Slop videos have clogged the recommendations on youtube since well before the AI era. Top 10 clickbait videos with text to speech narration…
The Global Rise of Low-Quality AI Videos: new research shows that 21-33% of YouTube’s feed may consist of AI slop or brainrot videos
Submitted 1 month ago by King@sh.itjust.works to technology@lemmy.world
https://www.kapwing.com/blog/ai-slop-report-the-global-rise-of-low-quality-ai-videos/
Comments
Blaster_M@lemmy.world 1 month ago
plz1@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I tried watching what was supposed to be a video comparing several linux distros. Instead, it was AI text to speech narrating over random images. Are people uploading this crap in an attempt to get a share of ad revenue, or just to be awful? I have to hope Youtube doesn’t let this be fully automated, so people are doing this on purpose…
Nalivai@lemmy.world 1 month ago
It was already fully automated years ago, with the bullshit oriented at small kids. It was multibillion endeavour even then, YouTube did nothing to it, why would they, it’s their dream business model. The one now, when bots generate slop that is watched by other bots, is just a continuation of that
GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 1 month ago
YouTube did nothing to it, why would they, it’s their dream business model.
They could still cut the crap without change in revenue. People would just click on other videos instead of AI Slop.
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 month ago
theres alot of that with mcu/dcaeu type videos, its so obvious when they mis-pronounce names too.
SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Don’t see the slop because I only use subscriptions feed.
Lonewolfmcquade@lemmy.world 1 month ago
To expand on this, I have witnessed small, indie channels have their content copied, processed through AI so it is stripped of audio, watermarks and re-edited. Then it is posted as a new video. When it is reported as a fake, or pirated copy, or not original content, Google then puts the burden of proof on the small indie channel that originally created the content, often requiring them to lawyer up and file a legal complaint, before they will take any action to remove the AI slop. It is fucking absurd. It would only take a real person about 60 seconds to compare the content and dates to determine who is the theif.
ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 1 month ago
The other 70% are non-AI brainrot videos. 1% has any value.
oplkill@lemmy.world 1 month ago
This. AI just boosted it, it was always like that
FreeBooteR69@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
You see a lot of ai videos of prominent personalities, seriously doubt they have permission to use their identity.
FaceDeer@fedia.io 1 month ago
And yet I don't see any of that. Lots of people complain about "the algorithm" but it seems to be working well for me.
Engywuck@lemmy.zip 1 month ago
My algorithm is as simple as avoiding YouTube altogether and finding what I need elsewhere (preferably in text form).
floofloof@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
The worst thing I’ve found with the algorithm is that it continually tries to steer me towards right-wing crap like Jordan Petersen, even though it must know my sympathies are with the opposite end of the political spectrum. And if ever you come to YouTube with no account on a clean machine, it pushes almost entirely right-wing propaganda videos.
BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Holy shit, yes. You can watch leftist content for years, but heaven forbid you watch one gaming-related video and it assumes you’re an alt-right racist gamergate incel.
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 month ago
its either that or, thirst trap videos. i dont log in, so i just close the browser and reopen youtube and its gone.
Lfrith@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
I noticed that they show up in the next section of video game related videos before I blockeded those type of channels. It is interesting that video game clips tend to result in those type of podcasters showing up in those feeds, which is likely due to the strategy used by those groups using games to try to reach that demographic.
placebo@lemmy.zip 1 month ago
Same. I had an issue with AI videos at some points, but some dislikes later I don’t see them anymore.
Lfrith@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
You need an account for an algorithm, which I dont use with youtube. My algorithm has been blocking channels.
And when it comes to search results youtube isn’t great usually defaulting to showing the highest subscriber videos over what might be more relevant and pushing down smaller channels.
Fizz@lemmy.nz 1 month ago
At Christmas the topic of what videos we watch came up and I was shocked to hear over half the people there mention watching AI videos. Its insane, these are decent intelligent people watching shit like that stupid weightlifting cat and bigfoot vlogging. It seemed mostly because they couldn’t get rid of YouTube shorts but still. The family members who used Instagram had it way worse they only consumed reels slop and didnt watch any long form video. It was really are “we are so cooked moment”.
Etterra@discuss.online 1 month ago
When new channels show up on my recommendations I like to check out how old the channels are, especially if the quality is low or the voice is a clear or probably robot. AI channels don’t tend to be very old, and they tend to have insanely high upload speeds. Cranking out hour-long, edited, topical (not gameplay for example) videos every single day is hard as hell and nobody can do it without building up to it with editors and maybe script writers.
For example, Simon Whistler is the most prolific video creator I can think of and he’s got a crew to do it full time, but he’s been at it for ages and he’s there in all the videos.
I hate it that channels that never before had face cams are increasingly having to use them or otherwise change things because it’s the easiest way (for now) to prove they’re actual humans. But that’s the hell we’ve been dragged into.
Spacehooks@reddthat.com 1 month ago
Would be nice if youtube made it easier to block channels.
Darkenfolk@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Meaning that the only thing that changed is that it is “AI” and that they can cram out more bullshit in less time.
morto@piefed.social 1 month ago
We spend more energy to create more videos and use more storage
sramder@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Are brainrot videos the ones where someone on an impossibly clean set hides the 5 seconds of info you were promised somewhere in a 20 minute video the purports to explain the process you need and it end up no longer matching the software’s UI?
Asking for a friend ;-)
Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Just watched a “Feinman” video on Youtube I thought was a little off. Especially when one of the examples simply seemed outright wrong.
But I thought it was probably me who misunderstood something. Until I read the description, and it turned out his voice was recreated by AI, and the “lecture” was designed to be in the “spirit” of Feinman!
It had Feinmans name all over it, and then in the description they end it with:
That shit should be outright illegal, it is fraud, Feinman had nothing to do with the content, and it even had mistakes!
frongt@lemmy.zip 1 month ago
Just stop watching Youtube entirely except for channels you specifically want. The entire thing is a slop platform.
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 month ago
google/youtube likes to produce slop, since thier whole business now is including AI into everything.
morto@piefed.social 1 month ago
And make sure to block ads when viewing it
VOG@chatgptjailbreak.tech 1 month ago
This happened to me with Alan Watts, but I’ve heard so much of his content that I knew it was fake within a couple of minutes. It’s such a problem that legitimate fans of his are now mostly posting with titles that include ‘real’ ‘authentic’ or ‘no ai’ in order to stand out from the mountains of BS.
AstralPath@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
I wish Youtube operated like a PiHole where you could upload a list of channels and block them all in one fell swoop.
cevn@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I just saw one of these too. RIP YouTube.