oneser

This is the hard part about batteries, which I think will lead to an eventual re-nationalisation of the grid. We all still need it to be able to deliver the same quality, but more and more people will be using it less of the time.

So cost of running doesn’t change, but charged revenue will decrease (maybe even exponentially) over the next year’s.

Not a personal attack at all, but do you see any realistic way to tackle this apart from raising base service fees?

This is cool and if you feel like posting more updates in the future, I personally would appreciate it.

It mirrors my own entry into self hosting these last years. Funnest one for me was spending 5 hours trying to log into my server after my IP “upgraded” for me, after they replaced it with a system with which the settings can only be modified via an app… 😊

But you live and learn and wait for the next headache!

Have you tried the instructions on page 30 of the user manual?

Some of my earbuds can re-pair with a hard reset, but I’ve never tried to do it with mixing 2 pairs of the same buds…

IMO I would not try and repair those, unless you are very comfortable with electronics, plastics and understand the batteries. They typically have 1-2 Li-Ion cells under the part that hangs behind your ear. Ruining the sealing on those could lead to sweat ingress and eventually short circuit during use.

The world is a good place. Thanks for helping that.

Sorry, I mean to say that the impact of mining is not limited to the energy transition in the way this article appears to focus on it. I do not disagree with any of your points.

In my opinion the headline should simply read

Major financiers neglect energy transition risks from mining.

This discussion has fundamentally very little to do with the energy transition and is more generally about destructive mining practices. The link to the energy transition in my opinion is intentionally damaging to the industry, or am I missing something here?