world 20 hours ago
IMO: Wind/Solar > Nuclear (no Rosatom) > Fossil > No power > Nuclear (Rosatom)
tkk13909@sopuli.xyz 1 day ago
I love Kyle Hill
UltraBlack@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I’m pretty sure kyle hill is getting paid by nuclear power companies. He’s constantly shilling
Derpenheim@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
Shilling? My brother in christ, it is quite literally the only way forward. Fossil fuels are killing us, and will continue to do so. Wind and solar just aren’t enough. Hydro and geo energies aren’t available everywhere.
There is no shilling, there is only desperate pleading for us to pull our heads out of our asses and do something.
VibeSurgeon@piefed.social 14 hours ago
Wind and solar just aren’t enough.
Wind + solar + storage is both enough and beating nuclear at this point, and by the time the next nuclear power plant actually manages to get online, the calculation will be even further in favour of that mix, on account of the absolutely plummeting cost of storage, which is following the same trend as solar used to, with costs reductions >98%. Not to mention the built-in resilience you get from having a more widely distributed instead of having a few nodes producing the lion’s share of your power.
I don’t have any ideological opposition to nuclear. If you manage to build it without massive subsidies and taking care of your waste, feel free to build them. That’s happening in exactly 0 places worldwide though.
black0ut@pawb.social 21 hours ago
Nuclear is not economically feasible and still does have its fair share of problems. It also generates waste, even if at far less scale than fossil fuels. Wind and solar are cheap and very scalable in most countries, which makes them economically feasible (and can also accelerate a move from fossil). Don’t be so quick to discard them.
As a matter of fact, last month, in Spain, we generated more energy just from wind than from nuclear. (31.7% vs 21.4%) source
Deme@sopuli.xyz 14 hours ago
There’s no world where you could build more nuclear at the rate that would be required to fix things. It’s expensive as hell and there’s not enough skilled people to go around to build all of it globally.
KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
I must be a shill to.
Gonzako@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I’d love nuclear in my country and making nukes is a great plus too
oneser@lemmy.zip 20 hours ago
And who’s gonna give us that sweet, sweet yellow cake? :)
TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 hours ago
At least removing the like button isn’t as bad as posting images with parts of the text cut off.